--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAGQDgBDZKnq-M3cjLyn%2B2wSFBMm_aVu7GX%3D-kzxtc%2BtnN4665A%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAH3FyKH6iYSwotCbtJkQokS-BLQNeJJhFbRLDZb%2BpibwK3hEYg%40mail.gmail.com.
So thanks for posting this discussion, Joe. it’s been a little quiet here lately. My two cents on top (hopefully I won’t go overboard on information dump!):
Technically the ROM-based RAM test goes from 40.100 to the top of RAM minus 64. The 100 (octal) bytes of RAM at the bottom are used by the panel monitor and the 64 (decimal) bytes at the top are the stack area. As Joe says, in an ORG0 configuration you can’t test the bottom 8K in place as relocated ROM code resides there. Best bet is to move (preferably via reconfiguration of boards) that portion of RAM to an upper address space for testing as Joe suggests.

You can then set HL and DE accordingly to test the range you need. The attached Excel spreadsheet may be useful for this.
Happy to try and answer any questions this discussion may generate…
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAGQDgBDSNv9xej30DT7SfBiDsT4Ceg%3DLgaJNafk06Tpv%2B%3D7ghQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/1e1201dc7cbd%241bfbc420%2453f34c60%24%40gmail.com.
Thank you Glenn! You can say I'm a practitioner of the KISS principle and tend to leave out details which some might have difficulty understanding or not necessarily care about. I do appreciate all of the additional info you provided and wish it was composed as an article and published in REMarks.For anyone following along, the method I described is what "I use" to bring up an unknown system. I minimize the hardware down to the essentials, CPU and RAM then go from there. Some memory failures won't allow you to boot let alone run a better memory test. It seems to me that using a different CPU board such as the H8-808A-64KB-RAM-ORG0 only complicates / confuses the matter and isn't really necessary. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not poo-pooing the idea - go with what you know. I will deviate from my basic procedure if / when necessary.I didn't mention the H89 memory test because I was talking about the H8. Testing the H89 uses a different procedure.Best Regards (and I mean it),Joe
On Sat, Jan 3, 2026 at 9:27 AM <glenn.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
So thanks for posting this discussion, Joe. it’s been a little quiet here lately. My two cents on top (hopefully I won’t go overboard on information dump!):
Technically the ROM-based RAM test goes from 40.100 to the top of RAM minus 64. The 100 (octal) bytes of RAM at the bottom are used by the panel monitor and the 64 (decimal) bytes at the top are the stack area. As Joe says, in an ORG0 configuration you can’t test the bottom 8K in place as relocated ROM code resides there. Best bet is to move (preferably via reconfiguration of boards) that portion of RAM to an upper address space for testing as Joe suggests.
<image001.png>
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAGQDgBCrfEc7BXkXxjaobXprb%3DD%2B0viJowBmMpA9QmNijWL6iA%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/8C221EB9-4236-4342-8B70-F0ADAF8351C8%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/26bc01dc7d1b%24791b6620%246b523260%24%40gmail.com.
Good ideas Mike, thanks. One thing we could use is a “FAQ” (maybe essentially your “tips” idea). We do get the same questions asked many times. Not sure I’m ready to take that one on but it would be useful…
To add USB (VDIP) to an H8 you can either use one of the CPU/Daughterboard combinations (e.g. Z80 Rev4) or, to keep your current CPU use the H17/VDIP1 floppy controller board H8 H17 VDIP1 FSB. I’m not sure if the instructions indicate how to build out just the VDIP portion but that’s not a bad idea. The board should be available from Todd Goodman (I can’t check at the moment – the server for his site seems to be overloaded?). Not sure I’d recommend building out Norberto’s old stand-alone H8 USB board but the gerber files are there if someone wanted to. Terry’s design has some nice improvements. I’ll see if I can work with him to get this posted more visibly (see my goals list ☹ )
The VDIP1 boards can be hard to find. Currently Mouser is out of stock but has them on order. You can substitute the V2DIP1-48 as it is functionally equivalent and physically compatible (24 pins, though the jumper settings are configured differently). The V2DIP1-48 uses square pin headers so it won’t work with a machined socket (use dual leaf style instead).
Mouser: https://mou.sr/4nDaO55 (389 in stock @$21.56)
Digikey: https://www.digikey.com/short/f71tqwp1 (21 in stock @$24.20)
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAHs3Uu00RONk9dRqneE0FVdF7eKxreX-K51oeA1mekt%2BXyaayA%40mail.gmail.com.
My list is as follows:
Build the H88 I picked up from eBay and have a working H89
Build the H89-Z37 board
Attend VFC Midwest
A small list but I’ll be happy if all is working at the end of the year!
Fred G
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SA3PR01MB791847163F6EAF9698FD7163F7B9A%40SA3PR01MB7918.prod.exchangelabs.com.
Great. Keep it realistic.
Suggest you break #1 into two: 1) first build the ’88 exactly as specified in the Heath instructions, then 2) figure out what’s needed to upgrade it to an ’89 and do the upgrade).
I know you’re still counting the days ‘til retirement 😊
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/008601dc801c%24d808b080%24881a1180%24%40gmail.com.
Hi Glenn,
That is the plan. Do you know anyone that has a cassette with HDOS on it? That is the piece I don’t have. If I can’t find that, I’ll build the H88, do all the test/checks, etc. and then add a floppy next. Once that works, add memory, then add the serial card.
And not that I’m counting days to retirement (81 total days, 57 working days) yes I can’t wait!
The nice part about the next 3 months is I have no accounts assigned to me, I’m just training a new person so very low stress and it will give me time to start the H88 and get paid doing it 😊
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/001c01dc8026%24bae625f0%2430b271d0%24%40gmail.com.
So it’s a bit of a misnomer to talk about “HDOS on tape”. The D in HDOS is “Disk”. Maybe HTOS? (Heath Tape Operating System)? But back in the days of tape Heath didn’t have a brand for the whole system. Instead it was a bundle of five components: 1) the Panel Monitor (PAM), which is actually in the firmware of the H8; 2) the console debugger (BUG-8); 3) the Heath text editor (TED-8); 4) Heath Assembly Language (HASL-8); and Benton Harbor BASIC (which came in two flavors BH BASIC, which needed only 8K of RAM, and Extended BH BASIC, which required 12K). The documents for these components are on the SEBHC site:
https://sebhc.github.io/sebhc/documentation.html
(scroll down to Software Reference…)
There are likely some SEBHC members with copies of these tapes, I’ll let them weigh in if they care to. (I believe the H88 version was different than the H8 version? Not sure.) I’m not aware of any .WAV (audio scans) of these tapes on line. Mark Garlanger does have .WAV copies of HUG 885-1009 which is the first volume of Heath User Group software, which was released on tape.
https://heathkit.garlanger.com/software/library/HUG/
Another option is to modify your H88’s serial board to download files digitally. The digital versions of the tools are on the SEBHC site:
https://sebhc.github.io/sebhc/software.html#Cassette_Tape_Images
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/006801dc80df%247d7f0150%24787d03f0%24%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/038401dc8104%24ca2559d0%245e700d70%24%40gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SA3PR01MB7918F4841CE1906ABCCD0E98F782A%40SA3PR01MB7918.prod.exchangelabs.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SJ2P223MB1150AA63880BDD0EE453F4F3F982A%40SJ2P223MB1150.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/229412FB-756F-4D5B-B874-FB4937C0C17C%40gmail.com.
Great to see you have all the “HTOS” WAV files there Mark!
Fred: you can also use an electronic device to play these if you don’t have a tape player. For example, I used an iPad to convert Mark’s .WAV files (the HUG tape) into digital form (H8T). As I recall I had to set the volume high (90%?):
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAAjkm7-MGSG-3WXAzHavtVqsTU_OOUo1ith9USHH7XYLPAbKow%40mail.gmail.com.