You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to sipxco...@googlegroups.com
Some ITSPs do not appear to support pre-loaded route headers in SIP packets. Is there an option in Sipxcom to avoid generating these records (see image) for register and invite messages?
Many thanks in advance.
Peter
George Niculae
unread,
Apr 8, 2015, 4:12:14 PM4/8/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Some ITSPs do not appear to support pre-loaded route headers in SIP packets. Is there an option in Sipxcom to avoid generating these records (see image) for register and invite messages?
then restart sipxbridge and try again (mind that sipxbridge.xml is overwritten by cfengine)
George
pmkr...@gmail.com
unread,
Apr 9, 2015, 12:13:05 PM4/9/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to sipxco...@googlegroups.com, pmkr...@gmail.com
Hi George, many thanks for the responses. I did try setting the loose-route-invite parameter to false, and the pre-loaded route record is still generated by Sipxbridge. The direction given was either to use another ITSP or stand-alone SBC if sipX is used.