SEGNPMS...@gmail.com
unread,Nov 13, 2008, 5:41:55 PM11/13/08Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to SEGNPMSS BUSTED
Is it possible to hide weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in a
country?
Of course, just because nobody finds them doesn't mean that somebody
didn't hid them somewhere.
We all know of Bin Laden. That he isn't found doesn't mean that he
does not exist, right?
Generally, there are nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological
weapons. They can be hid just about anywhere. It is ridiculous saying
that Iraq had not any such weapons just because the few weapons
inspectors that looked for them didn't find them.
So, how come the weapons inspectors found nothing? Because they were
just a few guys and Iraq is a huge country. They did not look in each
farm, hatch, factory, plant, underground facility, submarine, house,
barn, stable, shed, apartment, room, attic, lab, school, basement,
garden house, store, cave, hospital, you name it. A nuclear weapon,
for example may weigh just about a thousand kilograms, in other words,
hiding thousand kilograms can't be that hard. A weapon can be also
dismantled and lateron again assembled,
Biological warfare (BW) are agents that causes diseases as bacterica,
germs, viruses. It is the favorite child of the SEGNPMSS and the
average SEGNPMSS doctor activates the bacterica, germs, fungi, and
viruses with remote control, silent sounds, and microwaves. They fit
in just about any tube, spray or other little container and could be
carried around in any jacket pocket or kept in a bathroom or drawer.
Artillery shells armed with botulinum toxin, anthrax, and aflatoxin
can also be hid in many places.
Chemical warfare (CW) consists of dangerous chemicals as for example
ricin, mustard gas, and lewisite. They also can be hid just about
anywhere, particulary in a country of 168,743 sqm.
There are detection devises but they can be manipulated too, just as
the inspectors themselves. Allegedly 220 inspectors from 49 countries
searched for WMD in Iraq. What a joke. 220 people being a brief while
in Iraq searching 168,743 sqm. To conduct a thorough search, the UN
should have sent 168743 inspectors for 168743 sqm. Also, be reminded
once more that anybody including weapons inspectors are controlled by
the SEGNPMSS. If the SEGNPMSS wants to keep a secret, it will remain
one. The agents either deliberately go along and "overlook" what they
should have found or they are subconciously or otherwise misdirected
and come up empty.
Detection devices might just detect some WMD if they are not under
wrap and if the inspectors are close to their location.
They can malfunction and can be sabotaged by remote controlled germs.
In other words: their alarms might not go off when they should.
There are spy satellites by other nations but as the SEGNPMSS runs
just about anybody, who is blowing the whistle? This is also why Bin
Laden is not being found. SEGNPMSS doesn't want him to be found. They
just promise a higher bounty to those who know where he hides and that
bounty is more than the US had promised. Then they steal the money
somewhere or they get rid of these witnesses without having to pay by
killing them through illness or accident or other means. The "best
success" of the SEGNPMSS is to keep people dumb. They can't imagine
that their case officer turns on them. What fools they are.
The Saddam Hussein government of Iraq was known to use WMD before. In
later years, they might have never generated a paper trail or
distroyed it for their new WMD production. Saddam Hussein's government
possibly dismantled these weapons to avoid a second invasion into Iraq
or transported them to other countries or he indeed destroyed some,
which he likely would have not done otherwise.
But it still makes no sense to claim that Iraq - that was known to use
WMD - would had absolutely none - only because these few weapons
inspectors found none within that large country.
As a summary, Saddam Hussein was a mass murderer and leaving him in
power would have been irresponsible to say the least. However,
starting a war and finding no way to end it fast and successfully is
surely just as irresponsible.
If the Bush administration would have pointed with the finger on the
SEGNPMSS behind the force behind Saddam Hussein, he probably would
have announced his resignation as the SEGNPMSS does not want to be
suspected or be found. Abd as far as the insurgency of Iraq is
concerned, it would have ended the insurgency because the SEGNPMSS is
behind it, and the last they want is to be detected. They want people
should think that they do not exist. It is the most secret of the
secret services and the worst of all.