Then you may want to forget about buffers and use a predefined mask limited to the extent of the fenced reserve.Murray--On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 6:43:34 AM UTC+12 allant...@gmail.com wrote:Hi MurrayThanks once again for the helpful response. I will refer to secr-habitatmasks.pdf for more information. Yes the game reserve is electric fenced in its entirety and generally restricts hyena movement in and out of the reserve.Regards,Allan.<moves.png>CAPTURE does not have a reliable method for estimating density from your data, so the comparison is unhelpful. Your animals are very mobile so you need a large buffer unless there is a known boundary to the habitat. See secr-habitatmasks.pdf. The buffer does _not_ define an ETA.On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 10:15:07 PM UTC+12 allant...@gmail.com wrote:Hi MurrayThanks so much for your help, very much appreciated. I reran the analysis using the code specifications you provided in your response and reproduced the same result.However, given a study area size of 490 km2, I feel that a buffer of 20000 (i.e. 20 km) would make the effective sampled area too big resulting in an underestimate of the density. Specifying a buffer of 2000 (i.e. a strip of 2 km around the trapping array) would be more realistic but returns the following message:Warning messages:
1: In bias. D(buffer, temptrps, detectfn = output$detectfn, detectpar = dpar, :
bias. D() does not allow for variable effort (detector usage)
2: In buffer bias check (output, buffer, bias Limit) :
predicted relative bias exceeds 0.01 with buffer = 2000
A buffer of 20000 gives a density of 12.26 hyenas/100 km2 (which seems like an underestimate) while that of 2000 gives a density of 21.67 animals/100 km2, which I believe is more practical and comparable to the Program CAPTURE estimate of 23.27 hyenas/100 km2.Does the above warning message render the result technically incorrect?Regards,Allan.On Tuesday, 5 April 2022 at 04:56:26 UTC+2 murray...@gmail.com wrote:Hello AllanAhh. Your R code analyses 'captdata' that is a builtin dataset with simulated animals at about 5.5/ha (see ?captdata)! I also find two probably typos in TrapSECR.txt (missing initial 3 of x-coordinates T13, T72). And you will need a much larger buffer (I suggest 20000). ThenMalHyena.0 <- secr.fit (MalHyena, model = list(g0 ~ 1), buffer = 20000, details=list(fastproximity = FALSE))predict(MalHyena.0)
link estimate SE.estimate lcl ucl
D log 1.226085e-03 2.392799e-04 8.393676e-04 1.790974e-03
g0 logit 2.665433e-02 5.931733e-03 1.719303e-02 4.110439e-02
sigma log 5.085863e+03 6.426653e+02 3.974019e+03 6.508777e+03I used fastproximity=FALSE as it looks like you will want to compare models with time-varying probabilities.MurrayOn Friday, April 1, 2022 at 10:28:32 PM UTC+13 allant...@gmail.com wrote:Hello everyoneI am new to secr and would like to generate population statistics for a spotted hyena dataset collected using camera traps. I have written and run the code but my results are not intuitive or comparable to a parallel analysis I ran in Program CAPTURE. The secr analysis returns a density of 5.5 hyenas per ha which is significantly different to the 0.00233 animals per ha that I got from CAPTURE. Attached are the input files and R code that I used and a Word file with highlighted screenshots of the R output that I find need help with for your reference.
Kind regards,
Allan.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "secr" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/secrgroup/o2xzdn9zCGY/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to secrgroup+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/secrgroup/861b964c-39c4-4e2c-9d68-97ecf2ee2c2cn%40googlegroups.com.
<moves.png>
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "secr" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/secrgroup/o2xzdn9zCGY/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to secrgroup+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/secrgroup/3facd5a8-9109-4181-aa5f-3a9a8d235b53n%40googlegroups.com.