Did the World not know about Gandhi till the film on him was
released?
Ram
Puniyani
In
an interview to ABP on 29th May, Prime Minister Modi stated
that "In the last 75 years, wasn't it our responsibility
to make Mahatma Gandhi known across the world?
Forgive me, but nobody knew Mahatma Gandhi '' till the film on him was released
in 1982. When he was saying this the ABP persons interviewing him had stony
expressions. They did not react to this elementary falsehood being dished out
by the PM. The aim of this statement towards the fag end of the prolonged
campaign for General Elections is not hard to guess.
Severe
criticism of his ten year regime on issues of employment, rising prices, plight
of farmers, paper leaks, Agni veer scheme etc. was getting traction. How to
divert the attention from these core issues of people was his major concern.
This outpouring on Mahatma Gandhi served another function apart from
distracting attention from people's issues; it targeted Nehru and earlier
Congress regimes for ignoring the popularization of Gandhi on the global arena.
More
than criticism of Nehru-earlier Congress regimes, actually it shows Modi’s
ignorance about the life and works of Gandhi, his international prestige and
his role in being the lighthouse for major figures of the World. It shows
Modi’s ignorance about Gandhi’s influence on global politics from the
decade of 1930s itself, much before Richard Attenborough came out with this
biopic on him, based on the biography written by Luis Fisher.
With
Gandhi’s struggles in South Africa he came to be recognized as a major leader
against apartheid. With his coming to India and leading the Champaran movement
for farmers, his friend Charlie Andrews spread to the World the unique nature
of Champaran Satyagrah. His unique tool of Satyagrah based on truth and non
violence began to draw the attention of the World towards the problems of the
weak and exploited.
Later
other movements launched by him; Civil disobedience and Salt March; were widely
covered in the global media. The attention paid to him was mainly a source of
inspiration for the struggle for justice and the involvement of people around
the concerns of the society. His lifework and messages spread with lightning
speed on the global scale. On one hand; the British rulers intensified the
repression in India and on the other those respecting peace, justice and non
violence started noticing Gandhi’s contribution to principles of humanism at
Global level.
While
Modi may not know the real contribution of Gandhi and his great popularity in
the World since that time; he needs to know that the English Newspaper, “The
Burlington Hawk-Eye”, Sunday Morning September 20, 1931, carried a full page
feature on him, “Most Talked about man in the World”. The
renowned American magazine, Time, carried him on the Cover as ‘Man of the year
in 1931’ and on two other occasions he was on the cover of this coveted
magazine. Similarly Time’s companion magazine Life also carried a feature on
him.
The global personalities contributing to the
process of peace and justice through their works and ideas started getting
attracted to him. The major scientist Albert Einstein wrote in 1939, “I believe that Gandhi’s views were the most enlightened of all the political
men of our time. We should strive to do things in his spirit: not to use
violence in fighting for our cause, but by non-participation in anything you
believe is evil,” He said of Gandhi that “Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this
ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth.”
Sir Charles Chaplin, inspired by Gandhi’s
movement, ensured a meeting with him and the reflection of Gandhi’s values is
very much there in his films, ‘Modern Times’ and ‘The Great Dictator’. In the
latter Chaplin contrasts Gandhi with Hitler. Similarly French dramatist Roman
Rollain in the French edition of Young India wrote, “"If (Jesus) Christ was the Prince of Peace, Gandhi is no less
worthy of this noble title."
Two of the major activists of the twentieth
Century, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela drew the inspiration and
direction for the path of their struggle from Gandhi. In an article for
Hindustan times in 1959 King wrote, “I came to see at a very early stage that a synthesis of Gandhi’s method of
non-violence and the Christian ethic of love is the best weapon available to
Negroes for this struggle for freedom and human dignity”
And finally the massive and prolonged
struggles of Nelson Mandela had the underlying values derived from Gandhi’s
life and teachings. He lauded “Mahatma Gandhi combined ethics and morality with a steely
resolve that refused to compromise with the oppressor, the British Empire.”
Modi should just know that today there are a
large number of Universities in the World where Gandhian studies are a part of
their curricula. There are many schools trying to teach his values. Nearly 80
global cities have Gandhi Streets and Gandhi statues installed in their
prominent places.
As far as films are concerned our own Films
Division had come out with a documentary film, made by Vithalbhai Jhaveri much
before Attenborough. As a matter of fact Attenborough saw this film twice and
advised the lead actor of the film, Ben Kingsley to watch it to understand
Gandhi’s mannerisms etc.
As for the Modi allegation that the previous
regimes did not do anything to popularize Gandhi in the World, even in the
making of Attenborough film, Indian Government through National Films
Development Corporation contributed a major sum for making this film. For Mr.
Modi’s information, the Attenborough film is dedicated amongst others to Nehru
also. It was Nehru who advised him not to present Gandhi as a superhuman being,
but as the one with all his weaknesses and strengths as he led the nation.
Gandhi’s international reputation is not due to films but films have been made
due to his fame and reputation. The number of books written on and about him is
an astounding number.
As the election campaign has come to a halt,
on the pretext of this diversionary statement on Gandhi, we can revisit the
father of the Nation, whose teachings on harmony and peace are far more
relevant today than when he preached and practiced those.