Brett Welch br...@goodbarry.com • www.goodbarry.com • Online Businesses, Not Websites™![]()
Australia
P: +61 2 9011-1099 • D: +61 2 9011-1091
F: +61 2 9011-1098
99 Mount Street, Level 8 North Sydney NSW 2060USA
P: +1 415 345-7771
F: +1 415 345-7701
555 Post Street, Level 2 San Francisco CA 94102
I don't want to be mean, but I must say, as a professional programmer,
I find calling us "ninja's" to be slightly condescending. It may get
you a certain type of programmer, and maybe that's what you're after
(younger, less experienced) but yeah. I read your ad, and am
immediately put off. Just FYI. Take it as you will. I'm not a
potential candidate anyway.
Clearly there is nothing wrong with being a Ninja in general, it's
quite cool, but it just has a condescending air to it, when it's my
career. I'm a software engineer. It's in the same vein as Guru/etc.
Seemingly a term of endearment, but it does come across as very
disrespectful.
> I have always found that networks are a great way to get great people.
> Seek.com.au leaves me with *some* good candidates, but the wheat:chaff ratio
> is depressing... hopefully as a community we can rake together the sort of
> talent that startups truly need.
> Thanks guys,
--
noon silky
http://www.boxofgoodfeelings.com/
I don't mean to pick on you either; I know a lot of 'startups' take
this approach; so I hope you don't take my comments personally, more
of a global comment to these new companies hiring programmers. Just
note that it may affect the type of people you get, in terms of their
experience. And attitude as well (I'd argue, less structured). But
that's possibly what you want. I'd reconsider that, personally :) Just
my opinion, of course. For what it's worth.
Are you a programmer though? How long have you been one for? And what
languages? And pirates > ninja's.
> 2Vouch looks great - we are excited to use it for our next hire. Althought
> just recently we have found serveral great ppl though WOM on Twitter. Maybe
> there is some way to use 2Vouch and my Twitter network together? (also
> SocialMediaJobs.com.au has been useful but is very advery agency style)
>
> Keep up the good work Brett - Love GoodBarry
--
noon silky
http://www.boxofgoodfeelings.com/
In contrast to your view silky, i find the expression Ninja extremely enticing and extremely complimentary for programmers. I'd hate to see a job advert asking for pirate programmers.
2Vouch looks great - we are excited to use it for our next hire. Althought just recently we have found serveral great ppl though WOM on Twitter. Maybe there is some way to use 2Vouch and my Twitter network together? (also SocialMediaJobs.com.au <http://SocialMediaJobs.com.au> has been useful but is very advery agency style)
Keep up the good work Brett - Love GoodBarry
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:02 AM, silky <michae...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Brett | GoodBarry <br...@goodbarry.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I thought it would be useful to start a thread to share open vacancies that
> any of us may have (i.e we're hiring) or have heard of.
> I know Mike is perpetually hiring at Atlassian and we're in the same boat at
> GoodBarry, so to kick it off here's 5 positions: http://goodbarry.com/jobs
I don't want to be mean, but I must say, as a professional programmer,
I find calling us "ninja's" to be slightly condescending. It may get
you a certain type of programmer, and maybe that's what you're after
(younger, less experienced) but yeah. I read your ad, and am
immediately put off. Just FYI. Take it as you will. I'm not a
potential candidate anyway.
Clearly there is nothing wrong with being a Ninja in general, it's
quite cool, but it just has a condescending air to it, when it's my
career. I'm a software engineer. It's in the same vein as Guru/etc.
Seemingly a term of endearment, but it does come across as very
disrespectful.
> I have always found that networks are a great way to get great people.
> Seek.com.au <http://Seek.com.au> leaves me with *some* good candidates, but the wheat:chaff ratio
oh man, lets not even get started about talking about how incapable
many recruitment agents are in understanding the varying differences
between languages.
skribe
Frankly, and recruiting companies need to have this explicitly said to
them otherwise they don't get it, enthusiasm and fit counts for WAY
more than years doing something. It took me a long time to convince
people of this when I worked in government.
Keenness to learn. Team skills. Negotiation. All more important than
"I've done 8 years of Java coding." That 8 years may have been on
basic apps. Or in maintenance. No stretch.
We also have responsibilities as employers to provide meaningful work
and fulfilling jobs.
Have a look at this post on 21st C recruiting I recently did -
http://www.acidlabs.org/2009/01/07/the-right-stuff-attraction-engagement-retention-in-a-hyperconnected-world/
Steve
--
Stephen Collins
Cell +61 410 680722
Skype trib22
www.twitter.com/trib
www.linkedin.com/in/stephencollins
acidlabs
Conversation. Collaboration. Community.
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
Typically it isn't though. Generally if you spend 8 years doing
something you advance. All this is observed in the resume; which, you
know, you should read. Look at how they've advanced and what sort of
things they've worked on.
Enthusiasm and Fit are good, but if the guy just can't program, then
he's no good as a programmer. Maybe he can do something else, but not
programming. Unsurprisingly, an ability to program is a key part of
being a programmer :D
> We also have responsibilities as employers to provide meaningful work
> and fulfilling jobs.
>
> Have a look at this post on 21st C recruiting I recently did -
Frankly I'm not going to read a blog-post to continue a discussion on
a mailing list. Re-make your points here or don't make them at all.
Let's not just send links to each other, because basically it's a just
a form of self-advertisement; which I'm sure is critical to your
career, but not to mine. And I'm not interested in it.
> Steve
> --
> Stephen Collins
> Cell +61 410 680722
> Skype trib22
> www.twitter.com/trib
> www.linkedin.com/in/stephencollins
>
> www.acidlabs.org
>
> acidlabs
> Conversation. Collaboration. Community.
>
> This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
--
noon silky
http://www.boxofgoodfeelings.com/
I get your points, but I think the crankiness isn't a prerequisite. It
just makes you look snarky and intolerant.
I linked to my post as an indicator as to where some of the thinking
(including mine) is going. Up to you whether you read it. I don't much
mind.
And yes, you're right. Skills are necessary. But as someone who has in
the past run big (20+) dev (back and front end) teams in more than one
organisation, my point is that in my experience working in this
industry since 1995 you'll get better value from someone who has
skills *and* enthusiasm - demonstrated by involvement beyond just
sitting at their desk - than from someone who just sits there and may
not extend themselves. Time, while a factor, is rarely the determining
factor.
Steve
Sure? I'm still entitled to my opinion.
> Stephen Collins is a well known and well respected community member with
> deep and broad commercial experience - who you have now openly disregarded
> in public.
Yep. You're correct.
> Stephen blog, twitter profile and his online influence would be
> in the top 10 or 100 (depending which measure you take) of Australian media,
> technology and marketing people. IMO that gives him solid reason to use his
> blog posts as a reference point.
*shrug*, maybe you value his opinion more then me. That's fine. I just
think all comments should be made in one place (the email) rather than
pushing people to other - self advertising - areas. I won't.
Regardless, it's hardly that big of a deal. It's just a
readability/discussionability thing. I can't respond to his blog post
here.
> We all appreciate the sharing of a diverse array of opinions and experiences
> and that helps us find the truth, but i would counsel you that you can will
> more value from this community by working with this community and not
> against the people in it.
I can't imagine what is wrong with lively/friendly debate. That's all
I'm engaging in.
And FWIW, I'm not going to change my personality based on who's
listening. I'll be myself, and if you don't like me, sure fine, I
don't mind, but if you do, then also fine. I'm not going to act
differently just to be 'friends' with a few 'influential' people. I'd
prefer to be myself and make useful contacts in that fashion.
At least that way you know that when you're dealing with me it's me;
it's not a facade or a trick to try and get your money or earn your
trust to take something from you. It's just me.
Now there's an interesting comment on "authenticity" which everyone
always bangs on about in "social media"...
I'll admit I haven't had much to do with you silky, and in the past
I've found some of your comments I've read on this list to be abrupt
bordering on dismissive of others. Obviously that's just you though,
so kudos for "keeping it real" or whatever the hell it is the kids
these days say.
And it's a nice segue back to the topic of job ads and whether
employers actually treat their developers like rockstars, gurus or
ninjas once you get them in the door and on the payroll?
I don't believe I did that though; I was just saying that his
reference to his blog post was mostly promotional, and secondarily
informational. I'm happy to see and read the information (here, in
this list) and respond, in context, but if it's about promotion, I'm
not interested. I consider it "rude" to hide promotion, so I responded
in an "abrupt" manner, trying to cut it off.
> Best regards, Andrew
>
> Andrew Boyd fac...@gmail.com
> http://uxbookclub.org -- connect, read, discuss
--
noon silky
http://www.boxofgoodfeelings.com/
That's what I was trying to highlight. I was just trying to show that
experienced people won't enjoy being called a "Ninja". Younger kids,
python/ruby/php types may like it, but it doesn't sit well with me. I
was just trying to make sure that was clear.
> Now recruiters are a different topic. 80%-90% of recruiters are
> transactional based, ie they get paid for placing a candidate they advertise
> on Seek and have little knowledge of the industry. Then there is the rest,
> your search and selection, headhunters if you will. They exist both inside
> organisations and in agencies. These are the guys you want to work with,
> both from an employer and job seeker. In Melbourne Charles Young (@cmyoung)
> and Georgie Carpenter (@goergierecruits) are the search & selection type, in
> Sydney you have the Happener boys.
>
> BTW a job thread here is great.
>
> Rgds
> Michael
> PS I have an eBook on this stuff for purchase as well, sorry Noony I
> couldn't help it ;-).
No probs; I'll trade you one eBook for one Box of Good Feelings :D
> Michael Specht
> Principal Consultant
>
> Phone: +61 3 9017 1865 | Mobile: 0418 212 041 | Skype: mspecht
> Email: mic...@inspecht.com.au Web: inspecht.com.au
>
> Want to know the latest trends in HR, Recruitment and Technology?
> Attend the Inspecht HR Futures Conference
--
noon silky
http://www.boxofgoodfeelings.com/
I guess we software developers are sensitive to labelling -
self-identification or peer identification are one thing, but when it
comes from someone outside of the group, it often comes off as
contrived. I can think of plenty of other cultures where there are
terms which are verboten to those outside the group...
As for fitting the existing culture - my opinion is this: if any org
writes a job ad or position description and doesn't check to see
whether it would catch the eye of their existing developers, they've
got rocks in their head. This would also pick up the glaringly obvious
mistakes that make the advertisers look stupid, like asking for more
experience in a technology than is even possible, etc.
What's wrong with saying that, rather than trying to sex it up and
sound cool with terms like rockstar, ninja, guru, etc? I identify more
with that description than with the title "ninja" or anything like
that.
As for the money, let's face it, most of the people who are trying to
hire rockstars don't have more than session muso budgets... ;-)
hahahaha. nice :D
That's what I was trying to highlight. I was just trying to show that
experienced people won't enjoy being called a "Ninja". Younger kids,
python/ruby/php types may like it, but it doesn't sit well with me. I
was just trying to make sure that was clear.
You needed to add "GET OFF MY LAWN, YA YOUNG WHIPPER-SNAPPERS!" to
complete the image. So close.
Out of interest, what do you think of GoodBarry's website & corporate
image in general? Do you think it's childish and unprofessional? You
said you wouldn't dream of acting any differently to your normal self
on this mailing list, perhaps the same can be said for GoodBarry and
their corporate identity? Not only are their job advertisements
playful, so is their entire website! While that might seem abrasive to
you, it gels very well with me ( pity I'm not a .NET developer ;-) ).
I think we just belong to different generations - I belong to a newer
generation of "developer" who don't really mind what we're called.
"Software engineer" certainly doesn't describe what I do, since if
that's all I did then why would I be subscribe to a startup and
business-focused mailing list? It's hard to imagine vibrant young
companies wanting "software engineers" anymore; they can just as
easily find themselves someone who's creative and technically /
business savvy.
Cheers,
Nathan de Vries // nathandevries.com
I know this wasn't aimed at me but what I'd say is that if they're
consistent to the point where the actual position description,
business cards or org chart show "code ninja" then sure, I'll buy it!
If not, it's just marketing isn't it?
In the case of GoodBarry, I don't find it a complete turn off because
it seems consistent with the image they present, but I'd guess they're
an exception, not the rule. Other cases where the job ads don't mesh
with the public image of the company, it just comes off as more
recruiter wank-speak.
I know this wasn't aimed at me but what I'd say is that if they're
consistent to the point where the actual position description,
business cards or org chart show "code ninja" then sure, I'll buy it!
Because the people who they want like being called rockstar or ninja.
If you don't then you are probably not the right person for the job.
i think this is somewhat apropos: http://xkcd.com/486/ :-)
Love it.I'd just like to chip in here about Silky. (In response to someone telling him off). I'm guessing here but a few people who read Silky's emails take offence to them. I know Silky from another elist (never met him in real life, but I look forward to the day. I think I shall hug him).Now I know Silky probably doesn't need me to step in to defend him or anything but meh. Silky comes across as a blunt, tactless, opinionated, righteous, know it all who doesn't care what anyone thinks. He's awesome, and a fresh breath of air in an otherwise stale online world. He says it how he sees it and doesn't apoligise for existing. He owns his place on the planet. We could all learn something from him. (note: Tact and subtlety are not among the list of somethings.)For those here who take offence to what Silky says, remember he's just doing what hes doing. You are the one who is taking offence to what he is saying. How could you be responsible for that? :)Perhaps you need to go and take a big long hard look at yourself. Life is not that serious, there's no evidence to support that it is. Grin and move on, he's just being self expressed. I admire him for it. And for the record, people who I've met who say they have met him in real life say he's a nice guy and nothing like how he comes across online. :) Oh, and he really knows his stuff. Very smart guy.nuff said. we return you to your regular programming. :)cheers,Stephen
Damn! I knew I was forgetting something.
> Out of interest, what do you think of GoodBarry's website & corporate
> image in general? Do you think it's childish and unprofessional? You
> said you wouldn't dream of acting any differently to your normal self
> on this mailing list, perhaps the same can be said for GoodBarry and
> their corporate identity? Not only are their job advertisements
> playful, so is their entire website! While that might seem abrasive to
> you, it gels very well with me ( pity I'm not a .NET developer ;-) ).
Don't get me wrong; I wasn't really being too critical of their target
audience; I just wanted to make sure that they *KNEW* by using the
word "Ninja" it *limits* them to that audience. That I was
specifically turned away. I'm not saying their audience doesn't have
their place, and that their childish and unprofessional (though, I do
partially think that deep-down, and may have slightly mentioned it
later :D
> I think we just belong to different generations - I belong to a newer
> generation of "developer" who don't really mind what we're called.
Maybe, but I wouldn't be surprised if we're the same age. Or pretty
close. Though I am sort of getting old I guess ...
> "Software engineer" certainly doesn't describe what I do, since if
> that's all I did then why would I be subscribe to a startup and
> business-focused mailing list? It's hard to imagine vibrant young
> companies wanting "software engineers" anymore; they can just as
> easily find themselves someone who's creative and technically /
> business savvy.
Sure; but I don't think "Ninja" covers what you do :) I'm the same, I
have interests outside engineering; but if I was taking a *job* (not
running my own business) "Ninja" wouldn't cut it for *me*.
> Cheers,
>
> Nathan de Vries // nathandevries.com
--
noon silky
http://www.boxofgoodfeelings.com/
Sad to hear it. I'm sure we're all got stories of how cancer has affected us.
> - for something (quoting a
> URL) that I do myself. I am not sure that this is a case of over-reaction -
> if it were any other list, I would probably have gone out of my way to be
> specifically and deliberately offensive.
>
> Cheers, Andrew
--
noon silky
http://www.boxofgoodfeelings.com/
I laughed out loud at this.
> For those here who take offence to what Silky says, remember he's just doing
> what hes doing. You are the one who is taking offence to what he is saying.
> How could you be responsible for that? :)
> Perhaps you need to go and take a big long hard look at yourself. Life is
> not that serious, there's no evidence to support that it is. Grin and move
> on, he's just being self expressed. I admire him for it. And for the record,
> people who I've met who say they have met him in real life say he's a nice
> guy and nothing like how he comes across online. :) Oh, and he really knows
> his stuff. Very smart guy.
> nuff said. we return you to your regular programming. :)
Man .. Stephen ... your money is in the red letter box ... *wink* *wink*
> cheers,
> Stephen