Continuity between Paleoindian and post-Paleoindian period

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Peter N. Jones

unread,
Feb 1, 2011, 2:58:07 PM2/1/11
to sfaa-na...@googlegroups.com

In the most recent issue of American Antiquity (76(1):24-40), Douglas Bamforth has published an article (Original Stories, Archaeological Evidence, and Post-Clovis Paleoindian Bison Hunting on the Great Plains) in which he argues that the archaeological evidence on the Great Plains supports Native continuity between the Paleoindian period (pre-10,900 cal. BC) and the post-Paleoindian period (after 10,900). This is good news, as many of us remember that arguments have been put forth (Kennewick, etc.) that there was no continuity during this period, especially for the Plains, Great Basin, and Plateau. Although Bamforth’s article pertains only to the Great Plains, it is encouraging to see a reversal in how archaeology conceptualizes Native American ancestry into the deep past.

 

Cheers,

 

Peter

 

___________________________________

Peter N. Jones, Ph.D.

Director: Bauu Institute and Press

http://www.bauuinstitute.com

Editor: Indigenous Peoples Issues & Resources

http://indigenouspeoplesissues.com

 

 

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages