WoW 3.3.5a Custom MoP Files Bot
Fran Bottella
I'm a newbie to Docker, I have an application for which I am exploring Docker. With docker compose i can up multiple containers, till here everything is working as expected. We have respective .sh and .yml files.
Scenario which I'm having problem to understand is there is one container where I can place my custom directory, files and it's mentioned that at the time of container start/restart custom files will be copied to the webroot of that container. I would like to understand what happened behind the scene.
Depends on how you build and run the container. If you have a Dockerfile and in there you specify COPY or ADD /my/files/ /to/container/path this will result in copying /my/files inside the container and it will create a new image layer (each command you run inside the Dockerfile creates a new layer)
However, if you just use your docker-compose file and mount those files, the files will be shared between your host and the container. Which means you could edit files on your localhost and immediately sync'ed with the container or vice versa.
My main question is, I was using the Manage Custom Files button under Custom CSS to upload the video files that I reference in my code. (screenshot attached). Using this generated a url for me to reference for my code like this:
Find my contributions useful? Please like, upvote, mark my answer as the best ( solution ), and see my profile. Thanks for your support! I am a Squarespace ( and other technological things ) consultant open for new projects.
Sorry for reviving an old post, but I haven't been able to find a solution to the problem I'm experiencing with Managed Custom Files. Hope someone can help. When clicking on the drop-down arrow to expand Custom Files, it only lets me upload images and videos. I don't have any control over what I can do with the files, i.e., I don't see a Managed Custom Files option anywhere. I can't even scroll up or down Custom Files to select files or delete files. It only lets me upload files and that's it. Is this due to some recent Squarespace update? Or a less likely scenario but I'll ask anyway - is this because I'm on a Personal Plan subscription?
Thanks @creedon. If the UI has changed for v.7.1, would you be able to help steer me in the direction where or how I can manage and upload images/videos and create URLs to them, in the same way it is possible in Managed Custom Files?
Also, for the images that I uploaded to Custom Files but can't remove them, does that mean I can't do anything about them? I've only uploaded about 5 images before realizing I have no control over what I can do with them. It's not a big deal, but it bugs me that Custom Files is just there with no apparent functionality ?
Thanks @creedon . But as you can see from the screenshot in my original post, there's no option to hover over any file and click a big X to delete files. Could this be due to some sort of glitch somewhere in the Squarespace settings/UI or even browser settings?
Thanks @melody495. I initially thought it was a browser issue as well, so I checked and it's at 100% zoom. I even thought maybe it could be a browser extension (e.g., pop-up blocker) that's causing something to look off. But nothing changed after removing the extensions and closing and restarting the browser. I'll go through the custom codes to see if there's anything affecting Squarespace's editor, but not really sure what to look for ?
This begs the question of why the Custom Files doesn't work as it should in the Edge browser. Would be interesting to hear if anyone else has experienced this or other UI issues in Edge versus Chrome. Thanks @creedon and @melody495 for helping out!
This begs the question of why the Custom Files doesn't work as it should in the Edge browser. Would be interesting to hear if anyone else has experienced this or other UI issues in Edge versus Chrome.
I'm now wondering if it could be something like a cookie settings issue in Edge. Will play around with some browser settings to see if that fixes things. Otherwise, will develop the website in Chrome from now on....
So things may look great on Chrome but not so good in Safari, Edge, and etc. Sometimes getting an effect to look good across the different browsers can be painful or not practical. One may need to prioritize their efforts into the browsers that have the larger market.
If the site is new then there won't be analytics but after they start coming in one will want to see which browsers are visiting the site and adjust the development efforts accordingly. If one had trouble with Edge for example and didn't spend much time trying to fix and the analytics say a very low single digit percentage are using it one may just leave it be. If however one were seeing double digit percentages in the 20s or more then one might rethink and spend the effort to address the issues.
Thanks. I was happily (and not giving a thought regarding choice of browsers) developing and testing the site in Edge for months with no problems up until the Managed Files issue. I will submit a ticket to support and see what they say.
Thanks for the advice. It's something I overlooked and didn't give it a thought at all until the Managed Files issue came up. I have both Edge and Chrome on my computer at home but even when working on the site at home, I still used Edge simply because I was so used to working in that environment. Thankfully it looks like the site works well from a user perspective in both Edge and Chrome (so far). Will definitely keep an eye on the analytics over time after the site goes live?
If I configure this on one of the search head, will this configuration replicates to other search heads?
If Yes - Any document that can say that custom conf files replicates to other search heads.
If No - How should I configure App?
So yes, using a custom python command to modify configurations will not trigger a configuration update. If you're editing this way, it would be better to finalize the script with a hit against the rest config endpoint for the app....
When using my local machine, i can create a simple app that uses the tree interface tool with a custom file specified. This is great because whenever the custom file is changed (i.e. rows are added/deleted), the workflow will recognize those changes (i.e. when i run the app, it's going out and checking a fresh copy of that file before it shows the user the options); however, our private server cannot handle a custom file for the tree interface tool that points to a UNC file. I don't want to package the file with the app. I receive an error message when I run the app. Is there something else I can do to fix the error I'm receiving in the server environment? If it's not a current capability, it would be great if it could be added. Note that I also tried using an oracle connection, which again worked on my local machine, but errored out on the server. I've included my sample workflow and custom tree file. By changing the workflow dependencies to be UNC file path, you should be able to recreate the errors I'm getting (assuming that the error I'm getting is legitimate). Thanks!
b37509886e