On 03/18/2013 05:24 PM, Chris Elmquist wrote:
>>>> Ah, another who shares my disdain for IDEs.
>>>>
>>>> But to be fair, though, most (all?) IDEs actually have command-line
>>>> compilers underneath.
>>>>
>>> But...but... It Does Everything! :D
>>
>> Including things you don't want it to, and sometimes in ways you don't
>> want it to!
>
> or, always in a way you don't want it to.
>
> I pity the fool that cannot type "make".
Yep.
> These days, I choose my silicon for big customer projects at work
> based on whether or not they have drunk this koolaid. If the vendor
> does not offer a command line toolchain (that runs on Linux actually)
> or support the community that offers an open-source one, then I'll go
> elsewhere for the chips. It used to be Microchip were on the short end
> of this stick but they seem to have gotten a clue while Atmel seem to
> have lost the clue.
Same here. I've been screwed TOO MANY TIMES by $BIG_CORP...I won't
depend on stuff that I don't have source code for.
I'll take ten thousand enthusiasts' eyeballs on the compiler sources
over fourteen downtrodden job-hating corporate clock watchers' eyeballs
any day.
That said, though...there is *always* a command line toolchain under
there. You can even drive the Xilinx FPGA software from Makefiles, even
on a Wintendo.
> Freescale never had a clue and send me to IAR for
> $5000/seat IDEs. Ha. See ya.
I honestly don't know how Freescale stays in business anymore. It
must just be inertia from huge clueless companies with huge clueless
engineering departments.