On 4/27/24 11:26, Steven Feinsmith wrote:
> I tried a different method that proved less effective than the original
> floppy hard sector. It was a waste of my time. I had 20 boxes of hard
> sector diskettes manufactured by Nashua, but the surface had degraded
> due to their age. As they were covered under a lifetime warranty, I
> wrote a letter to Nashua. However, they responded that the product was
> no longer available as they had destroyed the manufacturing machines.
> They apologized for the situation. There was nothing that they could do
> to help me to resolve this issue.
:-(
Some "lifetime warranty". They should've been sued.
> Users stopped using floppy drives long ago as they sought better storage
> media. However, if we had forced the manufacturers of floppy diskettes
> to continue producing them, we would have plenty of them in stock. It's
> worth noting that the United States government still uses floppy
> diskettes for its equipment that controls nuclear warfare.
...which is exactly what we want, as they're more reliable than
"modern and thus automatically better" things like flash-based thumb
drives and SD cards. If they were a problem, they'd be gone.
I have floppy disks that I wrote in 1985 that are still perfectly
readable today, same contents, not reformatted. I have thumb drives
from last year that are dead.
People rush to replace floppy disk subsystems with emulators and such
all day long, but often for the wrong reasons. Convenience, yes, sure I
get that. That's perfectly valid. But reliability? No. When
correctly repaired and properly maintained, floppy drives are very
reliable in general. A lot of the media, if it has been stored
properly, is very reliable in general.
People argue with me about that all the time, but I point to LSSM,
which is positively awash in perfectly functional floppy disks and
drives. The proof is in the results.
If people want to replace floppy disks for convenience, fine. If
they want to replace them because they can't or won't maintain their
equipment, fine. But it's simply not the case, to anyone but a
salesman, that they are inherently or automatically unreliable just
because the bulk of the consumer world has moved to something else.
> I know that
> Sony was the last company to stop selling floppy diskettes.
Athana International. Still in operation, as far as I know, though
I've not checked.
> That would be fine Unless users want a floppy diskette system for museum
> purposes.
Which some do, myself included, and that's ok.
-Dave