timer() reviewer feedback

[Sauro Giannerini]

Hi everyone i used timer function to analysed a songs sample of a bird species. The audio files were recorded at a 48kHz/24bit sample rate in WAV format to achieve high sound quality, we also set an amplitude threshold of 15%. 

The reviewer back to me:

 "the authors should manually evaluate the accuracy of the method since the variability of the background noise could affect the measurements"

how can i reply ?

thanks in advance

Sauro Giannerini

[Jérôme SUEUR]

Hello Sauro,

Yes it does make sense. Any automatic treatment should be first controlled with an expert annotation / measurement.

You should then substantial subsample of your dataset, do the measurement manually on this subsamble and compare with timer() output.

HTH

Jerome

---

De: "Sauro Giannerini" <gsau...@gmail.com>
À: "seewave GROUP" <see...@googlegroups.com>
Envoyé: Samedi 2 Juillet 2022 08:44:40
Objet: [seewave] timer() reviewer feedback

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "seewave" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to seewave+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/seewave/ebd7edfa-189a-4d36-8254-918aec5e408fn%40googlegroups.com.