S3 > utterlyidle

[Matt Savage]

The request signing stuff in shvnmvn seems to naturally live in UI?

Any objections to moving it?

[Raymond Barlow]

I would've only objected if this introduced a new dependency on SM, but it already depends on UI, so, no objection here!

On 4 October 2013 12:32, Matt Savage <matthew...@gmail.com> wrote:

The request signing stuff in shvnmvn seems to naturally live in UI?

Any objections to moving it?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "shavenmaven" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to shavenmaven...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[Daniel Worthington-Bodart]

Yea that's the plan, it was one of the reasons I switched SM to use UI

On 4 Oct 2013 12:32, "Matt Savage" <matthew...@gmail.com> wrote:

The request signing stuff in shvnmvn seems to naturally live in UI?

Any objections to moving it?

--

[Matt Savage]

Figured as much. Alright, I'll do this next week. Need to separate awscredentials a bit- url pattern isn't essential.

I've also got Nick's yadic error message request ready to commit if we're happy with it. Duplicated 3 lines to check for interfaces in ConstructorResolver and StaticMethodResolver, which was the lowest sensible level. Happy with the change?

[Daniel Worthington-Bodart]

Sounds perfect