About your kids

3 views
Skip to first unread message

SEIU721REFORMERS

unread,
Dec 25, 2012, 1:14:16 PM12/25/12
to
Guys,

For years now, I have been attempting to bring the issue of Global Warming to the forefront of our concerns.

In terms of my life, it's not that important when you consider that if I am 64 years old, if I am lucky, I will live another twenty years or so and the issue of Global Warming will not directly threaten my life. 

In terms of your children, grandchildren and their progeny, Global Warming is an eminent threat for them.  Even if you choose to keep your head in the sand.

An empirical threat more so than anything else.

Making the U.S. economy deficit or for that matter anything else including nuclear war, look like child's play.   Sounds crazy.   However, if you understood the impending consequences that mankind is bringing upon itself you would take a good hard look into the eyes of your children, grandchildren and ponder the world that we are leaving them.

We, as a species cannot continue to behave like drunken sailors.

The Scotsman, scientist James Lovelock, is considered the preeminent leading scientist on the subject of Global Warming.

James Lovelock has written off the chance of the human race surviving the impending cataclysmic consequences of Global Warming.

James Lovelock believes it is too late and the consequences of Global Warming are irreversible.

My spin on that is this:  If the ship I was on began to sink out at sea and I was on a life boat that started to take on water, I would start to bail water and fix the leak.   I would not sit on my hands or begin to pray while the water rose in my life boat.

And so it is with Planet Earth.

Educate yourself, your family and community.

Urge your elected representatives to address the issue of Global Warming as your children's lives depend on this.

I apologize for the dismal Yuletide warning.

God Bless

Love, Peace and Happiness

Rafe

***

By Bob Burnett, featured in the Huffington Post

Global Climate Change: Preparing for World War III

Posted: 11/30/2012 9:44 am
React

SHARE THIS STORY

Submit this story

In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, 68 percent of Americans acknowledge, "Global warming is at least a somewhat serious problem." Nonetheless, it's unlikely that Washington has the political will to mobilize America to combat global warming. This grim reality is reminiscent of the beginning of World War II, when the U.S. dithered for 21 months until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor forced us to act.

World War II began on September 1, 1939, when Germany invaded Poland. On May 10, 1940, German troops swept into France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. By mid-June, France and its neighbors had surrendered and the Battle of Britain commenced. Throughout this period the U.S. did nothing. Although President Roosevelt wanted to help our European allies, Congress rebuffed him. It wasn't until after the sneak attack on December 7, 1941, that America declared war.

Just as Germany's military intentions were clear 75 years ago, the consequences of Global Climate Change seem obvious today. In 2009, planetary scientists agreed that an increase in global temperature beyond 2 degrees Celsius would cause horrific damage. Since 2009, we've moved three-quarters of the way to the two-degree target and unprecedented heat waves, severe drought, sharp sea level rises, dissolving coral reefs, and catastrophic weather events like Sandy.

In President Obama's victory speech he noted four immediate challenges facing his administration, "reducing our deficit, reforming out tax code, fixing our immigration system, freeing ourselves from foreign oil." But he also mentioned Global Climate Change, "We want our children to live in an America... that isn't threatened by the destructive power of a warming planet." That's an indication he might launch an initiative. Eventually.

But like the Nazi's march through Europe, the onslaught of global climate change is relentless. It's unclear how long we can postpone action.

In the 21 months between September 1, 1939, and December 7, 1941, U.S. indifference to the war in Europe and Asia was justified by public sentiment, "It can't happen here." Recovering from a severe depression, Americans turned inward, seemingly secure in the knowledge that thousands of miles of ocean separated them from foreign battlefields. And after a decade of economic hardship, citizens were not emotionally prepared for the austerity that war would bring. Then the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor left us no choice.

Hurricane Sandy was an impressive event but probably not sufficient to move Americans to make the sacrifices necessary to curtail global climate change. It's likely that 113th Congress will provide the funds necessary to repair the damage from Sandy, but not call for a national mobilization on the scale last seen when the U.S. entered World War II. After all, it's been 71 years since Americans were last called upon to sacrifice, and we're not used to to taking extreme steps to protect our selves and our families.

1. Abandon use of fossil fuel. Writing in Rolling Stone, environmentalist Bill McKibben observed that we can only emit 564 gigatons of carbon dioxide by 2050 and still have a reasonable chance of keeping the temperature increase below 2 degrees Celsius. Last year we pumped in 31.6 gigatons; at this rate we'll exude 564 gigs by 2028. McKibben pointed out that the proven coal and oil and gas reserves of the fossil-fuel companies are 2975 gigatons , "the fossil fuel we're currently planning to burn." Individuals must stop using fossil fuel and the public has to shut down fossil-fuel companies.

2. Make dwellings energy efficient. Approximately, 78 percent of America's energy use is provided by fossil-fuel. As we stop using coal, oil, and gas, Americans will need renewables that, at the moment, are not available in sufficient quantities. A good first step is to make our homes more energy efficient by thorough insulation, use of a non-fossil-fuel heating system, and conversion to electricity supplied by a renewable source.

3. Move to secure locations. In June 2009, A White House task force produced "Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States." Among its 10 key findings, two relate to where we should live: "Coastal areas are at increasing risk from sea-level rise and storm surge." "Thresholds will be crossed, leading to large changes in climate and ecosystems;" for example, the "Dust Bowl" region will become more vulnerable to drought and wind. Three findings relate to food and safety: "Climate change will stress water resources." "Crop and livestock production will be increasingly challenged." "Risks to human health will increase. Harmful health impacts of climate change are related to increasing heat stress, waterborne diseases, poor air quality, extreme weather events, and diseases transmitted by insects and rodents." Many Americans will have to move away from coasts and storm areas to locations where food and water are available and safe.

These are extreme steps but America has gone through something like this before, after we entered World War II. There were extreme hardships but our people adapted and the American economy thrived. We can do this again if we view global climate change as World War III and mobilize.


--
********************
That's all folks!
 
To subscribe: send reply with the message: subscribe
 
To unsubscribe: send reply with the message: unsubscribe
 
Be sure to notice: [Message clipped]  View entire message at the bottom of page

SEIU Local 721 Reformers is an email address attempting to share information with SEIU Local Members, Stewards, Officers, Staff and Officials.
Rafe Garcia, Steward, is the custodian of this email address.
Those of us sharing, exchanging and participating in this forum are attempting to engage the membership to further the concept of a member driven Union.
We, you and all the rest of us have the best interests of the rank and file members, over 70,000 strong.
FOUNDED AUGUST 31, 2008

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages