Whatyou are seeing is a data entry problem. In the GraphQL API when you add data on the predicate with an hasInverse directive on either side, the mutation rewriter in Dgraph writes this data inversely to both predicates, but when you mutate data outside of the GraphQL API endpoint such as you did with the mutate endpoint using DQL, then you bypass this control. You could have fixed this by either correcting the inverse relationships or by correctly handing inverse edges manually when using DQL.
@amaster507 & @MichelDiz first of all thanks for the help.
If i understood correctly, i use in my Schema a GraphQL API specific feature (hasinverse) and save my Data with DQL, that will bypass the API and does not use the hasinverse feature.
If you are going to use DQL to mutate and query data, and you also want to be able to use the GraphQL API endpoint, then you will need to worry about how to correctly mutate data in DQL to mimic the API hasInverse logic, and you can also benefit by applying @reverse indexes.
Second:
As far i know GraphQL API has no concept like Facets. My Approach here is to create a 3rd type called Share and Connect Person and Company with the new Share node in the middle. But here i would use the @hasinverse feature from GraphQL Api and stay on the GraphQL path.
My problem is to choose which a approach is more modular and has more flexibility for future changes.
I hope is not Off topic, if it is i can make a new Thread.
Thanks for the patience for the beginner Questions.
I am trying to make edges such that parts of my mesh are smooth and rounded while others are sharper. Is there a way to perform an operation that does the opposite of an edge collapse? I guess the problem would be selecting which lines go to which vertex.
To find the maximum flow in a graph, why doesn't it suffice to only saturate all augmenting paths with the minimum edge capacity in that path without considering the back edges? I mean, what is the point calling it a back edge if we assume flow from it?
Reverse edges are automatically generated edges and are not part of your dataset. This means that you cannot run mutations directly on the reverse edges. Mutating the forward edge will automatically update the reverse edge.
The easiest way to correct and apply reverse edges is using JSON. It is simply having the directive on schema at the desired edge. When building your mutations remember that there is no reverse syntax in JSON. So what you should do is similar to RDF: change the arrangement of the JSON objects.
If you have made a course and you want to ride it in reverse order, is this possible on the 1040? If so, how do you reverse your route/course? On my Wahoo it was a very simple option to choose from, but so far nor on my 1040 device, nor on the garmin connect app, I can find this option. Does it exist or not?
I would like to use a robust solution (i.e. one that understands the graph and therefore probably doesn't use sed) that preserves any existing edge labels and other attributes. Note that I am not merely talking about getting dot to render my graph with the arrows pointing backward; I really need a graph whose edges are reversed. (In this case, I intend to reverse the edges, apply prune, then reverse the edges again.)
Easiest way is to include a graph-level dir statement where you reverse the direction of the arrows. By default, the direction is forward. If you reverse it at the top of your graph, then without changing a single other line, the graph will show up the way you want.
I created a round-over using the chamfer tool. Left the app and now need to reverse that round-over. Reselecting the edge and trying to reverse does not bring the edge back to flat. Is there a way to do this that I am missing?
I also have a chamfer I can not change once done. If I click the now rounded face it jumps to Offset and if I click Chamfer it highlights ther perimeter.
Is this a bug? Happens at another place of the model also.
Thank you Laci, that lets me go on with the model but looks like a workaround to me, to something that should be a simple delete? Just wondering how this happened and why this face behaves differently.
This is where I got stuck and why I have a feeling I may need an edge function instead of going with the traditional redirect route. I would like the subdomain to do a 301 redirect to the subdirectory, which Webflow supports. But, I learned the hard way that causes a redirect loop and thus a Too Many Redirects error. I had a feeling that would happen but hoped it would somehow be fine haha.
I guess my question is, how exactly would I go about approaching this? I have used an edge function before to rewrite and replace standalone elements on a page, but this feels like I need to rewrite an entire page.
With this configuration, a user is able to have their main website / root domain (i.e.
example.com) hosted by Netlify while also adding any other sites under it via a reverse proxy. For example, a blog they may have hosted on Ghost, Webflow, WordPress, etc.
There are two benefits to this configuration. The first being - SEO; by 301 redirecting your subdomain (
blog.example.com) to your subdirectory (
example.com/blog), search engines will only crawl and rank the latter one. The second benefit is users will be able to use Netlify Edge Functions and not have to worry about users bypassing them by accessing their blog through the subdomain instead.
If I reverse a single edge in a DAG, how can I efficiently propagate the effects of that (e.g. change other edges) such that I don't introduce any cycles by said reversal? Is there a named algorithm for this that I should look up? I see some other questions about reversing an entire DAG; I'm only concerned with a single edge plus its necessary influence, which I hope is not the entire graph in a typical case.
To add more context: I'm working with some disjunctive job-shop representations. Example: -tools/documentation/user_manual/manual/ls/jobshop_def_data.html . I want to minimize the number of updated edges. And after the update, I still need all of the nodes in the graph to be accessible through some path.
The Disciple BLACK is an original design by Shivworks. This compact fixed blade is designed to offer exceptional performance in a small package. The Disciple features a reverse-edge blade, a style pioneered by Craig Douglas. The reverse edge is perfect for quick and efficient everyday use or high-stress situations. The blade is coated with a durable black PVD coating, the same sleek black material as the popular Clinch Pick 2.0 Black. The tough finish ensures exceptional durability and helps protect against corrosion. The handle of the Disciple is crafted from textured G10 material, providing a secure and comfortable grip even in wet or slippery conditions. The included sheet provides reliable retention to keep the knife in place.
Recommended ADD-ON: We recommend purchasing a DCC (Discreet Carry Concepts) MOD 4 clip, which attaches directly to your pants without a belt, for behind-the-belt application, gym shorts, scrubs, or bag. For more information on DCC clips, view our accessories page.
SHIVWORKS PRODUCTS GROUP LLC, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER ARISING FROM THE SALE, HANDLING OR USE OF ANY PRODUCTS.
Just wondering if any one has tried a Karambit in the WE yet, if so any tips or tricks to share? The reverse blade I dont think will be to much trouble as there is plenty of room to work with the WE stones. I know that WE sells the rounded stones, but I dont have those, though if I start having more karambits show up I might invest in some. Any way, tips, tricks, advice, looking for any and all. Thanks folks.
There are a few things to watch out for. Mostly as Josh had mentioned at some point, scrubbing up n down vertically is a bad thing and will almost instantly leave score lines that are hard to get out.
Heel to tip sharpening is not a problem to sweep the blade with full contact of the paddle, but if going tip to heel watch out for a score line being formed on the trailing side of the paddle when you stop. Lifting the trailing edge of paddle up off the blade will solve that for ya too.
This was only mentioned for sharpening toward the heel because I experienced a groove being formed when the paddle stops abruptly at the ricasso. If you sharpen moving the paddles towards the tip, disregard this entire conversation. ?
KnifeKnerd, and CliffCurry; Thank you! Great advice, and explanations. I use mostly edge trailing. When I was younger I thought I knew about sharpening knives. Then I spent some time in Japan. I learned that I didnt even know how much I didnt know about it. ? To this day, Im still learning. So finding folks that are willing to share advice and the knowledge they have is an amazing thing, at least to me. Especially being such a newbie to the Wicked Edge. I believe this Karambit was a custom made, though I might be mistaken. Here is my progress so far.
Still have some work to be done on it,though I dont think I will take it to much past this point. For me I found holding the paddles at the top and using my ring and pinky finger to pull the bottom of the paddle away from the blade. through reading this typed out seems not to explain it well, I hope it will do for explanation. There was some marring on the ricasso from the owner (I guess) of sharpening this before, so I tryed to smooth that out a little using some fine sand paper.
3a8082e126