Hello MRST Team! I am trying to plot test results of geothermal modelling, for resolution testing. The models are in sizes with 100 m, 300 m and 900 m increments. The full model is roughly 4500x2700m. Every model is run at the same schedule setting: same total simulation time, timestep duration, and ramp up. At the end, I get a graph figure as one of the outputs. I was wondering if there is a way to overlay these graph figures for each of these models on one graph (most likely a figure showing the change in temperature over time/timesteps)? Also given given the model size, how do we know we have an appropriate spatial resolution?
This is how one of the graphs look like:

I have also run into these types of warnings while running the models, I can send the script over together with the grid if it would be useful to see what is going on here and whether it would be an issue for the results:


Thank you!
Hi Knut-Andreas,
Thank you for the detailed reply. The figures appeared as intended. I was wondering, is there a way to rename the datasets as well? I tried typing 'datasetnames', ['dataset1'; 'dataset2'; 'dataset3'] after using report.ReservoirTime, but the result does not show the name of the datasets in the figures themselves (see below).

The geothermal model we are using assumes water, which is mostly incompressible, while having another component, i.e. salt dissolved within water. Perhaps that is also why this warning appeared? So far, we have been using this standard simulator function (based on the examples given in the Simulation of Geothermal Systems Using MRST), is it sufficient enough or is there a better solver for this kind of problem available?
[wellSols, states, report] = simulateScheduleAD(state0, model, schedule, 'afterStepFn', fn)
Thank you!