[Shinken-devel] Current work on Livestatus & monitoring checks survey ^^

[nap]

Hi,

I'm currently working on a module tuning that an help lot of people here :)

The goal is to make livestatus module (for UIs like Thruk, MK/multisite or Adagios) run better with:

* manage more queries on the same time

* use all CPU cores (currently it doesn't)

* make each queries quicker

I did reach the first two items on a POC, and I'm still working on the third one (the hardest one :p )

Related to this, I did create a survey focus on monitoring checks and especially important/less important one on the same host:  http://t.co/OGsoMi5thR

Please answer to it and forward it to others admins you know ^^

the goal is to see if allowing two levels of service objects can be a good idea or not (important and less important ones).

I'll do a blog post about it when I'll have enough returns for it :)

You still didn't click on it? so I give you the link again :D

http://t.co/OGsoMi5thR

Thanks a lot :)

Jean 

[Sven Nierlein]

Hi Jean,

I am missing an answer for the "What if such "lower" importance checks can be hidden by default on the "services" view?"

- i am using this in thruk already[1]

Cheers ;-),
Sven

[1] http://thruk.org/documentation/configuration.html#default_service_filter

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Shinken-devel mailing list
> Shinke...@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Shinken-devel mailing list
Shinke...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel

[nap]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Sven Nierlein <sv...@nierlein.de> wrote:

Hi Jean,

I am missing an answer for the "What if such "lower" importance checks can be hidden by default on the "services" view?"

 - i am using this in thruk already[1]

Cheers ;-),
 Sven

[1] http://thruk.org/documentation/configuration.html#default_service_filter

Like always you rocks ^^

The idea was to also manage it on the core part, to manage such services in a light way, and so automatically skip them in lot of part, especially the basic LS part and only list them if you are listng this specific host. It's a bit strange as behavior but can tune lot of queries ^^

Jean

[Hermann Lauer]

Hello All,

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:50:10PM +0100, nap wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Sven Nierlein <sv...@nierlein.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > I am missing an answer for the "What if such "lower" importance checks can
> > be hidden by default on the "services" view?"
> >
> > - i am using this in thruk already[1]

just to get informed (had very little time) - is there any plan
for a more pythonic interface to the configuration in the meantime ?

Just dreaming about changing the configuration on the fly due to manipulating
unimportant services away or changing notifications or adding/removing hosts
etc...

If there are already such mechanism in place, I would be thankfull
for any hints and sorry if I missed something more or less obvious.

Many thanks for your work,
greetings
Hermann

P.S: Just noted that in git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-shinken/shinken.git
since February version 2.2 is available (Thanks, Thibault) and even
2.4-BETA1 is checked in - if those would appear on packages.debian.org,
I think the testing and spreading of shinken will increase.
Will start to test that stuff now.

--
Netzwerkadministration/Zentrale Dienste, Interdiziplinaeres
Zentrum fuer wissenschaftliches Rechnen der Universitaet Heidelberg
IWR; INF 368; 69120 Heidelberg; Tel: (06221)54-8236 Fax: -5224
Email: Herman...@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de