Steve Easterbrook wrote:
> Key decisions I need input on:
>
> 1) paper submissions - I'd like to keep it open and informal, by not
> having a published proceedings, and invite one-page position papers to
> be circulated in advance online. Any thoughts?
I like this.
I've been thinking about how to make this a successful workshop.
Probably because I don't think I've often been in a workshop that fully
meets my expectations:
* Some of them are too focused on presentations
* Some others want to foster participation, but the strategies used
rarely work as they should. Poster madness sessions are rushed; breakout
sessions are hit-and-miss and those that turn out to be fine often have
their findings diluted when it's time to report back to the larger group.
So, an idea:
Structure the workshop around the position papers. Each paper gets, say,
30 minutes, *but* divided so that you have, for instance, 5-8 min for
presentation and the rest for discussion. The idea being that you
present a problem you've been struggling with, and elicit
solutions/strategies/approaches to deal with it from the audience.
You may have had this kind of workshop before, so you probably know why
it won't work. I don't think I've gone through one like this yet.
Anyway, let me know if you need help with the workshop submission.
Thanks,
Jorge