You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to sFlow
Hello all,
I'm in the process of adding sFlow functionality to the Flow Analyzer project and have run into a snag - 8800,2 coming from Ubiquiti and VyOS devices. I've wrote parsers for almost every record format in Enterprise 0, and I see that 8800 is mentioned in code comments as coming from PMACCT, So far I see mentions of sFlow Extended Class and sFlow Extended Tag, but from there the documentation takes me in circles.
I've parsed the single UINT field in 8800,2 and gotten "4", but I can't find a structure that helps me parse what "4" means. Any help would be very much appreciated! Thanks.
Peter Phaal
unread,
Nov 22, 2016, 11:14:34 PM11/22/16
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to sFlow
Published structure numbers are listed on sFlow.org:
You will need to look at the PMACCT code or ask a question on the
PMACCT mailing list to get more information on their meaning.
Tyler Hart
unread,
Nov 24, 2016, 12:20:14 AM11/24/16
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to sFlow
Thanks for replying Peter. I've been digging through the pmacct code and their documentation, but again it's leading me in circles (or the docs are incomplete). I'm going to ping them on their mailing list and once I get an answer I'll document and reply here just in case anyone else is seeing the same. Thanks again!