dedcoun faranda ivannyah

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Kizzy Burnworth

unread,
Aug 2, 2024, 8:52:25 AM8/2/24
to sergehipti

I got a Nook Color for Christmas, and my dd got a Kindle Fire. So we have been having fun comparing the two. They are very similar but there seems to be more free books and apps available for the Kindle than for the Nook. So I'm just wondering if it would be worth it to root it so I could download the Kindle app. I have never even owned a smartphone, so I'm not very technically savvy. ;)

My kids got Nook Colors for Christmas. We set them up to boot off of an SD Card (we did it ourselves). We had to troubleshoot a little bit, but got them to work. We didn't root them by overwriting the nook interface and if we take out the memory card they still boot up as a stock Nook Color.

My daughter can text her friends using Google voice and the kids have access to Android Market apps as well as the Amazon app store. They can check out library books over WiFi and use both the Nook and Kindle apps to read books. They also can watch Netflix, check email, update Goodreads and do math flashcards.

The OS that we used (CM7) can be a little unstable at times, but nothing that hasn't been fixed by restarting. I understand that rooting them is more stable and most of the issues are caused from booting from the sd card, but rooting voids the warranty and we wanted to see how it worked from the sd card first.

I rooted dw's Nook Color, so she could install the Kindle app and any other app from the Google Market. However, she missed the animation of the pages she had with the stock version, and made me switch it back. :glare:

we have 2 rooted nooks. i bought one SD card from rootmynook.com & the other one we purchase for about half the cost at amazon. both SD cards work great (the format is a little different, but they do the same thing). the benefit of rooting your nook is that it turns it into an android tablet. we can still read books on it, but we also can download apps from the amazon market or android market. we also have access to netflix and youtube. it's just fun. if i ever want to revert back to the nook color operating system, i simply can take out the SD card.

Our kids play Plants vs Zombies and Peggle on my rooted Nook. I check email on it. I also run the Kindle app on it :lol: DH tried it first with the android OS on the SD card but it ran too slow that way so he went all the way with it.

I rooted my new Nook tablet. Once you root and block the OTA's, you don't have access to the Nook store on your device anymore. I buy my books online and side load to my Nook. I have full access to Android Market, Kindle apps and reader, as well as the Kobo reader app, which I must say is WAY better than B&N content. I wanted it for the incredible fast processor and OS. I installed different launcher and debloated it as well.

The Kindle is a tablet. After comparing the two (NC and Fire) the main differences to *me* seem to be that there are more apps/books available on Amazon than on Barnes & Noble, and the NC has an SC card and the Fire doesn't. The Fire instead has extra "Cloud" storage which of course you must be online to access.

When I reviewed 2010's Barnes & Noble Nook Color, one of my biggest complaints was that it felt a little underpowered for a tablet. Sure, it was fine for reading e-books, running games like Angry Birds, and surfing the Web, but it just didn't run as smoothly as an iPad.

Despite that drawback, the Nook Color was arguably the best 7-inch tablet out there for the money, and a lot of folks who "rooted" the device to turn it into a fully open Android tablet seemed to agree with that assessment.

Fire extinguisher?
People are asking two questions about the Nook Tablet: Is it better than the Kindle Fire? And is it worth $50 more? They're tough questions to answer, if only because it depends on how much of an Amazon or Barnes & Noble person you are and whether you prefer a simple black slate to the more refined, stylized look of the Nook Tablet (some people don't like the little loop in the bottom left corner that covers the memory card slot, for instance, whereas others think it's a nice distinguishing factor).

Personally, I give the nod to the Nook Tablet in both the design and specs department. But I must say that I like the Fire's interface and, as an Amazon Prime member and frequent Amazon shopper, when I got my Fire review sample I was able to log into my Amazon account and jump right into the services integrated into that device, including the instant video streaming. (A Prime membership costs $79 per year.) I'd also previously downloaded a number of apps from Amazon's Appstore for Android, and they were sitting there waiting to be re-installed as soon as I turned the Fire on and logged into my Amazon account.

Like the Fire, the Nook Tablet is running a highly "skinned" version of Android, but the device on a whole feels a little more open. True, unless you "root" the Tablet, you're still dealing with Barnes & Noble's customized, walled-garden interface, but having the expansion memory slot (and more internal memory--16GB vs. the Fire's 8GB) to add and store content instead of moving it on and off the cloud, is appealing--at least to me. And though the Tablet measures slightly bigger than the Fire (they weigh about the same), the Nook Tablet does feel a little better in your hand, largely because the border around the screen has a textured finish whereas the Fire has a glossy, translucent plastic border.

Despite their design and interface differences, the two devices share a lot in common. They both are multimedia tablets that allow you to read e-books, magazines, and newspapers (as well as comics and children's books), watch movies, listen to music, surf the Web, run apps, and check your e-mail. And both do what they're advertised to do and do it well--in some cases, very well.

As I write this review, I have both the Nook Tablet and Kindle Fire sitting next to my keyboard alongside the original Nook Color (I also have an iPad 2 nearby), so hopefully you'll get a strong sense of how the Nook Tablet stands on its own as a product as well as how it fairs against its closest competitors.

Nook Tablet key specs:
In many respects, the Nook Tablet is very much the Nook Color 2.0. It's got the same chassis but weighs 14.1 ounces or 1.7 ounces less than the Nook Color, and the 7-inch screen is the same resolution as its predecessor. But--as you'd expect a year later--it gets the aforementioned faster CPU, more memory and storage, and an operating system upgrade.

The full skinny:
I'm not going to delve into every last detail about the device, but here are my thoughts on some key areas and how they relate to the Kindle Fire and, to a lesser degree, the iPad 2.

The screen: Though the Nook Tablet has the same 1,024x600-pixel resolution as the Nook Color (and the Kindle Fire), B&N has says the new processor and software tweaks have improved the screen-rendering performance so that everything looks a tad better.

I took a look at the Nook Color and Nook Tablet side by side, and while I didn't notice a huge difference, the letters on book covers appeared crisper and images slightly more defined. I also compared two identical screensavers on both screens and found the screensaver on the Nook Tablet looked slightly richer.

The Kindle Fire's screen is also good, and despite Barnes & Noble's claim that its screen is less reflective and shows slightly less glare, it is difficult to see a difference--though I did think the Nook Tablet's screen had slightly better black levels (I compared both at full brightness). Both screens are in-plane switching (IPS) displays with good off-axis viewing (Barnes & Noble says its screen offers an 89-percent viewing angle).

Performance: With a faster dual-core CPU and double the RAM of the Nook Color, the Nook Tablet is noticeably zippier than its ancestor (as I said, I always thought the Nook Color was a bit underpowered) and the overall experience operating the device was generally smooth, though the iPad 2 feels a bit more responsive.

The Kindle Fire runs the same 1GHz OMAP4430 processor as the Nook Tablet but the Tablet's inclusion of 1GB of RAM instead of the Fire's 512MB gives it a leg up in the multitasking department (running multiple apps at the same time).

Storage: This is a big one. Even before I laid a finger on the Kindle Fire, its 8GB, nonexpendable storage capacity gave me pause. Of that 8GB, only 6GB is user-accessible. By doubling to 16GB out of the gate--and offering the ability to add up to 32GB additional storage via microSD--the Nook Tablet makes me less anxious about storing all of the books, magazines, apps, music, and videos I want, without needing to worry about being within range of a Wi-Fi hot spot for real-time streaming from the cloud, as Amazon emphasizes for its product.

Books: With a library said to be at 2 million titles and counting, Barnes & Noble's catalog is at or near the top of the e-book seller heap. I still think Amazon provides a somewhat better on-device shopping experience, but the Nook has closed the gap since its earlier incarnation (with the Nook Tablet's release, Barnes & Noble has once again revamped the Nook Store and it's clearly improved). And Barnes & Noble's early foray into color means that it already has a good library of illustrated children's books built up (you can now record and add your voice--or you children's voice--to those books, thanks to an integrated microphone).

I'm not going to go too deeply into the reading experience except to say that it's very good. You can easily change fonts and set different backgrounds for night and day reading. You also can highlight words and passages (add notes); perform dictionary, Google, and Wikipedia look-ups by tapping on a word; and share quotes from books on Facebook and Twitter from within a book you're reading.

90f70e40cf
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages