SimpleRecord

Just wanted to know if there is a DISTINCT keyword in sql query in the simplerecord?

On Friday, 10 August 2012 03:06:10 UTC+5:30, Kris Read wrote: Wondering if this project is active

Hey guys, I'm wondering if anyone has had any luck integrating SimpleRecord with Devise, the user

haha. It happens. Better change those keys though! On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Zachary

should be fixed with aws 2.5.3.

I solved this problem, (:facepalm) this @product = Product.new(params[:product]) params[:product][:

You'll want to store images on S3. Use the https://github.com/appoxy/aws gem. On Fri, Apr 29,

Thats great. Looking at the commits, the faraday appeared pretty conversion with only a couple

SimpleDB has eventual consistency, you should read about that a bit. You can pass :consistent_read=

I am seeing something strange and not sure what is going on. I have some pretty generic rails 3

Ahhh, got it. I'll have a look next week (out this week). Can you make an issue on github? On Tue

Hey all, Sorry for slow responses to questions and slow pull request responses, I've been working

And it turns out I was being dumb and calling Date.new() instead of Date.today() - sorry. :) The

Hi all, I was playing with the simple_record (v2.0.5) gem today and created a simple User object (

That's the funny part - no errors whatsoever - just no result. I think I've found it though..

if you're using it as a plugin, a reminder to put it at the very end of environment.rb or else

Been thinking of adding some special support for composite keys so you can define them on your model

And btw, if you want to do some asynchronous stuff, check out www.simpleworker.com . Makes it almost

Awesome! Works like a charm. Infinite thanks for such a fast response. On Dec 7, 4:29 pm, Travis

1. Multi-value attributes support Just set an array of values for an attribute and that's it. eg:

Thanks Travis. I put this in the production.rb and it appears to be working: require '

SimpleDB only stores strings so ints are stored with padding and offsets to they are comparable and

It's possible that it's not fully supported or it's a bug. Any chance you could debug it

SimpleRecord stores booleans as "true"/"false". Looks like it's not adding

dangit, I meant for aws gem. On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Travis Reeder <tre...@gmail.com>

So there's no mock version for test of simple_record then? -Mike On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:53 AM,

Using ActiveModel will enable a lot of stuff in SimpleRecord that we won't have to build

My guess is Paperclip is adding that method to the ActiveRecord::Base class so you could try to do

If you query a domain with a large number of objects, then you call results.size, SimpleRecord will

Oh, heh, don't even know what I've got in there. ;) Strange that the query is adding a WHERE