SemEval2012_LexicalSimplification

Hi Lucia, in your task description the name of our system as well as its description are right

Thank you Sujay for the information! Regards, Cyril. On 15 avr, 15:30, Sujay Jauhar <suja...@gmail

Sorry for the spam, I don't have the emails of all participants.

Dear Lucia, here a more detailed description of our system SB:mmsystem best, marilisa %% latex start

Dear all, we had mistakenly left a system out of the analysis, please find the updated results

Hi Cyril, >- is the workshop attendance mandatory if we send a paper for the workshop proceedings

Dear all, Please see below attached the statistical significance tests between all pairs of systems (

Hi all, Further to the email below, I would like to inform you that 2 participants submitted systems

Dear all, We were told that some participants have not received the submission confirmation from the

Hi all, Just to remind you that you have to register for SemEval by today in order to take part in

Dear all, SemEval has set an ftp server for all task submissions, please follow the instructions

Hi Sigrid (and everyone on the mailing list), The problem you mention is inherent in the original

Hi all, We've uploaded a new version of the scorer script on the task's website, please

Dear Ravi, We had corrected these and other spelling issues in the 'official' gold-standard

Hi all, As correctly pointed out by Sowmya (thanks!) there were a few spelling mistakes in some of

Hi Lucia Thanks for the baseline files. There seem to be some spelling mistakes in both the gold

Dear Andrew, There is no training data for this task, it follows the same structure of the previous (

Dear Himanshu, Well spotted. After experimenting with a few evaluation strategies, we found that the

Hi all, Thanks for the interest in the task. Just a small correction in the readme file we made