FHM January 2009

11 views
Skip to first unread message

zanmato79

unread,
Dec 6, 2008, 6:30:46 AM12/6/08
to Simply-Gorgeous
New year, new calendar with this issue. Sadly the calendar is nothing
to write home about as predicted. It features one shot each of most of
the girls featured in 2008 but most of these photoshoots didn't offer
much in the first place when they appeared in the magazine.

On to the issue itself, the main cover star is Katy Perry. Ok, she's
what you call a A-list celebrity I suppose but again it appears most
of the entire budget has been blown this month again on the main
feature. The shoot itself is taken in a old Victorian building
overlooking Buckingham Palace so the article says anyway, we don't
actually see the Palace through the windows. If you're into Perry's
legs then this is a shoot for you, the shoot is very Arena-isque in
style. Nothing revealing is worn and the poses are not at all
adventurous.

The other shoots feature Beatrice Rosen, an actress who recently
starred in Sharpe's Peril. Again, nothing to get overly bothered
about. One shot in this shoot is a full-page but out of focus which
makes it pointless in my opinion and it seems intentional.

Lastly, the other shoot has a couple of shots of a girl who was in
Hollyoaks. Again, it's just the run-of-the-mill underwear shots, bland
and boring.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages