Open space preserved %

0 views
Skip to first unread message

thomas harbinson

unread,
1:54 PM (5 hours ago) 1:54 PM
to Unknown
See the article below that talks about the percentage of land preserved within the state of Connecticut per the the goals from the Connecticut deep. 

I was wondering at what percentage have we achieved for land preserved as open space.  In my mind that would include land where development rights have been purchased or lands conserved via the state centennial watershed but not open space properties where there is no deed restriction protecting it forever as open space. 

As the definition in people's minds of what open space is, I think it is of value to delineate or detail our definition for an open space plan.

.CT is rapidly acquiring property but is still years away from goal https://share.google/lCqSmQ4detuxv8oEf


Tom Harbinson
Tel: 203SirTomH

Teresa Gallagher

unread,
2:53 PM (4 hours ago) 2:53 PM
to shel...@googlegroups.com

Harder than it sounds. That’s what NVCOG ran into when they began putting together their open space map for the region. How are you going to define what is protected open space? Because if it’s strictly by deed restrictions, then Indian Well State Park is not protected open space, for example. Also a number of our open space lands and conservation easements would not qualify. There will be a filed map showing that an area is “open space” or protected by a “conservation easement to be filed”, but then you look and there is nothing on file. Or maybe there is a conservation easement on file, but it’s an easement that has so many exceptions that people can do almost anything except put a building there.  There are so many shades of gray. And then lets say you decide not to include properties for which you can’t find a rigorous deed. Moving forward, could someone interpret that as implicit permission to put up a shed or clear the trees there? What are the unintended consequences of saying a list of properties are not fully protected? I don’t think you can go back and deed-restrict them.

 

Also, sometimes I look for a deed and I can’t find anything. But I’m not a title-researcher, so there might actually be something on file that I just couldn’t find.

 

From: shel...@googlegroups.com <shel...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of thomas harbinson
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 1:54 PM
To: Unknown <shel...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: SheltonCC Open space preserved %

 

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Shelton Conservation Commission" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sheltoncc+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sheltoncc/CAG%2BbH5C9hcTyzbfrhJ6peM89KcRo2QjP_bHnc-D2t-0jxeArQA%40mail.gmail.com.

Teresa Gallagher

unread,
3:04 PM (4 hours ago) 3:04 PM
to shel...@googlegroups.com

By the way, I was just working on a spreadsheet of conservation/pedestrian easements for cross-referencing the files in case GIS is not available (attached). This version is organized by street and includes the agricultural PDRs, private open space, buffer areas that can be clear but not built on, etc.  I found the majority of these by flipping through every filed map one at a time, so they are in the cabinets sorted by the number of the filed map in most cases.

 

From: shel...@googlegroups.com <shel...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of thomas harbinson
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 1:54 PM
To: Unknown <shel...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: SheltonCC Open space preserved %

 

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.



--

2026 Conservation Easements table.xls

thomas harbinson

unread,
3:14 PM (4 hours ago) 3:14 PM
to shel...@googlegroups.com
Interesting.  I fear that sometime in the future, the value of efforts to acquire or preserve these parcels from an environmental perspective or purpose for passive recreation, might be lost.  Can the Open Space dedication from Summerfield Gardens be considered as a school bus parking lot?  There is a "preservation" aspect to some parcels, and a "conservation" aspect to reserve them from development so they can serve a future use (Wiacek Farm - expansion of sports fields)

If we define some goal of 15% as open space, how close are we to meeting it?  Does it become a fungible target if the definition of "open space" changes?  Do we define that term in our OS Plan, identifying the accomplishments to date in a table/grid?  Would it be helpful for us to define the terms of Open Space, including some sub-delineations, for 06484 rather than some broader NVCG thoughts on what they mean?  I can't see why the owner of a property couldn't place the deed restriction upon itself.  Why couldn't the State of CT deed restrict Indian Wells State Park to always be a State Park?

The review of an OSPLan should be thorough, because few of us are going to be here in another 16yrs to hash it out.

Tom Harbinson
Tel: 203SirTomH


Teresa Gallagher

unread,
3:34 PM (3 hours ago) 3:34 PM
to shel...@googlegroups.com

My understanding of deed restrictions, at least in the form of easements, is that some other entity needs to be granted the right to enforce that restriction. If you place a restriction on yourself, you can  ignore that restriction because no one was granted the right to enforce it.

 

But if the restriction is in the name of, say, the Nature Conservancy, then you can’t violate the restriction without the approval of the Nature Conservancy. And if you do, the Nature Conservancy can file a lawsuit against you. Typically a conservation easement over private land here is held by the City of Shelton, or maybe the State of Connecticut. So we can enforce that because the easement has provisions for that.  

thomas harbinson

unread,
3:40 PM (3 hours ago) 3:40 PM
to shel...@googlegroups.com
That makes sense.  
Another benefit to having a 3rd party funding when places like Shelton Lakes were purchased and there was a 3rd party grantee now owning the conservation easement in effect.

Tom Harbinson
Tel: 203SirTomH


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages