I use a find command to find some kinds of files in bash. Everything goes fine unlness the result that is shown to me just contains the file name but not the (last modification) date of file. I tried to pipe it into ls or ls -ltr but it just does not show the filedate column in result, also I tried this:
I've got two DateTime fields, first field as start time and second field as end time. I've used decimal date calculation formula for elapsed time int((decimal-date-time($endtime) - decimal-date-time($starttime)) * 24*60) to give the answer in a separate viewable field.
There don't seem to be any specific pattern to which elapsed minutes result will return an incorrect result. For example, with start time 12:00pm, incorrect results were returned for 3, 8, 11 etc minutes elapsed but when start time was 12:01pm, different numbers of minutes elapsed returned incorrect results. Has anyone had an issue like this?
Additional question - I have a DateTime field set to display today() as default and 'Required'. However I would like to have the time section display as blank (it displays defaults of 12:00), to force all respondents to manually enter in the time (their time entries will never be now(), or able to be calculated) and minimise any possibility of accidentally not entering time data or respondents being lazy. Is this possible? I would rather retain the DateTime and not have a separate Time field.
The issue you're seeing is likely due to rounding (one minute in decimal time is 0.00069444444444). The int() function converts a decimal to a whole number by discarding the decimal places (it doesn't apply any rounding). Try replacing the int() function with round(), for example:
Regarding your second question, it's not possible to display the time as blank in a dateTime question if that question has a calculation or default. Without a calculation or default, both the date and time inputs will be empty until the user interacts with the question.
Thank you for your response re: the blank time field, very helpful to have this confirmed! Any idea if there are any workarounds to make separate Date and Time fields appear as compact as DateTime in the web form? I understand web form does not support theme-grid unfortunately, but anything to help condense the relatively large empty space taken up by having separate Date and Time fields would be amazing.
You will learn the subtleties of working with dates and times as the computer understands it. Coda does a great job of making it very easy to work with, although its hiding some complexity that you have now surfaced.
you have to return the date in string format, so yes @gvalero with toLocaleDateString () should also work.
(note that toLocaleFormat is deprecated
Deprecated and obsolete features - JavaScript MDN)
Welcome to the forum
I hope I assumed all formats and your request correctly. Can you use the String Manipulation (Variable) node between the widget and the filter and run this command in it?
join($$Sdate-input$$, "T00:00:00")
Hi @mlauber71, thanks a lot for the info you shared!
I sorted it out transforming my initial string to date&time than I changed it back to string in the format I need (dd.MM.yyyy), and I converted it again to date.
A1 when converted to general = 44160.64583A2 when converted to general = 44090.3125A3 when converted to general = 70.33333333So the date/time to number conversion looks rightand the math looks rightThe issue is with the conversion of number to Date/Time in A3.
If you want a different output format, that is doable. But I would stick with output as *text, because certain differences cannot be expressed with the date format; for example 01-02-29 (1 yr, 2 months, 29 days) since there were not 29 days in February that year).
It is hard to see your purpose in the final format so guesses aren't too likely to be correct. Nonetheless, I'll make my best guess and think your purpose is to show the difference in time as a portion of the current year, as a date in the year to give a feel of a different sort than a percentage of the year would do. So I am guessing your desired outcome in the example would be "20/03/10 08:00:00"...
You could accomplish that by adding 43830 to the subtraction in A3. So the elapsed time would be relative to the start of the year. You could future-proof that by using DATEVALUE() and passing it a constructed string that finds the current year and joins "1/1/" to it.
Since you are using Date Timestamp (Date & Time together) then you have to work with different methods. You can't us the DATEVALUE function because it converts a date represented as text into a proper Excel date.
CPA Exam scores are released on a rolling basis throughout the year. The score release dates below show when you can expect to receive your score after sitting for a section. This helps you to better plan your testing schedule.
The AICPA typically announces the score release dates for the first half of a new year in December of the previous year and the second half by June of that year. Keep in mind, the target score release date represents when the AICPA will send the scores to NASBA.
We are in Adelaide, Australia and our State switched to daylight savings time last week on the 6th of October at 2:00 AM local time. We will switch back to normal Australian Adelaide Time on the 4th of April next year at 3:00 am.
The problem I have is the weird (for us anyway) behaviour of the gmt() function when the date passed is 10 and a half hours before the time of the daylight savings switch. It subtracts an hour to the result.
I suggest you open a support case with Appian to address this behavior, as it seems like it's probably a bug. Be sure to include your test code (preferably in an expression that can just be executed in the expression rule editor after copy&paste), as well as your specific time zone ID so that they don't have to do too much guesswork to reproduce your issue.
But the Appian Process assumes that these dates are UTC so in the process model, the values at the start of the process are automatically converted by Appian into local time equivalent. One of the first nodes I have in the process is to convert the dates via an expression so something like gmt(ri!startDateTime) and gmt(ri!endDateTime). The startDateTime would be correct but the finishDateTime is off by an hour.
One of the ugly work-arounds we can think of for the above scenario is to force the external parties to pass a UTC datetime, though this is Web API specific.
The other thing I'm thinking that will apply to other parts of our application is to create a reusable expression that calls the gmt() function but then adds or subtracts an hour offset if the datetimes fall within the affected ranges.
Hi, besides any other issues with timezones, timestamps transported via any interface from/to an external system must be UTC. Then there is a clear state you can work on. This is what I try to enforce in all our projects.
Watch our video series, Inside the CFA Program, for candid, accessible answers to common questions we hear from our candidates, from how we set the bar, to what goes into the grading process and more.
After all testing is completed and the exam window closes, CFA Institute begins conducting a thorough analysis of exam questions/candidate performance to identify the minimum passing score (MPS) that represents basic competence in the subject matter. For Level III grading, hundreds of CFA charterholders will participate in an essay grading event. The Board of Governors will then convene to approve the MPS. Rigorous quality control processes and data quality review steps are completed to ensure results are presented accurately to all tested candidates. Candidates will receive periodic messages to keep them updated on the progress of exam results, and additional information will be published to this page as it becomes available.
Detailed exam scores and responses to exam questions are measurement information and part of a candidate's test record, both of which are owned solely by CFA Institute. This information is not given to candidates.
After each exam administration, the CFA Institute Board of Governors sets the minimum passing score (MPS) for each level. The purpose for this approach is to ensure fairness to candidates across administrations as the difficulty of each test is taken into account when setting the MPS. CFA Institute does not release the MPS or individual candidate scores.
Scores are delivered over a window of time after the test date and are processed continuously during business hours. ACT is committed to providing your scores as quickly as possible but cannot guarantee a specific date for your scores to be reported.
Outside of state testing and district testing, you may request to cancel scores for a particular test date. Contact us online and we will provide you a form to complete and return to us. We will then permanently cancel that score record for the indicated test date and send cancellation notices to any score recipients.
You determine which set of scores is sent to colleges or scholarship programs. We will release only the scores from the test date (month and year) and test location (e.g., National, State, School) you designate.
When dates are represented with numbers they can be interpreted in different ways. For example, 01/05/22 could mean January 5, 2022, or May 1, 2022. On an individual level this uncertainty can be very frustrating, in a business context it can be very expensive. Organizing meetings and deliveries, writing contracts and buying airplane tickets can be very difficult when the date is unclear.
f5d0e4f075