Create Master Key Sql Server

[Giraldo Allain]

Distributedjobs that have steps which are associated with a proxy run under the context of the proxy account on the target server. Make sure that the following conditions are met or job steps that are associated with a proxy will not be downloaded from the master server to the target:

If job steps that use proxy accounts fail when downloading them from the master server to the target server, you can check the error_message column in the sysdownloadlist table in the msdb database for the following error messages:

Right-click SQL Server Agent, point to Multi Server Administration, and then click Make this a Master. The Master Server Wizard guides you through the process of making a master server and adding target servers.

From the Master Server Operator page, configure an operator for the master server To send notifications to operators by using e-mail or pagers, SQL Server Agent must be configured to send e-mail. To send notifications to operators by using net send, the Messenger service must be running on the server where SQL Server Agent resides.

Copy and paste the following example into the query window and click Execute. This example enlists the current server into the AdventureWorks1 master server. The location for the current server is Building 21, Room 309, Rack 5.

As the error suggests, the SQL login has no permission to create database. Permissions are granted when the login have the required roles. The role having permission to create, alter and drop database is dbCreator. Therefore it should be added to the login to solve the problem. It can be done on SQL Management Studio by right-clicking the user then go to Properties>Server Roles. I encountered the same error and resolved it by doing exactly that.

I'm going to add what I've had to do, as it is an amalgamation of the above.I'm using Code First, tried using 'create-database' but got the error in the title.Closed and re-opened (as Admin this time) - command not recognised but 'update-database' was so used that. Same error.

In my case it is caused by domain name in connection string. I have an assumption that if DNS server is not available, it is not able to connect to database and thus the Entity Framework tries to create this database. But the permission is denied, which is correct.

User instances allow users who are not administrators on their local computers to attach and connect to SQL Server Express databases. Each instance runs under the security context of the individual user, on a one-instance-per-user basis.

The solution to this problem is as simple as eating a piece of cake.This issue generally arises when your user credentials change and SQL server is not able to identify you .No need to uninstall the existing SQL server instance .You can simply install a new instance with a new instance name . Lets say if your last instance name was 'Sqlexpress' , so this time during installation , name your instance as 'Sqlexpress1' . Also don't forget to select the mix mode (i.e Sql Server Authentication & Windows Authentication) during the installation and provide a system admin password which will be handy if such a problem occurs in future.This solution will definitely resolve this issue. Thanks..

The solution that worked for me was to use the Entity Framework connection string that is created when I ran the database first wizard when creating the edmx file. The connection string needs the metadata file references, such as "metadata=res:///PSEDM.csdlres:///PSEDM.ssdlres://*/PSEDM.msl". Also, the connection string needs to be in the config of the calling application.

the reason for this error may be originate from forwarding of version dependent localdb in visual sudio 2013 to the version independent localDB in VS 2015 onwards, so simply change your web.config file connectionStrings from (localDb)\v11.0 to (localDB)\MSSQLLocalDB and it will certainly work.and this is a good explaination for that Version independent local DB in Visual Studio 2015

Note: The connection-string in the above questions is using SQL-server authentication. So, Before taking the above step, You have to login using windows-authentication first, and then you have to give permission to the user who is using sql-server authentication. Permission like "dbcreator".

I have hosted the master server successfully and copied the installation folder with the directory structure maintained to the slave server. After this, I do not know how to proceed. I have gone through some of the windchill clustering documents but didn't helped me lot.

the master node and slave nodes each have a site.xconf file...for each node, you must edit its site.xconf file - all of the slaves will probably have the same content in their site.xconf file but the master's site.xconf will be different.

Sure, that will work, but taking this approach will be the source of endless errors later -- as someone applies a change to one cluster node and does not do so fully or properly to some of the others.

Instead anyone deploying a cluster should be using rsync, robocopy, or a source control system to robustly mirror one node to all the other nodes (apart from node-specific configuration where this is necessary, which could be kept in a separate xconf). This eliminates issues of unintended discrepancies between cluster nodes.

Using source control is the most compelling approach. You check the entire node installation into a source control repository like Git (or Subversion or whatever). Producing other nodes then involves pulling the installation from the source control repository. The compelling part here is that one can easily obtain a full traceable history of all changes made to the installation, complete with administrative commentary as to why the change was being made. The lack of such traceability is itself often a problem even in non-clustered sites when some issue just suddenly arises and there is no truly reliable record as to exactly what was changed in the software installation recently. One can also use branches in the source control system to represent similar but slightly different deployments, e.g. to represent node specific configurations or test vs. production nodes. That is, of course, easiest on a source control system where branching is really fast and easy, like Git, for instance.

I inherited a db infrastrature that is base on the Multiserver (MSX) feature in SQL Server. All the jobs are configured at the master server. This really causes a lot of inconvience for me in modifying jobs on the fly at the target server. Now i want to defect the target servers from the master but i want to retain the jobs on the target server. I tested this but when i defect a target server from the master server, all the jobs disappare from the target server. I tried even scripting the job from the master server to create the job at the target (after defecting the target server) but it still creates a multiserver job on the target. My question is, can I defect a target server from the master and retain the jobs at the target rather than the master? Help, thanks.

The purpose of having the MSX/TSX server setup is to avoid the "on-the-fly" changes that can introduce errors becuase they're not fully tested. It also provides a single view for checking scheduled job status across multiple servers.

We no longer need the MSX/TSX setup on our db systems that is why i am removing the MSX/TSX setup. What specific script are u refering to? Job Script generated from the MSX or the target? Can you give more details on which option i need to uncheck and where i need to uncheck the option? thanks

I suppose that's your call to make, but having a MSX/TSX setup makes for much easier administration and maintenance, even if you've only got a few servers to look after. Beats connecting to each one to view job status, or to start a job.

Thanks. From you post i can see that you perfer to use the MSX feature. The reason why i am removing this type of db managment is we need each machine to be independent. there will be on dba responsible for each so i don't want on central machine to control all the jobs. so on that MSX machine, there is not fail-safe so if it goes down, the whole setup goes down. Thanks again.

Multiple DBA's supporting multiple SQL Servers ... hmmm ... MSX is still your best bet. Each DBA can script their own JOBs and just select the 'target' servers. System maintenance JOBs could still be centralized. Server health and well being scripts could still be centralized. As for your scripting issue it's a column to update on a table in the msdb database. So you could update the column, script the JOBs then 'defect'. Below is a link to a MS System table map you may find handy:

we currently have a master server on a virtualised windows 2012 box running Netbackup 7.6.0.4 along with a 5230 appliance running 2.6.0.4. We have this setup at 2 different locations, they backup their respective sites and then replicate the backups to each other. The catalog files are also replicated to each other

The question i have please, is how should we go about backing up the virtual master servers. We are using the VMware plugin to backup up our other virtual servers, so can we just backup the master servers this way?

During master server installation, you must enter a NetBackup base product license. You must also enter licenses for any additional NetBackup product options or agents that are used on the server or its clients. These additional licenses must be entered on the master server.

During install and upgrade to NetBackup 8.1.2, please allow the installer to copy the veritas_customer_registration_key.json file to its final destination. NetBackup can set the file permission and ownership correctly through this process. If you place the file onto your systems outside of the install or the upgrade process, the process may not work correctly.

3a8082e126