--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/37f85ae1-ce67-4706-b3ab-93a8343d80fen%40googlegroups.com.
The reason, as I recall, that we had gone the route of the CF
sockets was that people had had problems with the IDE-CF adapters
on occasion (especially with the cheap ones), and so if they are
not required then we should just skip them. It's really a
reliability/integrity issue, not cost.
That being said, I guess we could put the 40-pin IDE pads in there as well, but the wiring is not straight-forward. If it requires additional components then we may want to reconsider. Of course, we have to give the disclaimer that this is NOT an IDE connection - it is strictly for CF card adapters.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SN6PR01MB385502B978DAF23A58AD36EBF7D19%40SN6PR01MB3855.prod.exchangelabs.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SN6PR01MB385502B978DAF23A58AD36EBF7D19%40SN6PR01MB3855.prod.exchangelabs.com.
We've also had "experts" volunteer to do soldering, for surface-mount components but this might also fall into that category for some. I'd guess it is the same level of difficulty as the PLCC socket for the Z180 (which is no longer available in PLCC).
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CABvWWganNazopdyZUrO37YWdztj7wAfDmxEDqxt1h-7sgoOefg%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/DS0PR01MB8011DF54A2976DDE70069D00A1D19%40DS0PR01MB8011.prod.exchangelabs.com.
I need to hear this "incompatibility" explained. All CF cards support 8-bit mode, unless you're talking about some 30-year-old one that didn't conform to the specification. This is NOT the hard-wired 8-bit mode, but is explicitly enabled using the Feature register/command. The "Identify Device" command works just like Read Sector, so 8-bit mode will transfer the data just fine.
I'd like to see details on what doesn't work, the code being
used, and specifics of the card. Otherwise, this just sounds like
fearmongering.
Unless Joe can come back with some proof, lets just keep moving forward. I can give Norberto a program to dump the results of the Identify Device command, if necessary just to settle the issue.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CABvWWgaZc%2BnXt3MJ6aw6RFAfZ0EmA9WLnV8cG%3D-kjgqC%2BPw9Bw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sebhc/t1-gklvz4QU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/6e2a4417-f925-26be-8272-3d63d86ce960%40neurotica.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/54a87edf-6f9a-60d6-3700-a6e566dbbf7a%40gmail.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sebhc/t1-gklvz4QU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CABvWWgYOdiGuMfuK8FaA-BnQt-Gpj0oVtDpq8NWWQ5d3k0nqXQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Rick,
That was true as the CPU was running at 33MHz, and the CF card was very unstable at such speeds, even with wait states.
As we have a lot of space on such CF board I will add to have both connectors. It will be a while as soon I finish the pending boards in the queue.
Attached is a picture on how it will look. It is going to support a single CF card on the 40pin IDE connector and not the dual CF adapter.
Norberto
.
No worries and great feedback received.
Also, your current 8080A image should work on this card just fine. Once you get this CF card booting, then I will need a copy of the images (HDOS, HDOS3, CP/M) to be able to boot it from the new 8080A monitor and on the Z180 board.
Norberto 😊
.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SN6PR01MB3855FCBBFAD910A6141D15A6F7D69%40SN6PR01MB3855.prod.exchangelabs.com.
And for some applications, e.g. Z67-IDE/IDE+ you can avoid moving the LEDs and jumpers by soldering the right-angle 40-pin connector at an angle, e.g. here’s how Norberto recommends building the Z67-IDE/IDE+. This works well:
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAGQDgBCBA04HavbRx4o-hUzqZk2OVJzD2rb%2BqxpRYXjvyQxgtg%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/916dbb7b-45b6-4d53-a53c-7103e3680009n%40googlegroups.com.
Norberto - yes, the SYBA brand CF-IDE adapters are still available on Amazon. If you design the board to use this adapter, everyone building the board must know to purchase this exact make/model of SYBA CF-IDE adapter. All the no-brand CF-IDE adapters currently sold by vendors on Amazon, eBay and elsewhere use the "new" design - which can only be used if they are installed backwards.
--On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 11:59:37 PM UTC-8 Norby wrote:
I still see the same I have in Amazon.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/916dbb7b-45b6-4d53-a53c-7103e3680009n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SN6PR01MB385539DF2B5A88A4856597A8F7D69%40SN6PR01MB3855.prod.exchangelabs.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SN6PR01MB38554DEE330AB71DE8ACE838F7D69%40SN6PR01MB3855.prod.exchangelabs.com.
That is already done. For this board my direction was the following:
Notes: Do not install D13 and D14. Do not install C10 and C11 (100pf)
Please make sure C10 and C11 are not installed as the HW circuit will handle such timing. I added them just in case it was needed. I will leave them in case we encounter a CF card that doesn’t behave per specs.
You are almost there. I want to see this baby booting HDOS, HDOS3, and CP/M at your end very soon.
😊
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAGQDgBC4K6a%3DjfhwELaU0iEyc9VMkeweFnBQWUPj%3DaPto9b66Q%40mail.gmail.com.
Also forgot to mention than on the proto board some IC’s labels are missing. I had to use the schematics to find their values. I’m attaching a low resolution picture so that you can use as a reference to be sure the proper IC’s are in place.
Sorry about that.
Norberto
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SN6PR01MB3855F51CE98A66391FD6BD7CF7D49%40SN6PR01MB3855.prod.exchangelabs.com.
Sure! Do you need the GAL I/O decoder?
The schematic is also at the website:
http://koyado.com/heathkit/New-H8-Website/download/h8-dual-cf-storage%20(1).pdf
Jumpers:
JP5 – 2-3 as shown
JP6 – 2-3 as shown
JP3 /IORQE – 2-3 as shown
JP4 Reset_H_L – 2-3 as shown
JP2 WR_L = LCH position
JP1 RD_L = LCH position
JP23 Buffer-On/Off = jumper on. (JP23)
Hope this helps,
Norberto
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAGQDgBDwqH4kezPf31JE3C7kX5Y%3DFdF95JeQYYo77qiJo5cWBg%40mail.gmail.com.
Joe,
I just added to the website the GAL I/O decoder.
Link: http://koyado.com/heathkit/New-H8-Website/download/dual_cf-gal-io-decoder.zip
Norberto
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SN6PR01MB38551BDB6B0E23550C177287F7D49%40SN6PR01MB3855.prod.exchangelabs.com.
Joe,
I’m going to leave the CF connector board as it is with the new fixes and give it to Todd for production. It is too much work to add two more IDE-CF adapters and to keep the CF connector as well.
This new controller has the capability to support 4x-CF adapters as master. So you could have the following combination:
I rather create a new controller using the IDE-CF adapter to support the 4 CF cards as master, and it will be easier as all connectors are the same.
It might look like this; does this works for you? It will be the same schematics with just the connector change, to keep it compatible with the CF adapter boot driver.
Norberto
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Joe Travis N6YPC
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 9:31 AM
To: SEBHC <se...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [sebhc] H8 Dual CF Controller build...
I'm nearly done building the H8 Dual CF Controller board and have a few comments I thought I'd put out to the group and maybe get your thoughts:
(1) Having built the previous version which used the IDE-CF adapters and this new version which uses just a CF connector, I'm concerned over the average kit builder's ability to properly solder the CF connector. The pins as well as the pitch of the pins is very small. To avoid bridging, soldering these requires a small tip with lower temperature and the use of fine (.015") solder is recommended. Some may also require the use of a magnifying lens while soldering.
I suggest a re-spin of the board to accommodate the option of using the CF connector or the IDE-CF adapter. If the reason to use the CF connector instead of the IDE-CF adapter was to save money, it doesn't. The CF connector cost $8.64 (DigiKey) each while the IDE-CF adapter is $7.59 (Amazon) for two. Reworking the IDE-CF adapter isn't a big deal, just need to relocate the 3 LEDs and 2 jumpers to the back of the board to get it to mount flush.
(2) I just discovered the new version didn't implement 16 bit addressing of the CF which makes the CF cards from the previous version incompatible. While this may seem to only affect a few of us (who spent days / hours transferring files onto the CFs) it also prevents the ability to read the CFIDENT to determine capacity, etc. for PREP and PART.
If the H8 Dual CF board gets re-spun, I'd also encourage the addition of a latch to accommodate the upper 8 bits of address. This change won't affect the work that was done for CP/M3.
Regards,
Joe Travis n6ypc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/37f85ae1-ce67-4706-b3ab-93a8343d80fen%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SN6PR01MB38558CE0E33DA11E7ADC6254F7D89%40SN6PR01MB3855.prod.exchangelabs.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SN6PR01MB3855970426D0DD255E777658F7D89%40SN6PR01MB3855.prod.exchangelabs.com.
Digikey part number is SAM9213-ND.
Norberto
Norberto
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/34f11e3d-ddcd-4aa3-a7d0-eda366554afen%40googlegroups.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sebhc/t1-gklvz4QU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/34f11e3d-ddcd-4aa3-a7d0-eda366554afen%40googlegroups.com.