sfshop.net dead?

19 views
Skip to first unread message

apm

unread,
Jan 12, 2011, 3:16:09 PM1/12/11
to sfs...@googlegroups.com
svn.sfshop.net doesnt work for me, and mail to d...@sfshop.net just
returned " The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. "

Alexandru-Emil Lupu

unread,
Jan 13, 2011, 3:09:04 AM1/13/11
to sfs...@googlegroups.com
The project is not dead.
you could use con...@sfshop.net
and for the moment please use googlecode repository.
Alecs

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:16 PM, apm <korj...@gmail.com> wrote:
svn.sfshop.net doesnt work for me, and mail to d...@sfshop.net just returned " The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. "

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sfshop" group.
To post to this group, send email to sfs...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sfshop+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sfshop?hl=en.




--
Have a nice day!

Alecs
Certified ScrumMaster

P.S. If you are on a list, please don't contact me privately, unless i have allowed to. Further messages will be ignored.

There are no cannibals alive! I have ate the last one yesterday ... 
I am on web:  http://www.alecslupu.ro/
I am on twitter: http://twitter.com/alecslupu
I am on linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alecslupu
Tel: (+4)0722 621 280

Sébastien HEITZMANN

unread,
Feb 9, 2011, 1:11:28 AM2/9/11
to sfs...@googlegroups.com
Hi everybody.

We just migrate a production e-commerce website to a widely modified
sfshop version.

http://www.equipmoto.fr

It's about 5000 visit/day 5000 product online.

The experiance of using sfshop was very hard. We have rewrited a lot of
code from the basic version.
The big number of plugin depending each other is not very practical.
When we need to do a modification we have to search in a lot of place to
find the "real" file. So I think that a lot of plugins have to be merged.

The javascript process of command is complex with a lot of javascript
interaction with a lot of files. I don't understand why it's so complex.
I think that this part should be rewriten too.

So, to conclude, I think that it was a mistake to use shshop for this
project. But yet we have a good experience on sfshop and we know what
too keep and what to rewrite.

We think about a fork of sfshop or maybe to rewrite some part keeping
the sfshop name.

SfShop is a good start for the moment but not really ready to be used
for a new shop.

My 2 cents.

S�bastien HEITZMANN
www.2le.net

Alexandru-Emil Lupu

unread,
Feb 9, 2011, 3:13:01 AM2/9/11
to sfs...@googlegroups.com
Hello!
I have under private development a doctrine version that it uses less
plugins, mainly grouped as follows:
- Catalogue = allows you to create a simple catalogue website, without
any basket and other stuff
- Extended = Allows you to add newsletters and users capabilities and
some other stuff
- Complete = (Requires all other 2 plugins ) and adds basket, order,
wishlist and 2 base plugins (delivery and payment)

The specific payment and delivey are kept as separate plugins for a
better granularity.

If you would like, i could put the current code on a repo (better said
i could give you access to git ) ... and maybe you could help me to
release sooner a doctrine version. I am pretty open in brace the
change ...

in this moment it happens that the order, wishlist and some other
functionality is not implemented, so ... help would be required.

A

> Sébastien HEITZMANN
> www.2le.net

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages