On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Noah <
nre...@pratt.edu> wrote:
> “Then a shrieking voice joins in. It sounds like a Muppet being
> strangled,” (1) this somewhat dated pop-culture reference pulled me
> into the piece right off the bat. I immediately began to ponder what
> kind of person could mix such a relatively light reference with such a
> bluntly crude title. As I read on, I found myself intrigued with the
> overall concept of the password of metal being something as
> rudimentary as a logo, and yet it was the epicenter of what metal was
> protected by. Upon reaching Simulacrum, I was at first confused as to
> how Captcha could relate to metal logos in any way, other than being
> damn hard to read. Not only did it soon become clear to me how the two
> were related, but I was pulled into yet another realm of curiosity
> when “the age of individualization” was brought into the picture.
> Immediately thoughts flew through my head, consisting of my
> conflicting opinions of who our generation really is, whether we are
> moving towards being individual, or, in a much less appearent way,
> moving back towards conforment.
>
> As I pulled my thoughts back to the overall concept of a logo as a
> password, I recalled an idea van der Velden brought up that began to
> shed some light on the question of why. He presents this core idea
> through a series of descriptions of who these metal band members
> percieved themselves to be. By relying on perception, there needs to
> be an element of mystery as well, to support the people should
> perception begin to fall through. This mystery that came with the logo
> was that support. As metal became more widespread, bands moved away
> from the illegible and instead conformed in a sense to black letter, a
> completely clear and accessible font that had connotations these bands
> were interested in affiliating themselves with. It seemed odd to me
> that they would go from complete secrecy to such a bold statement, but
> they found a way to use pre-existing stereotypes to make their message
> concise in a quick fashion, while giving themselves a name that
> unaffiliated them with the Nazis, and yet they made it clear that they
> wanted to be affiliated with “evil”. Though perplexing to those whose
> brains don’t work in the same realm that theirs did, this technique
> was brilliant, as it created a space for people who identified with
> the metal scene, and the connotations that came with it. van der
> Velden concludes this piece with a quick historical time lapse of
> society’s perception of what is affiliated with metal. The way that
> van der Velden concludes was brilliant. Though this writing was
> incredibly clear for the most part, van der Velden uses his last few
> sentences to tie all the loose ends together, making it difficult to
> doubt many of his points by the end.
>
> Throughout my life, I have attempted to represent myself in the best
> light possible, but over time it has become clear to me that often I
> am not percieved in that way. When there is a situation in which I get
> angry, it doesn’t come out of nowhere. Though in many instances it is
> difficult for other people to fully comprehend why I react the way
> that I do, it stems from a place in my head where every possible
> outcome has been calculated and considered. When I get angry, and
> others have no clue where I am coming from, it is difficult to back
> track and calmly explain how and why I got to the thought process that
> I did, so instead I yell, which more often then not scares people away
> as opposed to gaining their help and respect. I could further attempt
> at explaining the concept of my brain, but this element of my anger is
> one that I am beginning to completely grasp and deconstruct. The
> element of mystery that lies within my brain can be most easily summed
> up with a final quote from van der Velden’s piece, “Just like a good
> restaurant in Rome is not to be found, the logo of an unknown black
> metal band is illegible; it is a symmetrical maze of jagged
> forms.” (1)
>
>
>