First release
24 views
Skip to first unread message
Mark Harrah
Dec 17, 2008, 8:33:23 PM12/17/08
to simple-build-tool
After fixing some bugs discovered today (thanks Harshad!), I've posted
the first official release of sbt, version 0.3.1.
The short-term plan is to continue testing, documenting, and fixing
bugs as I or others find them. Longer-term, I'm open to suggestions
on tweaks, improvements, and new features. Thanks to everyone for
testing the early snapshots!
-Mark
the first official release of sbt, version 0.3.1.
The short-term plan is to continue testing, documenting, and fixing
bugs as I or others find them. Longer-term, I'm open to suggestions
on tweaks, improvements, and new features. Thanks to everyone for
testing the early snapshots!
-Mark
Harshad RJ
Dec 17, 2008, 10:52:30 PM12/17/08
to simple-b...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Mark Harrah <dmha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After fixing some bugs discovered today (thanks Harshad!), I've posted
> the first official release of sbt, version 0.3.1.
>
>
> After fixing some bugs discovered today (thanks Harshad!), I've posted
> the first official release of sbt, version 0.3.1.
>
Confirming that 0.3.1 works fine for me.
Your responsiveness is astonishing!
:)
Cheers,
--
Harshad RJ
http://hrj.wikidot.com
Mark Harrah
Dec 18, 2008, 7:45:12 AM12/18/08
to simple-b...@googlegroups.com
On 12/17/08, Harshad RJ <harsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Mark Harrah <dmha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> After fixing some bugs discovered today (thanks Harshad!), I've posted
>> the first official release of sbt, version 0.3.1.
>>
>
> Confirming that 0.3.1 works fine for me.
Great!
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Mark Harrah <dmha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> After fixing some bugs discovered today (thanks Harshad!), I've posted
>> the first official release of sbt, version 0.3.1.
>>
>
> Confirming that 0.3.1 works fine for me.
> Your responsiveness is astonishing!
> :)
across bugs in a build tool, so I'll try to address these things
quickly. Anyway, you helped yourself by responding to my questions
quickly.
-Mark
Mark Harrah
Dec 18, 2008, 8:11:55 AM12/18/08
to simple-build-tool
I noticed that I accidentally compiled the released jar using Java
1.6, which produces an error when run with 1.5. Because google code
won't let me replace sbt-0.3.1.jar, I had to bump the version to
0.3.2. If you are using 1.5, please use this version. If you will
only use Java 1.6 or later, you do not need the new jar. I have added
a note to check for 1.5 to my release checklist, but please complain
loudly if I do it again. Sorry about this.
Thanks,
Mark
1.6, which produces an error when run with 1.5. Because google code
won't let me replace sbt-0.3.1.jar, I had to bump the version to
0.3.2. If you are using 1.5, please use this version. If you will
only use Java 1.6 or later, you do not need the new jar. I have added
a note to check for 1.5 to my release checklist, but please complain
loudly if I do it again. Sorry about this.
Thanks,
Mark
Christos KK Loverdos
Dec 18, 2008, 8:33:38 AM12/18/08
to simple-b...@googlegroups.com
No problem, but:
What do you say? It will at least save you from one more item in your release check-list.
Mark Harrah
Dec 18, 2008, 9:52:58 AM12/18/08
to simple-b...@googlegroups.com
Yes, I agree. I have several steps that I have to do for a release
and I'd like to automate them all. Things like checking the version
of Java, uploading the jar to google code, tagging, and uploading the
API docs.
-Mark
and I'd like to automate them all. Things like checking the version
of Java, uploading the jar to google code, tagging, and uploading the
API docs.
-Mark
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages