Nate Klingenstein wrote:
> It needs to be published manually at present. The IdP only generates
> metadata during installation, whereas the SP generates it dynamically by
> checking its own configuration. I don't think there'd be anything wrong
> with setting up the alias you describe, so long as you're aware that as
> you make configuration changes, you'll need to manually change the
> metadata to match.
I think 2.1 includes the beginnings of something in the IdP, though I
believe for the moment it just returns the metadata that you load into the
IdP about the IdP. In effect the same as setting up an alias, but it's built-in.
-- Scott