Tecoar 1493-5 juutalaisten verikekkerit ja Jeesus

[TJT2]

Ihmisten verestä tehtyä jauhetta kaupittelivat, kirja sensuroitiin, Raamattu
jne mainitaan, olisi mukavaa jos muutkin kuin P de G ottaisivat kantaa...
x x x clip x x x
By mentioning the "Christian blood in their rituals" (p. 522) as an
example of alleged "anti-Semite" prejudice, in their opinion shared by
Graf, the "plagiarist bloggers" display another proof of their coarse
ignorance.

In early 2007 the book by Ariel Toaff with the title Pasque di
sangue (Bloody Easters) was published in Italy. Ariel is the son of the
former head rabbi of Rome Elio Toaff and lecturer of Medieval History
in Israel. In his review, Sergio Luzzatto, a Jewish lecturer of Modern
History at the University of Torino, wrote:3215

(Snip italia)

"A splendid history book, this is a study too serious and praiseworthy to
clamor its qualities like in a bazaar stall. However it must be said that
Pasque di sangue (Bloody Easters) proposes an original thesis and that is -
somehow - even upsetting. Toaff states that from 1100 to about 1500, in the
period between the first crusade and the dusk of the Middle Ages, some - or
perhaps many - crucifixions of Christian 'putti' [cherubic infants] did
occur
and as a result this led to reprisals against entire Jewish communities,
against their innocent men, women and children, as occurred in Trento in
1475 and elsewhere in late medieval Europe. In the geographical
Germanspeaking
area between the Rhine, the Danube and the Adige rivers, a minority
of fundamentalist Ashkenazi did perpetrated the crime of human sacrifices.

By revealing his extraordinary knowledge in the fields of history,
theology and anthropology, Toaff is able to illustrate the centrality of
blood
in the celebration of Jewish Easter: the blood of the lamb, which celebrates
the liberation from Egyptian slavery in Egypt, and as well as in the blood
of
the foreskin of the circumcised newborn male of Israel. And according to a
biblical passage, blood for the first time was spilled during the Exodus,
from the son of Moses, which some orthodox tradition liken to Icaac's
blood that Abraham was ready to sacrifice. Therefore in the ritual dinner of
Pesach, and before the ten curses of Egypt were recited, the unleavened
bread had to be kneaded with pulverized blood, while other dried blood
had to be dissolved in wine.

Hence, Toaff references some fanatical Jews
who surmised that the blood of a Christian child killed for the occasion
would be most apt. This is the blood of a new Agnus Dei to consume for a
greeting purpose, as well as to crash down the ruin of the persecutors, the
damned followers of a false and lying faith. This new blood was good to
vindicate the terrible desperate actions of infanticides and collective
suicides
which was repeatedly forced on the Jews of the German area because
of the obnoxious practice of forced baptisms imposed on them in the name
of Jesus Christ. Besides the sacrificial value, the pulverized blood (human
and of animal origin) had for the Jews various therapeutic functions, to the
point that they were induced, with the consent of the rabbis, to challenge
the biblical prohibition to ingest it in any way. According to the dictates
of
a practical centuries-old Kabbalah tradition, the blood helped to mitigate
epileptic fits, to stimulate the sexual desire, but principally it served as
a
potent haemostatic agent; it stopped menstruation; it blocked nasal
epistaxis;
and most importantly it immediately healed in the newborn the wound of
circumcision. It is for these reasons that in the fifteenth century a black
market on both sides of the Alps flourished. It saw a coming and going of
Jewish vendors of human blood: with their leather bags with the tin-plated
bottom, and with even the rabbinic certification of the product, kosher
blood."

A national pandemonium sparked off instantly in Italy, which later
spread internationally. The accusation against Toaff was that he was
supplying "ammunition to the anti-Semites of all kinds, including the
negationists of the Shoah [munizioni agli antisemiti di ogni genere,
inclusi i negazionisti della Shoah]," as Robert Bonfil, lecturer of Hebrew
History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, candidly declared,
3216 masking the actual reason with rather spurious historiographic
motives, since the rage was based on press releases and almost nobody
knew the real content of the book.

Soon enough Toaff was forced
to surrender. On 14 February 2007 he asked the book's publisher, Editore
il Mulino, to cancel the book's publication,3217 which was subsequently
withdrawn as "purged" by the author. A striking case of preventive
censorship and self-censorship which shows the immense power of
historiographic dogmas: Toaff submitted to them just like the authors of
the Third Reich are said to have done.
x x x clop x x x

--
--TJT--
Myers had myriads of opportunities to make a fool of himself, and he missed
not a single one of them.