Re: [talk-au] cities changed to towns

8 views
Skip to first unread message

John Smith

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 3:56:48 AM12/11/12
to Alex Sims, tal...@openstreetmap.org, share...@googlegroups.com
On 11 December 2012 19:31, Alex Sims <al...@softgrow.com> wrote:
> On 11/12/2012 6:06 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>>
>> Ok, but I don't think we should get hung up on the coincidence between the
>> Australian official meaning of "city" and the tag "place=city". (By
>> coincidence, I mean, if we happened to speak some other language, obviously
>> there'd be no official designation of "city".)
>>
>> So...what do we want place=city to refer to?
>
> I would want "place=city" to refer to an urban populated area of at least
> 100,000 people as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Values

As pointed out by others, the term city is fairly subjective, this
discussion comes up about once a year.

> I've taken to fixing errors from Geofabrik OSMI and have changed places to
> match the schema above. Whilst I find hamlet & village grate on me as words,

Hamlet and village are terms used in Australia if you go looking, as
is suburb even when the area is mostly empty.

Liz

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 5:47:13 AM12/11/12
to share...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:56:48 +1100
John Smith <deltafo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> So...what do we want place=city to refer to?
> >
> > I would want "place=city" to refer to an urban populated area of at
> > least 100,000 people as per
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Values
>
> As pointed out by others, the term city is fairly subjective, this
> discussion comes up about once a year.
>
> > I've taken to fixing errors from Geofabrik OSMI and have changed
> > places to match the schema above. Whilst I find hamlet & village
> > grate on me as words,
>
> Hamlet and village are terms used in Australia if you go looking, as
> is suburb even when the area is mostly empty.

sounds metrocentric to me
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages