Fwd: [SemEval] Task 12: formal check of papers

[Deniz Yuret]

Dear all,

We have briefly checked the papers for formatting, title etc. and
found the following problems. Please consider these in your final
version:

5, 23: titles are not in correct format.
5, 24, 29, 49, 79: does not identify task number (#12)
5, 23, 24, 29, 49, 79: does not have reference to the task description paper

thanks,
deniz


> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Katrin Erk <katri...@mail.utexas.edu>
> Date: Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:55 AM
> Subject: [SemEval] Task 12: formal check of papers
> To: Deniz Yuret <deniz...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Carlo Strapparava <str...@fbk.eu>
>
>
> Dear organizers of task 12,
>
> please take one quick look at the papers for your task, attached to
> this mail. If there are any problems with papers for your task, we'd
> need to know about it by May 5.
>
> We would like you to check the following things:
>
> * Do the papers identify the task number correctly, and give their
> system name that you also use in the overview paper?
>
> * Do they present the system performance in a way that coincides with
> the measures and the scoring system that you gave them?
>
> * Is the paper compliant with the instructions you gave to participants, if any?
>
> * Is there anything else missing that needs to be included in the
> camera-ready version, such as full reference of the task description
> paper?
>
> Please _only_ notify us of any papers that have a problem. If a paper
> is fine, you don't need to let us know.
>
> It is possible that you have already reviewed some of the papers we
> are now sending you. So if you have already checked a paper for the
> problems  we list above, you don't need to re-check them.
>
> We are sending the papers to all organizers for your task of which we
> have the email address. That doesn't mean that you would all have to
> look at the papers individually. It is completely sufficient if one of
> you takes a quick look to make sure everything is alright. And as we
> said above, all we are asking you to do is to take a quick look (5
> minutes' worth of looking) to check that the paper is formally okay.
> We are not looking for another general review.
>
> Many thanks, and all the best,
> Katrin and Carlo
>
> --
> Katrin Erk, Department of Linguistics
> The University of Texas at Austin
> http://comp.ling.utexas.edu/people/katrin_erk
>

[Laura Rimell]

Hi Deniz,

Are these the confirmation numbers from when we submitted the papers? And
can you please provide the reference for the task description paper?

Thanks,

Laura

--
Laura Rimell
Research Assistant
University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory

[Deniz Yuret]

Hi Laura,

The reference for the task paper is:

@inproceedings{yuret2010semeval,
author={Deniz Yuret and Ayd{\i}n Han and Zehra Turgut},
title={SemEval-2010 Task 12: Parser Evaluation using Textual Entailments},
booktitle={Proceedings of the SemEval-2010 Evaluation Exercises on
Semantic Evaluation},
year={2010}
}

The numbers were the ones that were sent to us by the organizers
(Katrin and Carlo). I think they should be the same as confirmation
numbers you mention but I am not sure. If you just check the points
in Katrin's email for your paper and follow the instructions online
about the title etc. that should be sufficient.

best,
deniz