format of results if using 2010 formatted data

[Ted Pedersen]

Greetings all,

If we are using the 2010 formatted version of the input data, how
should the results be formatted? In particular I am wondering if we
need to use the same numbering as shown for the 2013 format of the
data or could we use something more like the 2010 answer format, which
had a lexelt, instance id, and then cluster identifier, as in....

aetna.n aetna.1.n C10

Thanks!
Ted

[Ted Pedersen]

Hmmm... I guess I meant

aetna.n aetna.n.1 C10
aetna.n aetna.n.2 C10
etc...

[Ted Pedersen]

I think I may have answered my question via a second look at the
evaluator program. There an output format is described that looks like
this...

liquid_air.n liquid_air.n.71 liquid_air.n.1

So I think rather than my C10 if I format like

aetna.n aetna.n.1 aetna.n.1

(where the 2nd field is the instance id and the 3rd is the cluster id)
then everything should be ok?

Thanks!
Ted

[Daniele Vannella]

Hi Ted,

Yes, it's correct.

Best
Daniele

> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:15:48 -0500
> Subject: Re: format of results if using 2010 formatted data
> From: tped...@d.umn.edu
> To: semeval-2013-ws...@googlegroups.com

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Semeval-2013 Task 11: WSI & Disambiguation within An Application" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to semeval-2013-wsi-in-a...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>