The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Is Very Near

[Felipe Pérez Martí]

Hi everyone,I wanted to share with you the final version of the article I had sent you earlier as a draft. The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Is Very Near
Why Heaven’s Messages Are Ignored and How Close the Warning Really IsThis is the complete and polished edition. I believe it is very important to share it widely, especially with priests, religious, and all those in the Church who think we should not be concerned about the apocalyptic times we are living in. In the article I address this point directly.It is also worth noting that Pope Leo XIII’s famous vision about the “Century of the Devil” (1884) is real, even though we do not have an official Vatican document on that private revelation. We know it is authentic not only because of the strong Tradition surrounding it and the many documents Pope Leo XIII wrote about the devil and Freemasonry (what he called “the Church of the devil”), but also through a very clear indirect sign: the extraordinary surge in Marian apparitions since that year, something I document in the article with statistics.Our Lady’s apparitions, especially Fatima (the name of the church where I attend Mass here in Seattle), were Heaven’s powerful response. The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary is precisely what will bring an end to the Century of the Devil. It will mark the beginning of the purification during the Great Tribulation and, afterward, the long-awaited Era of Peace.Below I include the Motivation section of the article. The complete document is attached. I also published in our Wiki page: https://www.quehacer.wiki/wiki/The_Triumph_of_the_Immaculate_Heart_of_Mary_Is_Very_Near
I would love to have your comments and suggestions. Best regards and blessings to all,

In Christ and Mary,
Felipe 

The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Is Very Near

Why Heaven’s Messages Are Ignored and How Close the Warning Really Is

Felipe Pérez Martí

Seattle, January 2026 – Edited April 21, 2026

Motivation

Many souls today are asking themselves three important questions: When will the Immaculate Heart of Mary finally triumph? Why have Heaven’s Marian messages been so widely ignored for decades? And is the Warning truly very close?

We have been given a clear vision of the dramatic events that lie ahead: the Warning (Illumination of Conscience), the Miracle, the Great Tribulation, and the long-awaited Era of Peace. These prophecies — transmitted especially through Garabandal, the approved apparitions of Fatima and Akita, and echoed in many other credible Marian messages of our time — are not mere speculation. They are Heaven’s loving and urgent answer to the immense problems humanity faces today.

Humanity stands on the brink of the abyss. Behind the current escalation of global conflicts and the real risk of nuclear war, many credible messages indicate that hidden forces and elites are being influenced more directly than ever by the spirit of the Antichrist. A significant part of the world suffers under a strong demonic influence that only Jesus Christ Himself can fully cast out. Just as a personal exorcism is an act of divine mercy that begins with a powerful intervention and often involves intense struggle before complete deliverance, the Warning marks the beginning of a global spiritual exorcism. The Great Tribulation will be the final and most painful phase of this purification. At its conclusion, Satan and all his demons will be confined to hell for a thousand years (cf. Rev 20). The faithful remnant, protected like Noah’s family in the “arks” of the refuges by the tender maternal care of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, will emerge purified and will help repopulate a renewed world during the promised Era of Peace — an era that many see as the beginning of the Kingdom of the Divine Will on earth.

Some prophecies place these events within a broader historical framework, such as Luisa Piccarreta’s revelations concerning the coming Reign of the Divine Will. In this article we seek to shed additional light on the historical perspective of what is unfolding.

We are living in the final phase of the “Century of the Devil” — the last great attempt by Satan to destroy the Church and annihilate humanity. Yet, precisely in the midst of this intensified attack, Heaven has responded with a powerful and sustained counteroffensive: the dramatic increase in Marian apparitions and messages since 1884.

This is the “middle term” of salvation history. Between the long centuries of relative silence and the final Triumph of the Immaculate Heart, our Heavenly Mother has drawn near to her children with tender yet urgent maternal love. Her apparitions and locutions are not random; they are the deliberate, loving response of the Woman who was promised to crush the serpent’s head (Gen 3:15). Through Fatima and the many subsequent messages, she prepares us, protects us, and leads us toward the definitive victory of her Immaculate Heart.

This article aims to help us understand where we stand in God’s providential plan — not to frighten us, but to awaken us to the seriousness of the hour and to fill us with confident hope. The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart is very close. Let us respond to our Mother’s call with trust, urgency, and love.

--

Felipe

[Felipe Pérez Martí]

Hello everyone,Regarding my article (last version here):
https://www.quehacer.wiki/wiki/El_Triunfo_del_Inmaculado_Coraz%C3%B3n_de_Mar%C3%ADa_Est%C3%A1_Muy_Cerca
As you know, in it I describe how the “Century of the Devil” is in its death throes, and that the prophesied Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary will soon begin in earnest — the moment when she will crush the head of the serpent in these apocalyptic times.
This Triumph will begin with The Warning (the Illumination of Consciences for all humanity). Then will come the General Amnesty (in which each person will have to consciously choose God or the devil), followed by the Great Tribulation (for those who choose the devil), and the Marian Refuges (spiritual bunkers, or Noah’s Arks, for those who choose God in the face of the coming nuclear firestorm).
Finally, the definitive Triumph will arrive with the Era of Peace, which will be close to paradise. In it, “the faithful remnant” who chose God will repopulate the earth, and this period will last a millennium.
Well, there has been an interesting debate about this  with Alejandro Bustamante. I’m sharing his first comment below (as you will notice, he is agnostic, non catholic):

Comment by Alejandro Bustamante – April 25 of this year:Good evening, Felipe and everyone.This is a very interesting text.
However, I was left waiting for dates, times, or moments… I’m not sure how to refer to it — some kind of temporal framework for the development of the apocalyptic process you describe.
To clarify, I quote one line from your message:
“Why have the messages from Heaven been ignored, and how close is the Warning really?”
My interest, if you will, is journalistic — in the sense of wanting to know information I consider very important. I wouldn’t call it scientific, as that would be an exaggeration, but I do recognize my intellectual curiosity on the subject.
I speak to you with complete seriousness. There is no irony in my comment. I know you believe and have absolute faith in what you affirm, and I absolutely respect your right to that freedom of belief.
Regarding the first part of your question, I see no epistemological problem. One can apply the hypothetical-deductive method and arrive at an explanation. It would be similar to asking, for example, “Why is phenomenon XX more prevalent in Venezuela than in other parts of the world?”
In that sense, applying the method:

1. We observe and ask a question. (“Why have the messages been ignored…?”)
2. We formulate a tentative, coherent, and falsifiable explanation. This is the hypothesis. (“The messages have been ignored because XXX…”)
3. The hypothesis is tested through observation and real-world data. (Does the data corroborate or refute the proposed reason?)
4. If the data contradicts the hypothesis, it is discarded or reformulated.
5. If the hypothesis survives, it is considered explanatory, while recognizing its provisional nature. There are no absolute truths in science.

However, regarding the second part — “How close is the Warning really?” — I read your article twice on www.quehacer.wiki and I don’t find any exact answer (I understand that only God knows), nor even an estimated one with some degree of probability (I understand this may be difficult).
Still, I believe many of us (or at least some) are vitally interested in preparing ourselves, since this is ultimately a matter of eternal life or death, whatever form each person’s preparation may take.
I imagine it’s the same anguished question a terminal patient asks: “Doctor, how much time do I have left?”
Some will choose to enjoy life to the fullest, others will become depressed, others will turn to prayer. The responses are almost infinite.
Each person will live the process differently depending on their context and temperament. But the situation is the same for everyone. We face the unknown, the uncertain, the indeterminate. And that causes fear and unease. Yet, whether we like it or not, time moves forward.
Some will face the end (I hope) with resignation, as something natural, valuing what they have lived and built. Others will react completely differently. Some will believe they are moving on to eternal life. But the process must continue. It is inevitable. It is natural… and divine, or divine… and natural.
Once again, I repeat: my comment is made with complete seriousness. And therefore, even though I understand that the nature of prophecies and apocalyptic revelations carries an enigmatic, opaque, and hermetic quality, I would appreciate a bit more clarity… if possible.
Regarding the text itself, it is an excellent religious manifesto, a powerful eschatological theological essay. It is very persuasive, using statistics to give quantitative support to a spiritual affirmation. Within its own belief system, it has strong internal coherence. It projects a sense of order by predicting what “will happen” in the midst of the current chaotic world. It reinforces a sense of belonging to the “chosen” group. It offers a positive ending. It transforms fear into hope through spiritual preparation.
Finally, I must reiterate that I believe in the inherent human right we all have to express, share, and confront our own philosophical, ideological, political, and theological positions. What must always prevail is respect for the dignity, integrity, and moral worth of every person. Positions will always be subject to opposition and criticism…
Good night.

--

Felipe

[Felipe Pérez Martí]

I didn't send the English version, sorry about that. Here it is: 

https://www.quehacer.wiki/wiki/The_Triumph_of_the_Immaculate_Heart_of_Mary_Is_Very_Near

Best and blessings, 

In Jesus and Mary, 

--

Felipe

[Felipe Pérez Martí]

My first comment to Alejandro – Sunday, April 26Hello Alejandro. Sorry for the delay. I’ve been very busy, and I use my breaks to watch pleasant things (like the math video I just shared). One key point I should have made clearer: the trigger or detonator of the Warning is nuclear war. God is not going to allow His most precious creation — humanity — to be destroyed. That war would represent the peak of satanic dominion on earth. It’s like a possessed person walking toward a cliff leading to an abyss — not by their own will, but driven by the demon possessing them. That is what is happening with humanity right now. It’s as if a person under demonic possession is about to throw themselves off the cliff, and then they are exorcised. Upon returning to normality in their spirit and mind, they realize what was really happening and decide not to jump.Something similar happens with humanity. But there are many people. After the collective exorcism (the Warning), some will decide not to jump — that is the faithful remnant. Others will still choose to jump because they are so far from God that, even without being possessed, the “love of the world” weighs too heavily on them: addictions to drugs, pornography, etc. That’s why it’s good to work on breaking those chains.However, doing it alone through ascetic effort is practically impossible. With God’s help, it is possible. I’ll try to send you the complete document on God’s Plan for salvation, where each stage is explained in detail. Everything makes sense. One more thing: it is not a fixed timetable. It depends on human actions, like an interactive “game.” Prophecies are not the same as scientific predictions. One is spiritual and the other is “scientific.” But we know that the first encompasses the second in a very profound way. I’ll continue later. Sorry again.

---

My second intervention – Sunday, April 26Hello again, Alejandro. I’m replying to you in parts because I’m in a hurry. I may put together a more complete response later. For now, I’m sending you this important document where I explain God’s Plan for these times. In it I include some dates (I believe the Warning will occur this year due to the imminence of nuclear war):https://www.quehacer.wiki/wiki/God%27s_Plan_for_Apocalyptic_Times

--

Felipe

[Felipe Pérez Martí]

My comments (Sunday, April 26) before replying to his latest message
(I’ll send you the rest later to close the debate)1. My first comment (Sunday 26)Hello, Alejandro.No need to apologize. On the contrary, these are very good questions. I think I’ll be able to reply to this (and perhaps the rest) between today and tomorrow.Right from the start, there are two important things to clarify:

1. Some prophecies are warnings and calls to action (conversion). They are conditional.
2. Others are not. They are Divine Decrees — irrevocable.

Examples of Divine Decrees: the first coming of Jesus (we could not redeem ourselves on our own), the Second Coming (the end of the world), and the Era of Peace (the millennium of peace). The Warning and the Great Tribulation are part of what we call the “intermediate coming” or the Judgment of the Nations. There are three main judgments:

• The Judgment of Jerusalem (destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D., after the death of Jesus).
• The Judgment of the Nations (the one we are living through now, with the current crisis and nuclear risk).
• The Final Judgment (end of the world and new creation).

Everything follows a logic that respects man’s free will and, of course, the devil’s as well. The latter is decisive when it comes to the “Divine Decrees.” I’ll continue when I return.2. My second intervention (Sunday 26)Hello again, Alejandro. I’m replying in parts because I’m a bit pressed for time. I may put together a more complete response later. For now, I’m sending you this important document in which I explain God’s Plan for these times. It includes some dates (I believe the Warning may occur this year due to the imminence of nuclear war):→ God’s Plan for the Apocalyptic Times

---

Now my current response to Alejandro’s philosophical concerns:Hello again, Alejandro.Thank you for your detailed message and for reasoning with such seriousness and honesty. This is something we should greatly value among ourselves, for the sake of a greater Venezuela and the whole world. We want a high-level dialogue, just as you are promoting.I will reply to you directly and with my best effort in the same spirit.First, let me pick up on something I mentioned earlier for context:
There are two types of prophecies:

1. Conditional warnings: “If you do not convert…” They depend on people’s free response (as in the case of Nineveh).
2. Divine Decrees: These are irrevocable. Examples: the first coming of Jesus, the Second Coming (end of the world), and the Era of Peace (the millennium of peace after the Great Tribulation).

The Warning and the Great Tribulation form part of the “intermediate coming” or Judgment of the Nations. According to the teaching of Fr. Javier Luzón, there are three main judgments: that of Jerusalem, that of the Nations (the current one), and the Final Judgment.On your logical and philosophical questionI fully understand your point: if everything depends on human decisions and the devil’s actions, then it seems God is “subject to systemic uncertainty,” like a manager who doesn’t fully control his company. Where does His omnipotence and omniscience stand?The Christian answer is this:
God does have a plan, but that plan deeply respects the freedom He Himself gave to His creatures (humans and angels, including the fallen ones). It is not mechanical determinism. It is more like a Father who has a beautiful life project for His children, but does not force them to follow it. However, He does set limits — “red lines.” He will not allow humanity to completely self-destruct, nor will He allow Satan to win definitively. That is why the Warning exists: it is the merciful intervention before collective demonic possession leads humanity into the nuclear abyss.God does not “play dice” (as Einstein once asked), but He does interact with free creatures.
Conditional prophecies are real warnings. Unconditional ones (Decrees) are divine certainties. The Apocalypse is not a horoscope. It is a combination of urgent warning + promise of final victory.According to my follow-up of the most consistent prophecies, the Warning can occur at any moment in 2026, because we are in the final phase of the “Century of the Devil” and the nuclear risk is real and growing. God is not going to allow us to destroy His most precious creation.On the incentive dilemmaI understand your observation: it seems that “for the Era of Peace to come, many people need to behave badly.” But that is only looking at one part of the picture. God does not need evil to fulfill His plan. The Era of Peace will come in spite of evil, not because of it. The faithful remnant (those who convert) is more than enough to repopulate the renewed earth. Those who freely choose to reject God will suffer the consequences, but God does not depend on their wickedness.It is similar to the Cross: the greatest evil (the death of the Son of God) became the greatest victory. God brings good out of evil, but that does not mean He desires it.In summaryProphecies do prophesy, but within the logic of a personal God who respects freedom. They are not infallible scientific predictions, but urgent calls from a Father who wants to save us.I’m sending you again the link to the updated document on God’s Plan, where I explain the stages in greater detail. I think that with these points clarified, it may make more sense now.By the way, the devil can make excellent predictions (the best in the world), because he has superior intelligence, knows all available evidence, and even the plans of world leaders. But he cannot make prophecies in the strict sense of the word. That is an exclusive grace of God.Cordially,
Felipe

--

Felipe

[Felipe Pérez Martí]

Sorry for interrupting the debate. Here are Alejandro’s comments, very important:2A. Alejandro Monday April 27Hello Felipe. Thank you for replying. I understand your explanation from the linguistic and communicational point of view.But there is something that bothers me from the philosophical point of view. And I say philosophical because one of its pillars is logic, which I try to apply to your explanation. This logic is undoubtedly closely connected with the world around us, the one in which we operate regularly. The day-to-day world. The one in which it is logical to take care of oneself and not to fall or jump from a building if one wants to continue living.So, following that same logic…Regarding the biblical scriptures and what they narrate or prophesy about the end of the world, the Apocalypse… is it something like it can or could happen, but it is not certain? Does it depend on what humanity does or does not do, and in that way, God would act accordingly?If it is that way, then that scheme of functioning falls within the “normal”, the way the world works, physical material reality. I see nothing preternatural, and much less supernatural. That is the natural state of things. They may or may not happen, depending on multiple factors. It is the same “dynamic” of physics, chemistry, biology, psychology and sociology of “this world”, not the dynamic of the “alternate world” that Catholic theology presents, which “deviates” and has shortcuts with respect to attachment to rational logic. It would be like the case of a manager who thinks and affirms that he will close his company because things are very bad. But for X or Y reasons the work climate improves, processes are optimized and therefore results improve and the company stays afloat. All of that is part of this world, there is no divine intervention. At least not rationally verifiable with the rules of logic. If the analogy is valid, God would be like the manager, subject to systemic uncertainty.But in that way, considering the above, biblical prophecies lose their predictive capacity. Since what is expressed there may or may not happen. That is, there is a certain probability.This seems like a contradiction to me. A prophecy that does not prophesy?Furthermore, we must “thank God” for “having granted us” the ability to do statistical calculations to predict with a certain precision, and margin of error, the occurrence of future events. It should be noted that such predictive results are fallible, there are no absolutely valid results, they are questionable. Therefore, we could make estimates about the probability of the Apocalypse occurring, since it depends on physical, material facts of this world. Behaving well, loving each other, taking care of each other, praying, etc…The contradiction is summarized in:

1. The definition of prophecy is the announcement of an event before it occurs.
2. The biblical prophecies announce the occurrence of the apocalyptic event.
3. The apocalypse depends on situations that may or may not occur in the spiritual world, as well as its correlate in the physical world.
   C: Prophecies do not prophesy, since the definition is not fulfilled.

Seen this way, we could affirm that the prophecies refer to stochastic, probabilistic events.Seen the above, the prophecies seem more like a warning. Something similar to how mom used to tell us: “If you keep messing around…, I’m going to give you a spanking.” If we continue, we get the spanking… If we don’t continue, we are saved.In this case, the apocalyptic prophecy is acting within a risk management system, and the gaps, such as sin and free will, must be mitigated. And the biblical text, which the manager, God, discloses to us, is the risk report addressed to humanity. Or it could also be seen, philosophically speculating, as the expression of a “business model” based on dependence. By the way, eternal, infinite dependence. The earthly example is elevator maintenance. An unethical technician has the incentive to never completely eliminate the equipment failures in order to have to repeat his “maintenance” visits. And even worse, he could say: “It is recommended that you hire our XYZ service for this equipment, since there is a risk of a catastrophic failure.” Why would an omnipotent designer create a system that is intrinsically vulnerable, highly prone to errors, being suspiciously the only authorized technician to repair it?On the other hand, seen the above with respect to a probable but not certain Apocalypse, how would all that about the 1,000 years of Peace remain? That is, we behave well, there is no end of the world, and therefore we do not go to the “other world”, where we will be “better”.There we have a dilemma. We want, it suits us, all the good things of the “other world”, but to go there, from the individual point of view, what suits us is that the majority “behaves badly”, that the apocalyptic destruction does occur. But, at the same time, since we are living in this world, we must act (love each other, tolerate each other, respect each other) ethically, in the correct way (Dad asks for it, among others), knowing that with that behavior we unfortunately lose the theological goal of eternal life. I don’t understand… There is a failure of incentives…Honestly, God does complicate things. Or is it that the Universe is so complicated that even God has a hard time understanding it and being able to develop his “plan”. In that he is just like us, or we are like him… It seems that God is also subject to systemic uncertainty.And that God has the “advantage” of designing, planning and executing everything at the same time, since he is infinite, omniscient, omnipotent, among other attributes.But then… It’s not easy…Thank you and I apologize for the length of these agnostic concerns…

--

Felipe

[Felipe Pérez Martí]

I responded this way: 

Dear Alejandro,It is clear that your position, although presented as based solely on scientific reason, also rests on an act of faith — one that is, by the way, so extraordinarily bold that it becomes implausible due to its sheer magnitude, as I will explain below.
We share something important in common: both of us accept rationality and verifiable empirical evidence. However, we arrive at different conclusions. This becomes evident when you say that, in the face of a “miracle” (in quotation marks), one should not consider it supernatural, but rather leave it as something “pending explanation” within the framework of scientific rationality.
To develop my point, I will quote the two statements you made:
On the one hand, you affirm:
“For now, for me, in a certain way from the perspective of the apostle Thomas, the narrative of the apocalyptic prophecies has an exclusively mythical character.”On the other hand, you say:
“I am aware of the so-called Eucharistic miracles… It is something inexplicable, outside the scope of the ‘natural’… For that very reason, I believe that within the framework of scientific rationality it should remain as something ‘pending explanation’… We should not assume a priori that it has a divine cause.”
Eucharistic Miracles and the Case of Carlo Acutis
If you watched the video I sent you (here: https://youtu.be/MHOPfWyF5z8?si=rs8X40r6Jjz_uly8), you will have realized that these are astonishing phenomena, incredible to reason. Using strictly rational language: they cannot be explained with any scientific knowledge currently available.
There are thousands of documented miracles throughout history, especially in the area of health (instant cures of cancer, regrowth of amputated limbs, people born blind who regain sight, etc.). But let us focus on a specific and recent case: the first miracle approved for the beatification of Carlo Acutis (2020).
In Campo Grande, Brazil, a boy named Matheus Vianna was born with annular pancreas (a rare congenital malformation). From the age of 2 or 3, he only received palliative treatment; there was no known cure. On October 12, 2013, during a Mass for Our Lady of Aparecida, Matheus (then about 6 or 7 years old) touched a relic of Carlo Acutis and, with a firm voice, asked “to stop vomiting.” From that very instant, the vomiting ceased, he was able to eat normally, and subsequent examinations showed that his pancreas was completely normal. The attending physicians unanimously declared that it was inexplicable from a scientific point of view. There was no medical intervention or any other treatment.
The Canonization Process and the Scientific Method
In canonization processes, the Church applies a rigorous contrast of hypotheses:

• Null hypothesis (status quo): “There was no miracle; everything has a natural explanation.”
• Alternative hypothesis: There is no available natural explanation.

The burden of proof falls on those proposing the miracle. They must demonstrate that the healing was rapid, complete, permanent, and without any possible scientific explanation. Detailed testimonies from doctors, X-rays, ultrasounds, and analyses from childhood are collected. In Matheus’s case, the medical opinion was unanimous: no known method could explain it.
The family did not resort to shamans or sorcerers. I have heard, through the testimony of very experienced exorcists (such as the Spanish priest Fr. Javier Luzón), that healings through sorcery do exist, but they are partial, take time, create dependency, and require ever-increasing payments (in extreme cases, even leading the person to sell their soul to the devil). In contrast, healings of divine origin are immediate and total, and their fruits are good, lasting, and liberating.
Applying Falsificationism to Your Position
Returning to what you say about Eucharistic miracles (“inexplicable… pending explanation”), let us analyze it using the falsificationism you yourself demand.The initial null hypothesis was: “There is no miracle.” The presented evidence falsifies that hypothesis with a high degree of confidence. The new null hypothesis becomes: “This event has no known natural explanation.”
Whoever now claims “it does have a natural explanation, but we just haven’t discovered it yet” is proposing — from a scientific point of view — a new alternative hypothesis, even if they are not aware of it. That hypothesis also carries the burden of proof: it must present evidence or a plausible mechanism. As long as it does not, maintaining it can also be considered dogmatic.
The Question of Faith and Plausibility
Can one say to a scientist that “it is taken for granted a priori that it has a divine cause”? Yes, that implies an act of faith.But the inverse question is key:
Can one take it for granted a priori that it has a natural cause, even if we do not know it?
The answer is also: no. That is also an act of faith (faith in naturalism).
Conclusion: If both of us accept rationality and empirical evidence, one cannot accuse Catholics of being dogmatic for accepting the supernatural when the evidence has falsified the natural explanation. Dogmatically maintaining that “someday science will explain it” without proof is also a position of faith.
I go further: the faith required to believe that everything has a pending natural explanation is, objectively, much stronger and more demanding than the Catholic faith in divine intervention.

1. In Eucharistic miracles (the case in the video):
   Phenomena separated by more than 1,300 years, always with type AB blood (rare, only 4-5% of the population), living heart tissue with active hematopoiesis years later… Who applied the same “secret formula” for 13 centuries without leaving a trace? That would require a conspiracy or non-existent technology. The naturalistic faith here is enormous.
2. In the case of Carlo Acutis and similar ones (such as those at Lourdes):
   Inevitable questions for the naturalistic explanation:
   When will there be a remedy that instantly cures a congenital pancreatic malformation or lengthens a bone in seconds?
   Who applied that invisible remedy?
   What would a “formula” consist of that only works when a family prays with faith?
   No one has any clue about such a mechanism. Postulating that “it exists but we don’t know it yet” is a much bolder act of faith.

That is why, for me, it is a “Closed case” (I rest my case). The empirical evidence has falsified the null hypothesis. Whoever wishes to maintain it now bears the full burden of scientific proof. If they maintain it without proof, their position is based on faith, not on scientific knowledge.
On your attitude, similar to that of the apostle Thomas
I fully understand that “seeing is believing” stance. Thomas demanded concrete empirical evidence and, upon confronting it, he believed. An ultra-naturalist would say about the Resurrection the same thing he says about these miracles: “There really was no miracle, there was no resurrection. There is a scientific explanation, but we just haven’t found it yet.” It is the same naturalistic faith. Incidentally, for that case I also produced a scientific reasoning based on verifiable empirical evidence and a hypothesis grounded in economic theory (signaling games: the change in the apostles’ attitude cannot be reproduced by someone who does not have enough courage to sacrifice their life; these are “separating equilibria” — link).
Finally, about the propheciesI recommend reading the book Revelations of Marie-Julie Jahenny (a French mystic of the 19th century), which I cited in my article God’s Plan for the Apocalyptic Times.
https://www.quehacer.wiki/wiki/God%27s_Plan_for_Apocalyptic_TimesShe accurately predicted many events that have already been fulfilled, such as the two World Wars. Regarding the third, she spoke of a great conflict that would involve “Persia” (the historical name for Iran) and Israel, among other surprisingly current details. She said this 150 years ago.

--

Felipe