I think that the way to go with this issue is what's called "extended
producer responsibility." It is not a new idea in environmentalist
circles, and it basically means that if you (a company) make something,
you must accept it back and recycle it whenever people are done with it,
the "end of its life." Often the company pays/must pay to have it
shipped back to them as well.
Why this matters is that goods are often sold to a series of poorer
people as the item depreciates in value, until it is in the hands of
someone who is unable or unwilling to pay to recycle things, and dumps
it.
In the case of EVs, since EVs are themselves beneficial to society (as
an alternative to fossil fuel combustion) and as such should be
incentivized rather than disincentivized, we would not want to make it
more expensive for the company by requiring them to pay for the
recycling; so what I would suggest considering to advocate for is that
in WA state, the producer must accept and recycle the item (they're the
experts, after all) but the state reimburses them for the cost of doing
the recycling. So like, the EV maker would tally up how many EVs or EV
batteries from WA state they recycled, and at convenient intervals
(quarterly, yearly, or whatever is agreed between the companies and the
state) they get a check from the state. There could be a provision for
getting the dead batteries shipped from consumer to producer at no cost
to the consumer, as well.
Corey Ballantyne
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SEVA_list/1900277407.290539.1788417089489%40mail.yahoo.com
> [1].
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SEVA_list/1900277407.290539.1788417089489%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer