Interface L2 Interlude Download
Leann Siter
If you work with technologists, you might have seen them using an interface like this. This kind of simple, text-based interface is called a shell, and it has been a common way to interface with computers ever since the first screens and keyboards were created.
Not all technical users will use a shell regularly, but there are many who will spend the bulk of their time in such an interface. It is such a crucial skill to be able to operate one effectively that I have been writing this series primarily to show ways to be more efficient with this kind of interface.
A terminal is just a program that reads input from the keyboard, passes that input to another program (normally a shell), and displays the results on the screen. A shell program on its own does not do this - it requires a terminal as an interface.
Why the word terminal? This makes sense when you look at how people interfaced with computers historically. Input to a computer might be through punch cards, and output would often be via a printer. The Teletype Termimal8 became a common way for users to interface with computers.
Not all shells are created equal - anyone can write a shell program, maybe creating a simple interface to the computer or a highly complex one with many features. In fact, a later article in this series will look at the geneology of the most common shells.
The first systemd process is the primary process for the OS - it is process number 1, which initialises everything else. The second systemd process is the process that is running the interface for my user. We can ignore these for now; they are internals to how the operating system boots and starts processes.
This looks different from previous examples. The program, which shows the familiar Windows interface, explorer.exe, is in fact a shell as well, offering interactive access to the operating system and computer resources. The bulk of the Windows APIs to interact with this interface are in the Shell Library. I also maintain a popular library for building extensions to the graphical Windows shell - sharpshell.
This screenshot, from MSDN: Frequently Asked Questions about Windows Subsystem for Linux shows Bash running in Windows. This is a relatively new feature at the time of writing, allowing Windows users to use a Linux interface to the PC. This is a feature that may become increasingly valuable, as in general it is challenging to write shell code that can run on Windows and Unix-like systems.
Welcome to the new interface for the MSU Libraries catalog! The EDS interface will remain available at as an alternative. You can help us improve our new interface by providing feedback and suggestions!
There are a few minor nuances in the current functionality.
I also want to add new functions such as Party Control, displaying a profession icon for each class in the clan window.
ALT CLICK on the buff icon and so on
Decompiling interface.u gives many errors due to obfuscation =(
"Lee Interlude" was a live show interlude performed by Linkin Park during the Hybrid Theory touring cycle in 2001. The interlude first appeared on setlists as "Dialog: #31" in early January 2001 before it became "Lee Interlude" on the Street Soldiers Tour.
"Papercut" has been a staple in Linkin Park setlists since 2000 as it is one of the band's favorite songs. Throughout the first half of 2000, it served as the opening song, after a shortened version of "Cure For The Itch". After "A Place For My Head" took over as the show opener for the latter half of the year it moved down to a mid-set position. In 2001, the band added an interlude before the song, entitled the "LEE Interlude", which was performed until the George, Washington show of Ozzfest. At the show in East Troy, Wisconsin, "With You" was preceded by the "LEE Interlude" for the only time. At the band's late night performance at Rock im Park, "Points Of Authority" had some extensions added on to it: before the song, the "LEE Interlude" was performed - instead of coming before "Papercut". Mike also performed an extended beatbox intro before the song.
Creating interfaces that are easily understood by humans puts us product designers right up against the sad fact that computers are lazy. They don't care about helping people understand what's new, what to do next, or how to react when something goes wrong.
Surprise! It's time for a brief interlude in Internet history. Back in 2004, Basecamp, the company-formerly-known-as-37signals, wrote, for me, a groundbreaking piece entitled "The Three State Solution." (And no, this isn't a plan to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict). They outlined that every screen should consider three possible states: "regular, blank, and error." This blew my mind. And changed how I thought about design for the web forever.
Why a messaging app? Because it's not an immediately obvious example of these states at play. But I think it's a great example of how even temporal UIs like messaging interfaces follow the rules of the UI Stack. And, even further, it's an illustration of how immense our responsibility is to ensure that each screen's states flow smoothly from one to another.
This is a lot of info to get at once, but this pretty much covers all the things you want a mock to be doing. Most mocks have many functions for the interface they cover, but each function will more or less follow this exact format.
Mocks are versions of your classes and services which conform to the same protocol (interface) as the \u2018real\u2019 versions. These are dependency-injected into the classes which you\u2019re testing and allow you fine-tune behaviour. You can do things like:
Remember, by mocking out the API we should be able to replicate the behaviour of the real API, but control all the results. Here\u2019s the protocol (interface if you\u2019re a fan of Kotlin) for the API:
We've built three primary components of the "Spaces of the Hilltop" site for readers and viewers to explore. While linear documents predominate, they describe an unexpected and often surprising project. The mapping imagery of the web interface is an attempt to illustrate the surprising element of the Hilltop project. The map is not "accurate." It shows real streets and highways in, around, and in-between the Ohio State University and the Hilltop community, but it is not intended to provide directions. Instead the map is explored through the web interface as a metaphor for the heterotopic spaces of the Hilltop: spaces of real geographies with alternative voices and local histories. A map may show a "place" (Michel de Certeau, 1988), fixed and accurate, but our map aims to show a shifting, morphing space through the layers of faces, buildings, and satellite images that begin to visualize the spaces of the Hilltop.
Similar to the many spaces of the Hilltop, the web interface tells the stories of the Hilltop project through different forms: streaming videos and an article more typical of academic writing. The article is available to navigate in a linear fashion, and a list of the streaming videos is also available. As you read, sample the Hilltop stories and imagine what "work" the storytellers are accomplishing with their narratives.
For a "nonlinear" experience, use the graphical map that extends to the right and below and trace some spaces of the Hilltop as your finger might trace routes on a map. Click on links that will allow you to read sections of the essay and explore the videos as they are juxtaposed throughout the web interface.
Technical requirements: Your browser will need to run Javascript code and allow popup windows in order to experience the map. All media are played using the Flash plugin.
This is the second of the "interludes" which end each section of the book. These interludes give flavour, concepts, context and the history of some of the concepts we're dealing with. These interlude are not essential to mastering the skills of the shell, but you might find them interesting.
In this interlude we'll actually look at what a shell is, all the way from the highest level, which non-technical readers will be able to comfortably follow, to the low level, which advanced users may find illuminating.
It might come as a surprise that many technical computer users (programmers, data scientists, systems administrators etc) spend a lot of time using an interface which looks like it's from the sixties:
The operating system is the piece of software installed on a computer that can interface with the hardware. Without hardware, such as a CPU, memory, a network adapter, a graphics card, disk drives and so on, there's not much that you can do with the computer. The operating system is the primary interface to this hardware. No normal programs will talk to hardware directly - the operating system abstracts this hardware away and provides a software interface to it.
The abstraction the operating system provides is essential. Developers don't need to know the specifics of how to work with individual devices from different vendors; the operating system provides a standardised interface to all of this. It also handles various tasks such as making sure the system starts up properly.
So a shell is a user-space program to interface with the computer. But there a few more moving parts than just a shell we are seeing in the image above. There are different types of shells, there are terminal programs, and there are the programs or commands that the shell calls (in the example above, tree is a program). Let's pick these apart.
dafc88bca6