RE: seaint Digest for 23 Nov 2009

[Bill Myers]

Is there any way to go directly to a specific email item without having to
tediously scroll down thru the list?

Today's SEAint Digest has 33 items and is quite lengthy.

Regards,

Bill Myers, P.E., C.W.I.
Neel-Schaffer, Inc.
601.948.3071

-----Original Message-----
From: admin [mailto:ad...@seausa.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 2:00 AM
To: bill....@neel-schaffer.com
Subject: seaint Digest for 23 Nov 2009

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seai...@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
seaint Digest for 23 Nov 2009

Topics covered in this issue include:

1: RE: ACI Grade Beam Construction Joint
by sprag...@hotmail.com
2: Structural Design of Underground Appruntences for Invert Tanks and
Prepoured Pipes
by ghan...@umn.edu
3: Response to an American engineer's query
by gvsh...@yahoo.com
4: RE: Structural Design of Underground Appruntences for Invert Tanks
by Harold Sprague <sprag...@hotmail.com>
5: Grade 8 bolt properties
by "Joseph R. Grill" <jrg...@cableone.net>
6: Re: Quick Help
by David Topete <d.top...@gmail.com>
7: Re: Grade 8 bolt properties
by David Topete <d.top...@gmail.com>
8: Re: Grade 8 bolt properties
by Brad Connelly <connel...@gmail.com>
9: Mat Foundation
by Jason Christensen <ja...@wcaeng.com>
10: Mat Foundation
by Jason Christensen [mailto:ja...@wcaeng.com]=20
11: RE: Mat Foundation
by Harold Sprague <sprag...@hotmail.com>
12: Re: Mat Foundation
by Tom....@fluor.com
13: Katrina was not a natural catastrophe but a man-made one
by Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl <ast...@ce.berkeley.edu>
14: Steel roof deck attached using screws
by Drew Morris [dmo...@bbfm.com]
15: Re: Katrina was not a natural catastrophe but a man-made one
by Alexander Bausk <bau...@gmail.com>
16: ACI 355/355R
by "Thor Tandy" <vic...@telus.net>
17: Re: Grade 8 bolt properties
by Christopher Wright <chr...@skypoint.com>
18: Re: Mat Foundation
by David Topete <d.top...@gmail.com>
19: Grade 8 bolt properties
by jrg...@cableone.net<BR>To: sea...@seaint.org<BR>Subject:
Grade 8 bol=
20: RE: screws to WF
by ake...@cfl.rr.com<BR>&gt=3B To: sea...@seaint.org<BR>&gt=3B
Subject:=
21: Re: Mat Foundation
by David Topete [mailto:d.top...@gmail.com]
22: RE: ACI 355/355R
by Harold Sprague <sprag...@hotmail.com>
23: Re: Grade 8 bolt properties
by Brad Connelly [mailto:connel...@gmail.com]=20
24: "J" For Lateral Torsional Buckling equations
by "Joseph R. Grill" <jrg...@cableone.net>
25: Grade 8 bolt properties<br>
by jrg...@cableone.net
26: RE: "J" For Lateral Torsional Buckling equations
by "Conrad Harrison" <sch.te...@bigpond.com>
27: Re: "J" For Lateral Torsional Buckling equations
by Liaquat Ally Akhand <laak...@gmail.com>
28: Re: Grade 8 bolt properties
by Liaquat Ally Akhand <laak...@gmail.com>
29: Re: "J" For Lateral Torsional Buckling equations
by Liaquat Ally Akhand [mailto:laak...@gmail.com]=20
30: Re: Katrina was not a natural catastrophe but a man-made one
by Stan Caldwell <stanca...@gmail.com>
31: Re: Katrina was not a natural catastrophe but a man-made one
by Stan Caldwell <stanca...@gmail.com>
32: RE: Grade 8 bolt properties
by "Conrad Harrison" <sch.te...@bigpond.com>
33: Re: "J" For Lateral Torsional Buckling equations
by Christopher Wright <chr...@skypoint.com>

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seai...@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

[Stuart, Matthew]

Go to here:

http://www.seaintarchive.org/group/seaint/

Select the time period, and then select the Thread option and input
whatever topic or person you are looking for.

D. Matthew Stuart, P.E., S.E., F.ASCE, SECB
Senior Project Manager
Structural Department
Associate
Engineers and Consultants - CMX
200 Route 9
Manalapan, NJ 07726
732-577-9000 (Ext. 308)
908-309-8657 (Cell)
732-298-9441 (Fax)
mst...@CMXEngineering.com

[Paul Ransom]

Yes and yes.
The location of the load application can influence the nominal capacity of
the member. The difference can be non-trivial. Standards assume loads to be
applied at the shear centre of the section. Refer to SSRC Guide to Stability
of Steel Structures (? check name).

Regards
Paul
--
Paul Ransom, P.Eng.
ph 905 639-9628
fax 905 639-3866
ad...@hwcn.org

> From: David Topete <d.top...@gmail.com>

> I don't believe the point of load application matters as much as the
> stresses in the beam. if you sit a post on a beam or hang a load from the

>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Gary L. Hodgson and Assoc. <
> des...@hodgsoneng.ca> wrote:
>
>> If the load is applied to the bottom flange only, the beam is unlikely to
>> buckle sideways. However as the building code (here in Canada) does not
>> differentiate between points of load application, I would be obliged to

>> Gary
>>
>>
>> G Vishwanath wrote:

>> Threre is no horizontal brace to restrict the unsupported length of the
>> compression flange.I I later got the opportunity to do the calcs.

>> Vish