Google DeepMind’s AlphaProof Nexus solves 9 Erdős problems and proves 44 sequence conjectures

25 views
Skip to first unread message

Bob Lyons

unread,
May 23, 2026, 10:46:06 AM (11 days ago) May 23
to seq...@googlegroups.com

The article mentions the OEIS.

Here's a link to the "Advancing Mathematics Research with AI-Driven Formal Proof Search" paper that the article references:


Bob

Antti Karttunen

unread,
May 23, 2026, 12:41:45 PM (11 days ago) May 23
to seq...@googlegroups.com
On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 5:46 PM Bob Lyons <bobly...@gmail.com> wrote:

It says that it proved 44/492 OEIS conjectures, but then later mentions only those involving
What were the others?

Best,

Antti
 


Here's a link to the "Advancing Mathematics Research with AI-Driven Formal Proof Search" paper that the article references:


Bob

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SeqFan" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to seqfan+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/seqfan/CAJ%3DEaLRfOTpF%2BX4xdxcL1LbdA2Ni8bD2qQFnZM%2BxBQU8aq%2Bwow%40mail.gmail.com.

D. S. McNeil

unread,
May 23, 2026, 1:01:45 PM (11 days ago) May 23
to seq...@googlegroups.com

brad klee

unread,
May 23, 2026, 3:51:07 PM (11 days ago) May 23
to seq...@googlegroups.com
The paper is here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.22763v1 . I don't know if the two mentioned 
are a pair of cherries or what, as neither of the sequences appeal to me. 

The conjecture for A108 is almost a poorly stated tautology, or more fairly a special 
case of a theorem that applies to all strong enough exponential growth. 

Harm.On.ica claims to have improved the proof working from a suggestion of mine: 

Unfortunately I think you're making each other look bad on that one, but hey, at 
least I also look bad using these methods and not checking that much. 

If I had more time we would go after A2897 as well. The theorem itself doesn't look 
very surprising, but the labor would be more involved. 

All the best, 



--Brad
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages