This will make it easier to know where other people are in their
reading and, consequently, what we can expect others to be familiar
with as well as what we really need to explain carefully if we are
reading ahead.
The same general structure applies to bringing in relavent works from
outside -- for instance, Saussure, C.S. Pierce, Giambattista Vico --
that have a bearing on Semiotics. Bringing these things into the
discussion is always good as long as we go to the trouble of
explaining their thoughts carefully and do not make the assumption
that everyone is familiar with what we are familiar with.
We will delay the schedule for one week to give those interested time
to purchase their copies of 'A Theory of Semiotics' and have it
delivered. We will complete the book by July 4th.
As a primer, here is the wikipedia article on Semiotics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics
And here is a list of relevant articles from the Stanford Encyclopedia
of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/search/searcher.py?query=semiotics
Somewhat arbitrarily, here is an article that might point to why
semiotics has a bearing on technology:
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/why-cant-pcs-work-more-like-iphones/?src=twt&twt=nytimesbits
THE SCHEDULE:
03/21 - 03/27: Purchase books
03/28 - 04/10: Read the Introduction 04/03 - 04/17: Discuss the
Introduction
04/11 - 04/24: Read Signification and Communication 04/18 - 05/1
Discuss Intro, chapt. 1
04/25 - 05/08: Chpt: 2.1 - 2.10
05/09 - 05/22: Chpt. 2.11 - 2.15
05/23 - 06/05: Chpt: 3.1 - 3.5
06/06 - 06/19: Chpt: 3.6 A typology of the modes of production
06/20 - 07/03: Chpt: 3.7 - 4.0
FIN