Re: Potty-Mouth O'Reilly
ex_cathedra
> <retro...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:hvbrm0h0qm47lv92b...@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:38:51 -0700, "Clave"
> > <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
> >
> > >"The Smoking Gun" is there:
> > >
> > >http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html
> > >
> > > OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a
> > > multimillion dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News
> > > producer fired back at the TV star today, filing a lawsuit
> > > claiming that he subjected her to repeated instances of
> > > sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her
> > > about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the
> > > loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies.
> >
> >
> > Ah another right wing pillar of morality.
> >
>
> ah another judgment based on kneejerking.
>
> oreilly may or maynot have done it. it's one person's claim.
>
> but oreilly's obviously guilty, since he is on the right.
Actually I believe it.
His psychosis is self admitted.
He's whined about his abusive upbringing more than once.
That type of behavior coincides with the trauma he endured as a youth.
I recall when he lost his cool and walked out on Terry Gross.
He's a sick one allrighty.
But most of the blue bolshevik neo cons are.
They have Trotskyites like Kristol and Marxist-Maoists like Horowitz
on their team....strong father figures.
And thats just what koo-koo case O'Reilly craves after his maligned
childhood.
Bill O'Reilly Interviewed by Terry Gross on Wednesday, October 8, 2003
[LINK]
Buzz:
Did anybody else hear Bill O'Reilly on Fresh Air today? I couldn't
stop laughing. His accusations of what everybody else is supposedly
doing to him sounded more like a laundry list of his own tantrums and
tactics. I thought Terry Gross was giving him a pretty easy time of
it, letting him dig his own grave, and even steering away from
touchier topics to talk about his growing up in Catholic school, his
difficult relationship with his father (boy, was that
revealing—apparently, his dad is a first-class bully who beat up Bill
on regular basis), and how he became politicized. O'Reilly repeatedly
stated he has no patience with people who attack him personally, and
yet, if I'm not mistaken, he told Gross in one instance that if she
didn't agree with him, she "couldn't read," and in another that if she
thought otherwise he didn't respect her.
Finally, he launched into a tirade about how it would be clear from
the transcript that she'd only invited him on the show to ridicule him
and promote NPR's left-wing agenda. Then he abruptly left. It was
hilarious. In fact, what will be crystal clear from that transcript is
what a giant narcissistic baby Bill O'Reilly is. Oh, oh, oh, and lest
I forget, he made a big deal at the beginning of the show about how
all his enemies use only partial transcripts of his shows/interactions
to bash him, and how he believes in citing only full transcripts, and,
yet, he's posted a partial transcript of his Fresh Air appearance on
his website.
A Buzzflash Reader
* * *
Dear Buzz:
Did you happen to hear Terry Gross' Program "Fresh Air" today on
PBS?She interviewed Bill O'Reilly yesterday (the program aired
today,10/08/03) as he makes the rounds touting his new book, "Who's
lookingout for you?" or some such.
Near the end of the program, she tried to cite a quote from a "People
Magazine" review of the book, but O'Reilly lost it and wouldn't let
her read it. He threw a tantrum, became quite abusive, and stalked off
the show.
Mr. O is a typical bully; he can dish it out, but he sure can't take
it. What a coward! I do hope the assorted media pick it up and run
with it.
He takes great offense when he perceives that he is being attacked
personally, which was his greivance with Ms. Gross, but ironically,
the quote she was trying to cite was the reviewer in "People" telling
how after he reviewed O'Reilly's first book "The Spin Zone"
critically,O'Reilly went on his own show the next day and ranted about
the critic, calling him a pin-head. I guess personal attacks are fine
as long as O'Reilly can do the dishing.
Bully for Bully-Boy Bill.
Ron Weinert
* * *
Buzz:
Bill O'Reilly stomped out of an interview with NPR's Terry Gross. I
don't mean to put down Terry Gross; she's very good at what she does,
but she's not a political commentator and is about as hard-hitting as
whipped cream. But O'Reilly couldn't even get through one of Ms.
Gross's softball interviews without throwing a temper tantrum. This
man is very, very sick. Please go to link above and listen to it.
Some of O'Reilly's comments, along with calling Terry Gross a "smear
merchant":
" Conversation got completely out of hand ... I knew that people were
not going to be fair ...I enjoyed telling the woman off."
Oh, and he said that on his Fox News he's only told people to shut up
"about five times in seven years." I suspect that is inaccurate, but I
don't watch O'Reilly so I can't say. He also denied that he EVER
claimed he won a Peabody Award.
I don't mean to be vulgar, but shit, O'Reilly, just how big a wimp are
you? What a pathetic little wuss you are!
Does anyone have an email address for O'Reilly? I think he deserves
lots of email calling him a sick, pathetic, little wuss.
Please visit The Mahablog at http://www.mahablog.com/
http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/03/10/con03002.html
Submariner
<bug...@tri-sexual.net> wrote in message
news:416EE95E...@tri-parish.net...
>
> "Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello" wrote:
>
> > You can see ol' Bill would be much better off with a
> > Male Catholic Bishop or Pope as his love interest,
> > just from seeing his over-sized eyebrows in action.
> >
>
> As least Ole Bill, is being accused by a woman,
> If he were a democrat the accuser would be democrat faggot.
>
Another self-loather.
Ole Bill likes to buff the bishop, just like you buggerin' swamp denizens do.
ya cap'n TrVth
"Clave" <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote in message
news:10mtu15...@news.supernews.com...
> "Bill Walker" <bill.w...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:3lCbd.105$uk2.51@trnddc05...
>>
>> "Clave" <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote in message
>> news:10mtqn5...@news.supernews.com...
>>> <bu...@tri-parish.net> wrote in message
>> news:416EE630...@tri-parish.net...
>>> >
>>> > If O'Reilly were a democrat, he would be suit by democrat faggot.
>>>
>>> Sorry, bubba, but I don't speak moron. Try English.
>>>
>>> Jim
>>
>> Sorry Clave.. seems like you got two of them in your area, now...
>> LOL..Since
>> they seem to have become close, I just wonder if ol' Bubba is another one
>> of
>> those "pet lovers" like his friend Kap'n Kartoons..
>>
>> Hmmm.. don't ya'll have a few laws that prohibit that sort of activity...
>> ??
>> <chuckle>
>
> I know we do here, but they apparently do things a little, um,
> *differently* where Cap'n Jeffy lives. He telecommutes to
> seattle.politics from Maine.
>
> Jim
And Clave telecommutes to Alt.Fan.Rush-Limbaugh from Rio Linda...
Hehe... What freakin' mess you silly ass-clowns are.
*ARF!
Jeffy in Maine AKA
(DINK)
Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello
"oxy" <o...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:CLhbd.2313$6k2....@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>
> i should note that in the fight against sexual harassment (and for
> justice)
> i have yet to hear one leftie OR rightie ever come out to oppose WA
> states'
> ridiculous twoparty consent rule for recording of conversations
>
> without a change to one party consent (like so many other states) have we
> do
> an injustice to victims everywhere
>
bu...@tri-parish.net
retro...@comcast.net wrote:
> Ah another right wing pillar of morality.
I suppose your a democrat who perfers to stick your pillar in other
man's ass, right?
>
>
>
oxy
"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
news:ckmt4n$d7o$1...@drizzle.com...
> In article <slibd.3436$gy1....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> oxy <o...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> ><retro...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >news:hvbrm0h0qm47lv92b...@4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:38:51 -0700, "Clave"
> >> <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >"The Smoking Gun" is there:
> >> >
> >> >http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html
> >> >
> >> > OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a
> >> > multimillion dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News
> >> > producer fired back at the TV star today, filing a lawsuit
> >> > claiming that he subjected her to repeated instances of
> >> > sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her
> >> > about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the
> >> > loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies.
> >>
> >
>
> common reaction to use of a vibrator?
>
no, that is grouchie kneejerking. he's assuming it's true
i don't make assumptions, regardless of target, based on mere unfounded
allegations
grouchie only does so when it's a rightwing target
>
> >oreilly may or maynot have done it. it's one person's claim.
> >
> >but oreilly's obviously guilty, since he is on the right.
>
> As someone who finds Ken Schram's baseless allegations convincing,
really? i didn't find the allegations against clinton by schram convincing
at all UNTIL the semen stained dress was produced. you are either lying, or
mistaken. which is it? any evidence that i did so? of course not.
because i didn't.
that's called INCONTROVERTIBLE evidence (semen stains) that there was sexual
contact between monica and bill. and THEN clinton confessed
so, stop making stuff up.
i never played into the schram crusade, and in fact i criticized the right
for trying to crucify clinton
so, stop making stuff up
> you're in no position to lecture anyone about fairness and the
> proper use of evidence.
yes, i am. and you are lying about my positions
hth
whit
>
>
>
>
> --
> ShrubQuote Of The Week: "When a drug comes in from Canada, I wanna make
> sure it cures ya, not kill ya. ... And what my worry is is that, you know,
> it looks like it's from Canada, and it might be from a Third World."
Eric da Red
<retro...@comcast.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:38:51 -0700, "Clave"
><ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
>
>>"The Smoking Gun" is there:
>>
>>http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html
>>
>> OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a
>> multimillion dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News
>> producer fired back at the TV star today, filing a lawsuit
>> claiming that he subjected her to repeated instances of
>> sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her
>> about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the
>> find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an incredible
>> page-turner that quotes O'Reilly on all sorts of lewd
>> matters. Based on the extensive quotations cited in the
>> complaint, it appears a safe bet that Mackris recorded some
>> of O'Reilly's more steamy soliloquies. For example, we point
>> you to his Caribbean shower fantasies. While we suggest
>> reading the whole thing, TSG will point you to interesting
>> sections on a Thailand sex show, Al Franken, and the climax
>> of one August 2004 phone conversation.
>>
>>That O'Reilly -- nothing but class.
>
>From his countersuit (I'm reminded of his pointless ego laden "libel"
>suit against Al):
>"While acknowledging that he shared "dinner and cocktails" with
>Mackris--and even watched a presidential press conference alone with
>her in his hotel room--he denied engaging in any physical or sexual
>assaults or "offensive touching."
"Presidential Press Conference?"
Is that what they call it now?
>http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013042oreilly1.html
>
>Maybe I'm old school but married men who rant about others morals
>shouldn't be entertaining other women in his hotel room at night.
I don't care much either way. However, folks who buy this book
might be interested:
ya cap'n TrVth
"Clave" <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote in message
> <bu...@tri-parish.net> wrote in message
> news:416EE696...@tri-parish.net...
>> At least O'Reilly was fucking a woman, unlike democrats who sticks their
>> dick in
>> other men ass.
>
> You talk about gay sex a lot.
>
> Jim
There's a name for *suppposedly* straight people that martyr themselves for
every silly gay issue that comes along. But I don't speak the Gay Lingitty
and Mitchum won't tell me what the name is. ( I do know that gays can't
stand these people) but they tolerate them because they are so pusy pushy
pushy on the moronic gay issues.
But whatever those people are called, Clave is one of 'em.
-Cap
Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello
"oxy" <o...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:p9Bbd.3280$6k2....@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello <visualize.w...@sweet.pussy.juice> wrote
> in message news:EDlbd.2459$vJ.816@trnddc05...
>> Quite The Leap Of Logic There, Witless!
>>
>
> not at all. the law in WA state on this issue is fundamentally wrong.
> and
> it was passed AFTER a state employee was caught in a scandal by somebody
> USING a tape recorder to gather evidence against him. the law is
> injurious
> to the search for justice, to individual rights, and to the truth
>
> whit
Bill Walker
<retro...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:eodtm0l46qj2doq3v...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:08:06 GMT, "Bill Walker"
> <bill.w...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >.. Laura is pretending to be the "all american wife".. Shrub is
> >declaring his family values and the whole corrupt bunch is running scared
as
> >hell...
>
> My wife tells me Laura was on morning TV. She said if they win she
> wants to Launch a national education organization and IF GEORGE LOSES
> she wants to go back into teaching!
>
> You can bet the handlers gave her a talking to.
>
> Here's hoping we can all contribute to solving the TX teacher
> shortage.
LOL... we're planning on that, down here.. But before we turn her loose in
public again.. let's be sure that she has taken a full course of defensive
driving..
I would suspect that Texas might never see her or the Shrub back down here..
Kennebunkport is likely where they'll wind up.. You see.. the Crawford
people are fed up with all the shenanigans of Dubya.. There is a great deal
of resentment in that rural community..
The Ranch (sp.Hog Farm) is not a favorite part of that area...
Bill Walker
Irving, Tx.
>
> ______________
> Bush Cheney - Putting the CON in Conservative
ya cap'n TrVth
OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS POST THIS THING LOL
<bu...@tri-parish.net> wrote in message
news:416EE7C9...@tri-parish.net...
>
> retro...@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> My wife tells me Laura was on morning TV. She said if they win she
>> wants to Launch a national education organization and IF GEORGE LOSES
>> she wants to go back into teaching!
>
> Is you wife male or female?
>
He's a Liarhead, he ain't got no wife.
He doesn't even have his own nym...
He stole "Retrogrouch" so he could ride someone's coat-tails.
Another H-Mo Lefty that frequently mentions his imaginary "wife" is MR.N.
These are losers that look for dates in the shrubbery behind the Men's Rooms
of Rest Stops along the Interstate.
They lie about having NORMAL sexual relations because the are ashamed of the
whole pole-smoking stigma.
Only a total moron would openly admit homosexuality and then try to be taken
seriously about ANYTHING.
But, hey... Who am I to judge people.
Love the sinner, but hate the SIN I say...
That must be why I love to tease these pathetic sadsacks..
Hey, speaking of pathetic Sadsacks, does anyone know how Tim Hill died? I
have a good idea, but I never saw an official Death Certificate.
-Cap
Who Cares!
<retro...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:v1crm0t2k96n9dp11...@4ax.com...
|
| Maybe I'm old school but married men who rant about others morals
| shouldn't be entertaining other women in his hotel room at night.
Or single women under their desks in the Oval Office. Or driving them
off bridges and leaving them in the river.
But then again,
Who Cares!
Steveo
bu...@tri-parish.net wrote:
> "Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello" wrote:
>
>
>>You can see ol' Bill would be much better off with a
>>Male Catholic Bishop or Pope as his love interest,
>>just from seeing his over-sized eyebrows in action.
>>
>
>
> As least Ole Bill, is being accused by a woman,
> If he were a democrat the accuser would be democrat faggot.
>
Nope. It would be Ann "The Man" Coulter.
ya cap'n TrVth
>> <bu...@tri-parish.net> wrote in message
> news:416EE630...@tri-parish.net...
>> >
>> > If O'Reilly were a democrat, he would be suit by democrat faggot.
>>
>> Sorry, bubba, but I don't speak moron. Try English.
>>
>> Jim
>
> Sorry Clave.. seems like you got two of them in your area, now...
> LOL..Since
> they seem to have become close, I just wonder if ol' Bubba is another one
> of
> those "pet lovers" like his friend Kap'n Kartoons..
Thanks for bringing this up Turdwhinder from Quagmire Tx.!
Clave has been trying to put as much distance between himself and his
bestiality post as he can.
But with toothless goobers like you reposting it, he'll NEVER live it down!
Thanks again!
YEEEEEEEEEE HAWWWWWWW!!!
-Cap'n TrVth
bu...@tri-parish.net
oxy
Who Cares! <whoc...@freetidet.org> wrote in message
news:%Ojbd.3539$gy1....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...> news:slibd.3436$gy1....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> |
> | <retro...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> | news:hvbrm0h0qm47lv92b...@4ax.com...
> | > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:38:51 -0700, "Clave"
> | > <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
> | >
> | > >"The Smoking Gun" is there:
> | > >
> | > >http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html
> | > >
> | > > OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a
> | > > multimillion dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News
> | > > producer fired back at the TV star today, filing a lawsuit
> | > > claiming that he subjected her to repeated instances of
> | > > sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her
> | > > about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the
> | > > loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies.
> | >
> | >
> | >
> |
> | ah another judgment based on kneejerking.
> |
> |
> | but oreilly's obviously guilty, since he is on the right.
> |
> was made
> | against him
> |
> | yawn...
> |
> | whit
>
> O'Reilly's on the RIGHT? hmmm.... That PROVES he is guilty. The
> left has STILL not admitted that Clinton was guilty of anything except
> keeping Monica from talking. Oh, and leaving a stain of some sort on
> her nice blue dress.
>
> But then again,
> Who Cares!
>
well, paula jones had to be lying. because she's ugly. and "trailer trash"
it is an exact parallel. women makes a claim about clinton. it is
AUTOMATICALLY suspect. woman makes a claim against oreilly, grouchie
automatically accepts it
yet another case of his "situational logic and ethics"
whit
>
Paul Mitchum
> In article <v1crm0t2k96n9dp11...@4ax.com>,
> <retro...@comcast.net> wrote:
[..]
> >http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013042oreilly1.html
> >
> >Maybe I'm old school but married men who rant about others morals
> >shouldn't be entertaining other women in his hotel room at night.
>
> I don't care much either way. However, folks who buy this book
> might be interested:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6ad5w
I saw O'Reilly on Letterman recently, hawking his new book. When Dave
held it up and said "The O'Reilly Factor For Kids," people in the
audience laughed. They thought it was a joke. I have to confess, I did,
too. And then O'Reilly came out and it wasn't a joke after all, and was
more sad than anything else. O'Reilly chose not to really talk about it,
but had a political discussion with Dave.
--
"I hear the rumors on the internets." -- George W. Bush
Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello
whatever, doofuss...
"Who Cares!" <whoc...@freetidet.org> wrote in message
news:7Qjbd.3541$gy1....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
bu...@tri-parish.net
Bill Walker wrote:
Between O'Reilly and Limbaugh, they've just about trashed all the moralsAt least he was fucking a women........... If he were a democrat, he would be suited by another man.
that Bush has been declaring for the past umpteen years.. LOL.. Limbaugh
is looking at the possibility of doing some time for his drug escapades and
O'Reilly is up to his ears in a sex scandal..
These guys are reallyYou see Mr. Walker. NO one ever said Limbaugh was going to spend time in jail. That's just wishful thinking on your part.
something...huh ?
Cheney is offended because Kerry complimented him on standing by his lesbianWhy did John "Fraud" Kerry mention her name at all, why didn't he mention Barney Franks and Jim McGrevy for example of fine homosexuals.
daughter
.. Laura is pretending to be the "all american wife".. Shrub is
declaring his family values and the whole corrupt bunch is running scared as
hell... If they don't pull this election out of the fire, this crew is allWalker, Your A FUCKING IDIOT.
subject to spending all the fortunes they've scrounged from American
taxpayers, to defend themselves and stay out of prison... Quite a
spectacle..
Bill Walker
Irving, Tx..
Clave
news:ckmtdu$k2f$1...@drizzle.com...
Did you read the reviews? Great stuff.
Jim
Mike Wilcox
bu...@tri-parish.net wrote:
> Well Mr. Walker, unlike you democrats, O'Reily was fucking a woman.
>
>
>
>
>
Actually, no he wasn't, he was pounding his pud thinking about fucking a
woman. It really must suck to be a millionaire tv personality and still
not be able to get laid ;~))
Paul Mitchum
> <retro...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:v1crm0t2k96n9dp11...@4ax.com...
> | On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:38:51 -0700, "Clave"
> | <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
[..]
> | >That O'Reilly -- nothing but class.
> |
> | From his countersuit (I'm reminded of his pointless ego laden "libel"
> | suit against Al):
> | "While acknowledging that he shared "dinner and cocktails" with
> | Mackris--and even watched a presidential press conference alone with her
> | in his hotel room--he denied engaging in any physical or sexual assaults
> | or "offensive touching."
> | http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013042oreilly1.html
> |
> | Maybe I'm old school but married men who rant about others morals
> | shouldn't be entertaining other women in his hotel room at night.
>
> Or single women under their desks in the Oval Office. Or driving them off
> bridges and leaving them in the river.
So you're saying Bill O'Reilly is the moral equivalent of Bill Clinton
and Teddy Kennedy.
Alric Knebel
"oxy" <o...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> i should note that in the fight against sexual harassment (and for
> justice)
> i have yet to hear one leftie OR rightie ever come out to oppose WA
> states'
> ridiculous twoparty consent rule for recording of conversations
>
> without a change to one party consent (like so many other states) have we
> do
> an injustice to victims everywhere
>
Yeah, that does seem to be a pretty stupid law. Makes it hard for you to
gather evidence without a judge's wiretap permission and a lot of
expensively legal stuff.
Alric Knebel
oxy
<retro...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:5o9tm0pvkqpmhjc8c...@4ax.com...
> On 14 Oct 2004 00:22:46 -0700, excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra)
> wrote:
>
> >> ah another judgment based on kneejerking.
> >>
> >> oreilly may or maynot have done it. it's one person's claim.
> >>
> >> but oreilly's obviously guilty, since he is on the right.
> >
> >Actually I believe it.
> > His psychosis is self admitted.
> > He's whined about his abusive upbringing more than once.
>
>
> oddly worded as to suggest a tape recording exists.
>
if there is a tape recording that's an entirely different story.
fwiw, WA state has a law requiring two party consent (with some exceptions)
it's a terrible law
the law in WA state on this issue is fundamentally wrong. and it was passed
AFTER a state employee was caught in a scandal by somebody USING a tape
recorder to gather evidence against him. the law is injurious to the search
for justice, to individual rights, and to the truth
\
people who are interested in justice and truth should oppose this law. it
should be repealed.
whit
Eric da Red
>> On 14 Oct 2004 00:22:46 -0700, excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> oreilly may or maynot have done it. it's one person's claim.
>> >>
>> >> but oreilly's obviously guilty, since he is on the right.
>> >
>> >Actually I believe it.
>> > His psychosis is self admitted.
>> > He's whined about his abusive upbringing more than once.
>>
>> oddly worded as to suggest a tape recording exists.
>
>that Bush has been declaring for the past umpteen years..
To be fair, they left a few morals for Bill Bennett to trash.
oxy
Paul Mitchum <use...@mile23.c0m> wrote in message
news:1gllxuj.1tqccpt1hfvsmiN%use...@mile23.c0m...
among other things, a difference between oreilly, clinton, and kennedy is
that the allegations about the latter two are proven facts, and the former
is merely an allegation
what is telling is that grouchie instantly assumed it was true by condemnin
oreilly for ALLEGED trangressions. but if it was a leftie being accused he
would do no such thing
whit
Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello
"oxy" <o...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:slibd.3436$gy1....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>
> ah another judgment based on kneejerking.
>
> oreilly may or maynot have done it. it's one person's claim.
>
> but oreilly's obviously guilty, since he is on the right.
>
> i am sure you automatically assumed clinton was guilty when a claim was
> made
> against him
>
Actually, Sexual Perversion has been quite prevalent in the White House for
quite some time.
And, hey what of those pesky leftist Hollywood producer couches of ill
repute?
Oh, Bill O'Reilly is a royal stick up DUHbya's ass, all right.
oxy
"Alric Knebel" <al...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:EjCbd.79689$yp.1...@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
and i should note... this one party consent rule applies to involved parties
iow, if two people have a conversation, one person can't record it w/o
telling the other (with some rare exceptions) . this is very different from
the law in many other states, and thwarts justice. it is not a matter of
eavesdropping or recording OTHER people's private conversations. it is a
matter of recording a conversation one is party TO.
like i said, there are some rare exceptions, but the law is flawed.
conversations between two people are private (to outsiders) but not to
parties involved.
it's a ridiculous law. it makes investigating police misconduct, false
claims against police as well, domestic crimes, and harassment claims
difficult to prove and it makes victims play a he said/she said game
whit
>
Charlie Wilkes
wrote:
He's a hurtin' guy for sure. Got his own TV show but can't even get
laid at work, and somehow I'm not surprised.
Charlie
Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello
>
> O'Reilly's on the RIGHT? hmmm.... That PROVES he is guilty. The
> left has STILL not admitted that Clinton was guilty of anything except
> keeping Monica from talking. Oh, and leaving a stain of some sort on
> her nice blue dress.
>
Yet another witless doofuss scumbag xxxCON speaks DUH 'truth'.
Uh, didn't Bill Clinton, like, er, uh admit to the cigar thing?
I bet you never thought of rubbing some girl's twat with a cigar!
Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello
&
DUH WARTHOG...
whatever.
DUH CHIMP EXITS stage-left, come 1/6/2005!
"oxy" <o...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4bnbd.2691$6k2...@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
ya cap'n TrVth
"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in
> I don't care much either way. However, folks who buy this book
HAH!!!!!!
That's because you can't...
You spent YEARS and YEARS defending Clinton.
Harmless Sex lies etc. etc.
HTH
-Cap
oxy
Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello <visualize.w...@sweet.pussy.juice> wrote
> Which RCW is that, w?
>
here's the chilling part. read the second rcw (9.73.080. this applies to
ALL individuals, not only law enforcement btw. it establishes (essentially)
a right NOT to be recorded by people you are conversing with. this is
patently ridiculous. and it establishes the evidence as inadmissible. even
the exclusionary rule only applies to LEO's. this applies to everybody.
your boss is sexually harassing you. you decide to tape record his
advances. that's a CRIME. and the tape is inadmissible.
it's ludicrous. a cop makes a traffic stop. it is illegal for him to
record the audio portion of the conversation (video is ok) without consent.
LU-DI-CROUS
whit
RCW 9.73.030
Intercepting, recording, or divulging private communication -- Consent
required -- Exceptions.
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, it shall be unlawful for
any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or the state of
Washington, its agencies, and political subdivisions to intercept, or record
any:
(a) Private communication transmitted by telephone, telegraph, radio,
or other device between two or more individuals between points within or
without the state by any device electronic or otherwise designed to record
and/or transmit said communication regardless how such device is powered or
actuated, without first obtaining the consent of all the participants in the
communication;
(b) Private conversation, by any device electronic or otherwise
designed to record or transmit such conversation regardless how the device
is powered or actuated without first obtaining the consent of all the
persons engaged in the conversation.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, wire communications
or conversations (a) of an emergency nature, such as the reporting of a
fire, medical emergency, crime, or disaster, or (b) which convey threats of
extortion, blackmail, bodily harm, or other unlawful requests or demands, or
(c) which occur anonymously or repeatedly or at an extremely inconvenient
hour, or (d) which relate to communications by a hostage holder or
barricaded person as defined in RCW 70.85.100, whether or not conversation
ensues, may be recorded with the consent of one party to the conversation.
(3) Where consent by all parties is needed pursuant to this chapter,
consent shall be considered obtained whenever one party has announced to all
other parties engaged in the communication or conversation, in any
reasonably effective manner, that such communication or conversation is
about to be recorded or transmitted: PROVIDED, That if the conversation is
to be recorded that said announcement shall also be recorded.
(4) An employee of any regularly published newspaper, magazine, wire
service, radio station, or television station acting in the course of bona
fide news gathering duties on a full-time or contractual or part-time basis,
shall be deemed to have consent to record and divulge communications or
conversations otherwise prohibited by this chapter if the consent is
expressly given or if the recording or transmitting device is readily
apparent or obvious to the speakers. Withdrawal of the consent after the
communication has been made shall not prohibit any such employee of a
newspaper, magazine, wire service, or radio or television station from
divulging the communication or conversation.
[1986 c 38 § 1; 1985 c 260 § 2; 1977 ex.s. c 363 § 1; 1967 ex.s. c 93 § 1.]
RCW 9.73.050
Admissibility of intercepted communication in evidence.
Any information obtained in violation of RCW 9.73.030 or pursuant to any
order issued under the provisions of RCW 9.73.040 shall be inadmissible in
any civil or criminal case in all courts of general or limited jurisdiction
in this state, except with the permission of the person whose rights have
been violated in an action brought for damages under the provisions of RCW
9.73.030 through 9.73.080, or in a criminal action in which the defendant is
charged with a crime, the commission of which would jeopardize national
security.
Terry Fields
Those reviews are brutal
"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
news:ckovf9$q8n$1...@drizzle.com...
> In article <10mturi...@news.supernews.com>,
> Clave <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
> >"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
> >news:ckmtdu$k2f$1...@drizzle.com...
> >>
> >> I don't care much either way. However, folks who buy this book
> >> might be interested:
> >>
> >> http://tinyurl.com/6ad5w
> >
> >Did you read the reviews? Great stuff.
>
> Yes. Tee hee.
>
> I wonder when amazon.com will remove all the best reviews?
David Galehouse
> In article <10mturi...@news.supernews.com>,
> Clave <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
> >> might be interested:
> >>
> >> http://tinyurl.com/6ad5w
> >
> >Did you read the reviews? Great stuff.
>
Instead of "Who's Looking Out For You", he should have called it, "Who's
Your Daddy".
Clave
> In article <5PTbd.85108$V06....@fe2.columbus.rr.com>,
> David Galehouse <An...@cinci.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
> ...
>
>>> >> I don't care much either way. However, folks who buy this book
>>> >> might be interested:
>>> >>
>>> >> http://tinyurl.com/6ad5w
>>> >
>>> >Did you read the reviews? Great stuff.
>>>
>>> Yes. Tee hee.
>>>
>>> I wonder when amazon.com will remove all the best reviews?
>>>
>>
>>Instead of "Who's Looking Out For You", he should have called it, "Who's
>>Your Daddy".
>
"Always remember to rinse butt-plug after use. It's the polite thing to do."
-- Bill O'Reilly's Tips for Teens
Clave
>>
>>"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
> ...
>
>>> >> I don't care much either way. However, folks who buy this book
>>> >> might be interested:
>>> >>
>>> >> http://tinyurl.com/6ad5w
>>> >
>>> >Did you read the reviews? Great stuff.
>>>
>>> Yes. Tee hee.
>>>
>>> I wonder when amazon.com will remove all the best reviews?
>>>
>>
>>Instead of "Who's Looking Out For You", he should have called it, "Who's
>>Your Daddy".
>
Paul Mitchum
> In article <10mturi...@news.supernews.com>,
> Clave <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
> >"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
> >news:ckmtdu$k2f$1...@drizzle.com...
> >>
> >> I don't care much either way. However, folks who buy this book
> >> might be interested:
> >>
> >> http://tinyurl.com/6ad5w
> >
> >Did you read the reviews? Great stuff.
>
> Yes. Tee hee.
>
> I wonder when amazon.com will remove all the best reviews?
"Was this review helpful to you? [yes] [no]"
Eric da Red
Clave <ClaviusNo...@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
>"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
>news:ckp95m$764$1...@drizzle.com...
>> In article <5PTbd.85108$V06....@fe2.columbus.rr.com>,
>> David Galehouse <An...@cinci.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
>>>news:ckovf9$q8n$1...@drizzle.com...
>> ...
>>
>>>> >> I don't care much either way. However, folks who buy this book
>>>> >> might be interested:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> http://tinyurl.com/6ad5w
>>>> >
>>>> >Did you read the reviews? Great stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Tee hee.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder when amazon.com will remove all the best reviews?
>>>
>>>Instead of "Who's Looking Out For You", he should have called it, "Who's
>>>Your Daddy".
>>
>> The Vibrator Factor.
>
>http://encodedrecords.com/fark/oreilly-falafel.jpg
Just so you know ...
"We believe that the people behind this lawsuit are on the left. "
http://mediamatters.org/items/200410140011
I wonder if his book has advice for kids regarding personal
responsibility?
Terry Fields
"David Galehouse" <An...@cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
news:5PTbd.85108$V06....@fe2.columbus.rr.com...
>
>
Clave
>>>
>>>"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>> >> I don't care much either way. However, folks who buy this book
>>>> >> might be interested:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> http://tinyurl.com/6ad5w
>>>> >
>>>> >Did you read the reviews? Great stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Tee hee.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder when amazon.com will remove all the best reviews?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Instead of "Who's Looking Out For You", he should have called it, "Who's
http://www.jimgilliam.com/video/osexxxy_factor.mov
Takes a little while to load, but worth it.
Jim
David Galehouse
> >
> >"Eric da Red" <berg...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
> ...
>
> >> >> I don't care much either way. However, folks who buy this book
> >> >> might be interested:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://tinyurl.com/6ad5w
> >> >
> >> >Did you read the reviews? Great stuff.
> >>
> >> Yes. Tee hee.
> >>
> >> I wonder when amazon.com will remove all the best reviews?
> >>
> >
> >Instead of "Who's Looking Out For You", he should have called it, "Who's
> >Your Daddy".
>
>
>
I guess his next *imaginary* broadcasting award will be shaped like a dildo.
It'll be called the "Phone-y".
ex_cathedra
> In article <Wnybd.70$7h.48@trnddc07>,
> Bill Walker <bill.w...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> ><retro...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >news:5o9tm0pvkqpmhjc8c...@4ax.com...
> >> On 14 Oct 2004 00:22:46 -0700, excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> ah another judgment based on kneejerking.
> >> >>
> >> >> oreilly may or maynot have done it. it's one person's claim.
> >> >>
> >> >> but oreilly's obviously guilty, since he is on the right.
> >> >
> >> >Actually I believe it.
> >> > His psychosis is self admitted.
> >> > He's whined about his abusive upbringing more than once.
> >>
> >> As noted also, several of the complaint paragraphs are so detailed and
> >> oddly worded as to suggest a tape recording exists.
> >
> >Between O'Reilly and Limbaugh, they've just about trashed all the morals
> >that Bush has been declaring for the past umpteen years..
>
> To be fair, they left a few morals for Bill Bennett to trash.
Seems to be a pattern =-D