Hi Katy,
>
> Hi Mannie (and Finn),
>
> Its looking nice!
Thank you for the feedback, we really appreciate it.
> I like the idea of finding a shim by the flanking services. I think a
> nice addition to this would be to find all the shims that have been
> linked to a particular service (i.e. by trawling over existing
> workflows
> as well as by looking at semantic types and data formats)
The support for extraction of services linked to a beanshell and vice
versa has been built into the gems (but has not been perfected yet).
However, we do not have enough information to conclude whether the
linked services are shims or not. What things, specific to shim
services that do not apply to non-shim services, should we look out
for? In addition, could you please give a few examples of shim
services; some that you know are definitely shims, and some that you
suspect to be shims.
> A search by input/output data format/semantic type would be useful
Do you mean filtering down results to a more specific criteria (in
effect, an advanced search option), or do you mean something else?
> A field for example inputs and outputs would also be handy
We will look into this soon.
> Cheers,
>
> Katy
Regards,
Mannie