Did we get clarification by interim EC on the points mentioned by Janardhan Amballa

[sriniseestar]

Hello Raghava,

Did we get any response from interim EC on the points mentioned by Janardhan Amballa.
We need to get Data points from the interim EC to get to feasible solution for phase II members.

Regards,
Srini

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Dr. Raghava Cherabuddi <rag...@cvr.ac.in> wrote:

Thanks Janardhan for the quick response.

 

I was an EC member when we were talking to various builders for the Phase 1 project. Not only that we even talked to various builders on land swap option, etc. I was party to all those meetings. We will have the authority to talk and represent the society if we are an EC member.

 

Present situation - 9 EC members with 4 or 5 active members who are actively working on Phase 1 and SEEestates. There are 4 or 5 inactive members who are not doing anything for anyone.

 

We are requesting for this situation to be changed and 4 or 5 new members from Phase 2 to be inducted into the EC to actively work on Phase 2 and this in no way hurts any phase 1 project or SEEestates. The existing active members on the EC will continue as they are.

 

Finally, if any member wants to come forward to contribute and be part of EC, they should be given a fair chance to contest and be elected/or not.

 

thanks

Raghava

 

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Janardhan Amballa <suja...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I think this is a thought provoking mail. If 4 to 5 members of EC members have not attended any EC meetings, whose fault is it? All said and done, very few people come forward to do honorary work. If something is happening in respect of Phase II members, let it continue. Continuance of the present EC will in no way hinder those efforts. Blaming those are doing their best in the interests of all members will in no way help those who want to withdraw. If any Phase II member is interested, he can as well volunteer to be a member of EC, on Co-option basis.

I would request the EC to clarify on the following points.

1. How many members are there, after those who have opted and paid for Phase I?

2. What is the area of land apportiond to :

i) Phase I

II) Phase II

iii) Villa owners, out of the total 11 acres of land purchased from contribution of 6 lacs / 7 lacs from about 600 members?

The above facts will help in arriving at a conclusion as to further course of action regarding giving the phase II for Development to any builder. Considering the present market conditions at Hyderabad, I doubt if any Builder would come forward to induct about Rs.20 crs. to start with. 

For your info, I have not opted for Phase I and I am in the withdrawal list. 

WITH REGARDS
JANARDHAN AMBALLA
 B-204,DHEERAJ KIRAN,CHINCHOLI BUNDER ROAD,

MALAD(WEST), MUMBAI - 400064
E-Mail : suja...@gmail.com & janamba9...@yahoo.com 
MOBILE No: 09987533225 / 09619733225

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Dr. Raghava Cherabuddi <drcvraghava@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi

I am writing this email and sending this to your personal and/or work email. I apologize for that. I thought this is far more important. You may have received similar email from Anupam.

The EC's first term started in April 2009 (after Manas left the EC) and it ended in April 2011. Since then no GBM has taken place in 2011 and the EC is continuing without any permission. A GBM was recently held in September 2012 for which only about 25-30 members attended with no quorum. A follow up GBM also never happened. I was also a part of the EC during its first term and I did not continue after my term ended.

Now the members calling themselves interim EC (without any formal approval from the general body) is seeking another two year term citing smooth functioning etc,. This is clearly violating our bye laws and even if objections are raised by us, the EC members are totally silent on this topic.

We request you to vote a "NO" on the poll to safeguard not only the members interest but as well the interest of Phase 2 members. Till now the interim EC members did not take any steps towards a plan for refunding withdrawal members. The Phase 2 working committee has been working on this and are in talks with some builders to enable members to get a refund.

The existing interim EC has only 5 active members and the remaining 4 are not even attending monthly EC meetings and not even voting on any resolutions. When questions are being raised on the EC members contribution and attendance, there is no response from the EC as well. We have been asking questions about ~Rs. 70Lakhs of our Phase 2 money which was there after Manas left. This was used for Phase 1 activities. We have asked the EC several times including in the most recent GBM and their response as usual was very vague and not satisfactory.

Let some (4 or 5) members from Phase 2 enter the EC so that they will work towards Phase 2 planning and in no way affecting Phase 1. We are only asking the inactive EC members to be replaced with active members from Phase 2. 

You have got a golden chance to vote and we sincerely request you to vote a "NO" on the poll. No member is being requested to contest and be a part of the EC. This is against the basic principles of our society and any democratic system. You can ask these questions to the EC by writing to indus...@googlegroups.com and see if you get any response.

You should have an email from "Prabhakara Rao Alokam (CIVS poll supervisor" with the subject line "Poll: SEEWHA Association - Invoking Bye-Law Article 5.2.6 to request Gerenral Body to Approve term extension for the Executive Committee". It could be in your spam/junk folder as well.

To OPPOSE:

rank 1st for NO (to oppose the EC term extension) and Rank 2nd for YES (to support the extension for current EC members )  

Please reply to this or call me at any time if you have any question on this.

thanks

Raghava Cherabuddi

9963111141

[Ramesh Billapati]

I have never seen interim EC giving direct answers to any of members questions through mail, I can almost classify their standard responses in below format. This EC is not as communicative as they were preceding the chair, don't ignore these signals guys, definitely they are not as open they were before

Interim EC's common replies

1. Come to office and check for data

2. Confidential and may not be shared with everyone

3. By-laws prohibit sharing such data

4. Did you attend last GDM?

Regards,

Ramesh

--