Hi Miguel,
Thanks for opening the debate here. Yes, it would be fun to open our appetite for this discussion here in the Forums.
Here's what we have on Ethos, in the context of Sensorica.
This is Mayssam's territory and I defer to him to guide us, he spent years researching the topic.
It rings true to me that knowing ourselves and having the ability to be empathic are at the core of ethics.
I recently started a book on libertarianism, an ethical system that is so simple and elegant (coherent) that one cannot pass near it without being fascinated. At the same time, it is not without problems, which must be related to its simplicity.
[[[The world is a complex thing and no matter how you try to formalize it you'll always end up with a gross oversimification that runs into problems sooner or later. But it turns out that society is better when we make things clear, when we formalize things, when we define things and relations between them. So we need to compromise... make a choice of a formal system knowing that we'll be missing the fine grain of reality, but at least we gain in stability and efficacy overall. We just need to keep in mind that any system has alternatives, which might turn out to be better or worse, depending on circumstances. That's why we have more than one religion on this planet, more than one culture, etc. ]]]
So libertarianism stems from one basic principle: never initiate violence on someone else. From there, all sorts of norms are deduced and induced.
One of my personal interests is to uncover the roots and underpinnings of openness in the sense of permissionless or access to participation. That's a core principle of p2p, open source, etc. I link it to economic freedom. Kurt once said: no one should deny you to create value. With his permission, I used that in my TEDx video and it became the hallmark of Sensoica.
So no one should be denied access to create something good or positive is a fundamental principle for us. Building the ethics of Sensorica is about identifying actions that respect or go against this principle, actions that are acceptable or not, when measured against this principle. From this principle other things can be induced and deduced. For example transparency is a corollary of this principle: if someone denies me access to information that I may use to create something good he essentially denies me access to do that something good. Then we can make the same jump like libertarians make between ethics and economics, using concepts such as property for example, to which we add the notion of commons and nondominium. And go into governance and organisational design...
That's what goes in my head.