Deprecate sioc:name and encourage the use of foaf:name instead

[Stephane Corlosquet]

Hi,

I talked to John about this a couple of times and never ended up sending an email about it. sioc:name is redundant with foaf:name and does not really provide its own semantics compared to foaf:name. Why do we need it?

Steph.

[Alexandre Passant]

Indeed, not sure if much needed, and both are datatype properties with
an open domain.

However, I'd then simply use rdfs:label rather than foaf:name

Alex.

>
> Steph.
>
> >

--
Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .