Re: SBT Invalid Sha1 Issue for Salat

[Erem Boto]

Can somebody in the know comment on this issue please? It seems to affect multiple relevant libraries.

On Thursday, October 18, 2012 12:36:24 PM UTC-7, Erem Boto wrote:

Hi Puneet,

I just ran into this problem recently too for another package. Here's the related issue where I mention this e-mail thread. This was a few days ago and I haven't seen any response yet...

On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:47:48 AM UTC-7, Puneet Jain wrote:

Hi,

I am using play for my application which using sbt in background. I am using com.novus.salat dependency, it was working fine since yesterday, but from today It's stop working. It's showing invalid sha error.

The various version are as follow:

sbt: 0.11.3

play: 2.0.2

Please help me to resolve this problem. It's a blocker for me, coz I am not able to build my project anymore. Thanks in advance.

Exception Log:

[info] downloading http://repo.typesafe.com/typesafe/snapshots/com/novus/salat-util_2.9.1/1.9.2-SNAPSHOT/salat-util_2.9.1-1.9.2-SNAPSHOT.jar ...

[warn] [FAILED     ] com.novus#salat-util_2.9.1;1.9.2-SNAPSHOT!salat-util_2.9.1.jar: invalid sha1: expected=793c10e22a514c772b3bf056e877244eab0fe000 computed=aeb84c8bdc82d38b7f3ac24c08791342c55059ac (594ms)

[warn] [FAILED     ] com.novus#salat-util_2.9.1;1.9.2-SNAPSHOT!salat-util_2.9.1.jar: invalid sha1: expected=793c10e22a514c772b3bf056e877244eab0fe000 computed=aeb84c8bdc82d38b7f3ac24c08791342c55059ac (594ms)

[warn] ==== Typesafe Snapshots Repository: tried

[warn]   http://repo.typesafe.com/typesafe/snapshots/com/novus/salat-util_2.9.1/1.9.2-SNAPSHOT/salat-util_2.9.1-1.9.2-SNAPSHOT.jar

[info] downloading http://repo.typesafe.com/typesafe/snapshots/com/novus/salat-core_2.9.1/1.9.2-SNAPSHOT/salat-core_2.9.1-1.9.2-SNAPSHOT.jar ...

[warn] [FAILED     ] com.novus#salat-core_2.9.1;1.9.2-SNAPSHOT!salat-core_2.9.1.jar: invalid sha1: expected=4d1e1a430e96067d6ce81d71f4109b9aa31048a7 computed=065c05137d48ea1059d0ec9f68f59bfd22691941 (660ms)

[warn] [FAILED     ] com.novus#salat-core_2.9.1;1.9.2-SNAPSHOT!salat-core_2.9.1.jar: invalid sha1: expected=4d1e1a430e96067d6ce81d71f4109b9aa31048a7 computed=065c05137d48ea1059d0ec9f68f59bfd22691941 (660ms)

[warn] ==== Typesafe Snapshots Repository: tried

[warn]   http://repo.typesafe.com/typesafe/snapshots/com/novus/salat-core_2.9.1/1.9.2-SNAPSHOT/salat-core_2.9.1-1.9.2-SNAPSHOT.jar

[warn] ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

[warn] ::              FAILED DOWNLOADS            ::

[warn] :: ^ see resolution messages for details  ^ ::

[warn] ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

[warn] :: com.novus#salat-util_2.9.1;1.9.2-SNAPSHOT!salat-util_2.9.1.jar

[warn] :: com.novus#salat-core_2.9.1;1.9.2-SNAPSHOT!salat-core_2.9.1.jar

[warn] ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Thanks,

Puneet

[Erem Boto]

I don't want to beat a dead horse here, but does anybody know what's going on with the incorrectly calculated SHA sums? Should I have posted the issue in a different bug tracker?

[eugene yokota]

I noticed that in both salat's case and in scala-guice's case the build is pulling from a SNAPSHOT dependency.

I also noticed that salat-util_2.9.1-1.9.2-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1 is returning 404:

http://repo.typesafe.com/typesafe/snapshots/com/novus/salat-util_2.9.1/1.9.2-SNAPSHOT/salat-util_2.9.1-1.9.2-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1

-eugene

[rktoomey]

Hi,

To make it clear, a vanilla sbt project loads salat 1.9.2-SNAPSHOT without complaint.  It's only the Play project that has an issue.

Am I doing something wrong publishing?  I switched from Linux to Mac recently but I used brew to install gpg and then set up the xsbt-gpg-plugin.

I'm also a bit confused about Salat snapshots on the Typesafe repo.  I publish directly to Sonatype snaps, and the version on the Typesafe repo frequently seems very outdated compared to the Sonatype repo.

It's very kind of Typesafe to host Salat on their repo!  But I would prefer that the hosted snaps either be up to date with Sonatype or not to be on Typesafe at all.

Thanks,

Rose

On Thursday, November 1, 2012 5:47:44 PM UTC-4, Erem Boto wrote: