" A metal concert is a celebration by people with problems."
I truly agree with this statement that people who play heavy metal or
listen to it use it as a form of getting out their own anger or
agression.
This was one of the stranger readings that we’ve had. Perhaps I’ve just never thought about black metal music or logos connoting the nazi regime, but I have now. In general, I thought van der Velden had some interesting conclusions. I do think there is a tangible relationship between metal music and personal expression, much more so than other genre’s of music. While I don’t know anything about van der Velden, his quotes by Roelstraete were very interesting and provided a much more in-depth examination of the relationship between metal and the individual. One interesting idea that can be accredited to van der Velden was the idea that “The artist who introduces black metal aesthetics thus refers to a phenomenon that is considered to be taking place beyond the consciousness of the viewer” (van der Velden, 2). This seems to be one of the most interesting concepts he mentions. I think that this effect is what is driving alot of the recent cultural changes. The individual desires to see something they haven’t seen, as well as something with personality. People would like to be introduced to an idea/concept/genre, but not drowned in it. As a result, personal expression becomes more potent as a conceptual foundation. Which I believe directly relates to the appeal of black metal as a vehicle of self-empowerment and personal euphoria.
While I had never paid attention to metal band logos before, i did a quick google search of the bands he mentions throughout this article. While I don’t particularly find them appealing, perhaps that is just the effects of social/cultural conditioning that I have endured for 22 years now. Rather than a password, I think the logos act more like a gate, or as “a boundary” as he states. Regarding the use of the Fraktur font and it’s many usages in culture, the choice of font is only a small part of the decision process when branding something. Arguably more important than the typeface is the way the typeface is presented, black on white, white on black, upside down, big, small, etc. Depending on your predilections, you might find the logo expressing your inner emotions of revolt and personal empowerment. Or, as I do, you might find them interesting to look at, but not something you’d study. The jaggedness aesthetics seems to fit the function of a barbed wire gate more aptly. And as a result, I think the bands achieve the effects they want- an aesthetic protest and conscious statement of “no” to those who view it. All serving to the effect of telling “the connoisseur “this is a cult album that is worth your time”.
In the process of building my Personal Mythology, i’ve come across issues similar to the black metal logo quandary. How do I present a raw emotion/idea with a verbal language that is familiar yet placed in such a way that it would seem unfamiliar. Rather than depicting an idea, how could one embody it. I think in this way, the logos of the black metal genre succeed as visual connotations of their tone. Their logos embody their emotional expressions while using a common visual vocabulary. The relationship between Black Metal logos and CAPTCHA's serve the most accurate analogy for what is necessary to get to the emotional connotational core of the simplest idea.
Above all else, van der Veldan's piece is a great lecture on branding, and the importance of establishing a concept - then representing this idea visually, in the most clear and deliberate way possible. Crypto Logo directly relates to what we're doing in this class because it discusses how to relate/tell a story and emit it's mood and emotion. In this instance, the brand is actually a genre - black metal, one of the more successful examples and certainly one I wouldn't initially think of.
However after concluding my reading of Crypto Logo, I realized every aspect of a successful brand is important, but it certainly starts with the logo, the first thing someone typically sees.
"A logo plays a huge part in the image of a company or product. This is also certainly the case with bands… In back metal particularly, there is a certain revered aesthetic, like spikiness, illegibility, intricacy; to those things are added and intangible element that tells the connoisseur 'this is a cult album that is worth your time'."
I'd have to question though, whether black metal is actually so successful simply because of the band's name and their song titles which easily give the mood and concept away; such as the song titled "War" and band named "Mayhem", "Darkthrone", and "Venom". You know this isn't going to be Barry White singing sweetly about love (not sure why Barry White was the first thing that popped in my head, but I went with it). I'm also wondering if someone could hear the sound of this devilish music if it's logo wasn't illegible, angular, stark and dark, or contained inverted crosses, or spiders, or skulls, as many of them do. This led me to another discussion van der Veldan arrises that I found interesting, and that is the use of the typeface Fraktur.
I never really considered the diverse use of the typeface, and how intriguing that really is. It's peculiar how the same type can be used for an anti-Semitic magazine and is widely associated with the Nazi's, but is also highly used (and more importantly accepted!) in The New York Times and Le Monde… not to mention wedding invitations and diplomas. I'm curious what makes something a chameleon? I suppose it is due partly for the typeface's deeper meaning, the core of its essence… sounds as if we're speaking of a person with a soul; but as Mike said Fraktur's "voice is one of power and grander". This point also links back to our project, to evoke the deeper meaning of our stories, and get to the core of it's essence. (quite the tall order, Ali!)
All that being said though, while the logos of black metal are considered successful due to the fact that they relate the tune of the genre and subject matter it speaks of visually, they're also quite contrived, typical, and "uninventive". After googling some of the logos I didn't previously know, so many are so similar. I feel like the designer says "okay I can only use black white and red" and if all else fails let me throw on a few flames and slap on an inverted cross even if it's not integrated at all. Although I guess their not concerned with winning any great design credibility.. it is black metal after all.