Maintenance Charge Clarification

[PRAVEEN T]

Hi Association,

As per MyGate records, the maintenance charges per sq. ft. during each association tenure are summarized below for comparison:

Tenure	Q3	Q4	Q1	Q2	Average Maintenance Charge/ tenure
2023–2024	3.8	5.3*	4.5	4.8	4.6
2024–2025	4.9	6.0	5.8	6.2	5.7
2025–2026	7.3*	5.8	5.8	–	6.3

*Including one-time collection of deficits.

From the above data:

• The average maintenance charge in the current tenure is already approximately ₹0.6 higher than the previous tenure.
• Compared to 2023–2024, the current average is nearly ₹2 higher per sq. ft., despite earlier being managed at around ₹4.6 by a team including current treasurer.

In this context, could you please clarify:

1. What specific expenses have increased between 2023–2024 and 2025–2026 that justify this rise?
2. Was the capital/corpus fund utilized during 2023–2024 to maintain the lower average maintenance charges?

As per the MyGate notice published by the current association, in addition to the maintenance charge of ₹6/sq. ft., other components such as backfill and advance tax have been included.

• An amount of ₹0.5/sq. ft. has been collected towards advance tax, totaling approximately ₹9 lakhs.
• However, this amount cannot be found in the expense details (MIS) for the months of September, October, November.

In this regard, could you please clarify:

• Where has this ₹9 lakh been utilized?
• Why is it not reflected in the Q3 expense (MIS) statement?

A transparent clarification on these points would be helpful for all residents.

Regards,

PRAVEEN T

[Sanjeev]

Praveen! You can do better 😊. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sobha Dream Acres Owners - Wing-50" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sda-owner-wing...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-50/CAErV_xnSx%3D%3DtMyr3ng01wch5eGxGx2xKFOu58zJ%2B9-5P%2BNnUAg%40mail.gmail.com.

[PRAVEEN T]

Dear Sanjeev,

I would like to extend my appreciation for your contributions as the gardening department head. Planting around 10 sample plants over the past six months reflects commendable effort and commitment.

I would also like to seek clarification regarding your sabbatical status. Could you please confirm whether you are currently on sabbatical, and if not, provide an update on who among the team is on sabbatical ?

Also, it would be helpful if you could clarify certain financial details. Specifically, we would like to understand where the ₹9 lakhs collected from residents in October as advance tax is reflected in the MIS. 

Regards,

PRAVEEN T

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SDA Wing 53 Owners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sda-wing-53-own...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-wing-53-owners/CAE_3tgY%3DhaHP4xHSTEFBO9FV96tLGVOxmoAxQ9Dsdp01n11stg%40mail.gmail.com.

Regards,

PRAVEEN T

[Sanjeev]

Praveen,

Since you have shared data to the group, it is only fair we look at the actual responsibility of those costs rather than just the calendar quarters.

1. On Avg Maintenance: If we align the expenses with the tenure in which they were actually initiated and managed (shifting Q3 to the previous association’s bucket where it belongs), the average maintenance charge for your tenure rises significantly, while ours remains stable. I have attached a corrected sheet below for the residents' benefit. It is easy to twist data, but the timing of expenditure doesn’t lie.

2. Personal Queries: Regarding your comments on my sabbatical or the "10 plants" - I am here, the work is being done, and the results will speak for themselves. My personal schedule or the pilot phase of a gardening project are not points of your debate, and I won't be entertaining further distractions on these topics.

Let’s stick to facts that benefit the residents rather than creating a false narrative for the sake of it.

- Sanjeev

[Nandeesh Gunaki]

Hi Association,

Was checking last two MIS. Could you please clarify the following points:

1. Where has the ₹9 lakhs collected from residents been spent?

2. In which section of the MIS can this expense be found?

3. How much amount was paid or transferred  to the Income Tax Department during the period from October to March?

Regards 

Nandeesh Gunaki 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SDA Owner Wing 48" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sda-owner-wing...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-48/CAE_3tgYwtj8LXn0r_GGeFp3m4LMoimX3_CZ%2B-MvWxpH702aDmw%40mail.gmail.com.

[SDA Palm Springs Association]

Hello Nandish and Praveen,

The Association room is wide open and waiting for you gracious presence and any clarification needed can be obtained by yourselves.

Let’s stop misleading residents in any manner. You already tried this when you took over in 2024 and failed miserably and you had your retract your statements.

Also like one of you said accounting is not a joke …. So 

Why don’t you try coming and meeting the association in the upcoming meeting as informed earlier by our Treasurer. We can debate at length as to who did what and when and why.

Lets stop twisting the facts and misleading residents as numbers speak for themselves. Instead of asking where do I find this and that, refer to the documents and come up with questions that makes sense for everyone. So, let’s stop mudslinging on one another as its never ending.

All said and done, we as a team are always open to answer genuine questions not the questions with twisting facts. 

So this will be the last official reply from association on this topic. Rest will be discussed with residents in the upcoming meeting. Kindly take time out and attend the meeting with genuine questions on maintenence and probably few constructive suggestions if you can, which may ultimately benefit society. 

Thanks and Regards,

Krishna S Varadharaj

Joint Secretary

SDAPSAOA

On 25 Mar 2026, at 08:36, Nandeesh Gunaki <gunaki....@gmail.com> wrote:



Hi Association,

Was checking last two MIS. Could you please clarify the following points:

1. Where has the ₹9 lakhs collected from residents been spent?

2. In which section of the MIS can this expense be found?

3. How much amount was paid or transferred  to the Income Tax Department during the period from October to March?

Regards 

Nandeesh Gunaki 

On Tue, 24 Mar, 2026, 10:35 pm Sanjeev, <sunjiv...@gmail.com> wrote:

Praveen,

Since you have shared data to the group, it is only fair we look at the actual responsibility of those costs rather than just the calendar quarters.

1. On Avg Maintenance: If we align the expenses with the tenure in which they were actually initiated and managed (shifting Q3 to the previous association’s bucket where it belongs), the average maintenance charge for your tenure rises significantly, while ours remains stable. I have attached a corrected sheet below for the residents' benefit. It is easy to twist data, but the timing of expenditure doesn’t lie.

[Nitin Sachan]

Dear Nandish and Praveen,

It seems there is still a lot to learn about how mislead/narratives are shaped and presented in our community discussions. Perhaps recent experiences offer useful lessons ,  from entering elections with confidence, withdrawing the name at a convenient stage, and later finding alternative/backdoor  ways to re-enter the Association as an office bearer. With enough patience, one may even position themselves for higher principal roles such as President, Vice President, Treasurer or etc . Clearly, timing and strategy seem to play an important role in such journeys. 

Note: If the intention is genuinely to contribute, the appropriate forum is meeting with the association . Serious concerns deserve serious discussion backed by verified data, not fragmented communication. Let us ensure residents receive clarity, not confusion.

Nitin K. Sachan
8971303123

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SDA Owner Wing 54" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sda-owner-wing...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-54/F8AE99A6-7AF0-4812-B8EA-B7897DAD094B%40gmail.com.

[Anil Ch]

Krishna,

Your response does not address the specific and straightforward questions raised and instead appears to deflect from the core issues.

If “numbers speak for themselves,” there should be no difficulty in providing clear, point-wise answers to the following:

1. Where exactly the ₹9 lakhs collected (₹0.5/sq. ft.) is reflected in the MIS ?
2. The specific expense heads under which this amount has been accounted for ?
3. The exact amount transferred to the Income Tax department during the stated period

These are basic accounting questions, not hypothetical or misleading concerns. They require precise and verifiable answers—not general statements or redirection to meetings.

While meetings can be useful for discussion, they cannot replace transparent, documented financial reporting. Accountability requires that such information be clearly recorded and shared.

As residents, we are well within our rights to question discrepancies and expect clear answers.

We request a direct, factual, and point-wise response to each of the above queries without further deflection.

Regards,

Anil Ch

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SDA Owner Wing 52" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sda-owner-wing...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-52/F8AE99A6-7AF0-4812-B8EA-B7897DAD094B%40gmail.com.

[Chandra, Abhinav B.]

Dear Association,

Every single time we are promised the relief from excess maintenance and every single time we are getting the increase in maintenance. This is seriously not good,  we have one simple question what are the steps that the current association is taking to reduce the maintenance charge??

Thanks & Regards,

Abhinav

---

From: sda-wing-...@googlegroups.com <sda-wing-...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Anil Ch <chinth...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2026 6:13:30 PM
To: SDA Palm Springs Association <sda.palmsprin...@gmail.com>
Cc: Nandeesh Gunaki <gunaki....@gmail.com>; PRAVEEN T <prave...@gmail.com>; Wing Owners DL <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-wing...@googlegroups.com>; Sda Wing48 <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Sda Wing49 <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; 'neha khanna' via SDA Wing Owners <sda-wing-...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [External] Re: Maintenance Charge Clarification

 

WARNING: External email. Be vigilant with links, attachments, and requests.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-wing-53-owners/CAAqkhDr8OpP62_tHSyN-%3D9_SMjD8EohSnonWzToQpU%3DkDXpVhQ%40mail.gmail.com.

---

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security, AI-powered support capabilities, and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. Your privacy is important to us. Accenture uses your personal data only in compliance with data protection laws. For further information on how Accenture processes your personal data, please see our privacy statement at https://www.accenture.com/us-en/privacy-policy.
______________________________________________________________________________________

www.accenture.com

[Chandra, Abhinav B.]

Last year Q3 till Dec was 22,061 @ 21.9 sqft and then Jan-Mar came down to 5.84 per sqft to 17,649 but apart from Q3"25, 2024 completely was always close to 18k so for me apart from Q3 big jump its static to 18k no change, compared to 2023 when it was 11k per quarter. So to sum up from 2023 its always on higher side.

---

From: SDA Palm Springs Association <sda.palmsprin...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2026 7:29:11 PM
To: Chandra, Abhinav B. <abhinav....@accenture.com>
Cc: Anil Ch <chinth...@gmail.com>; Nandeesh Gunaki <gunaki....@gmail.com>; PRAVEEN T <prave...@gmail.com>; Wing Owners DL <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-wing...@googlegroups.com>; Sda Wing48 <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Sda Wing49 <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; 'neha khanna' via SDA Wing Owners <sda-wing-...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: Maintenance Charge Clarification

 

Abhinav, from the time this association has taken over the maintenance is ₹5.8. 

Not sure how come ₹5.8 is higher than ₹7.3 which was the last raised bill by previous association.

Can you confirm from past 2 quarter what does your MyGate invoice reflect maintenance amount as? 

SDAPS AOA

[Chandra, Abhinav B.]

Yes then please  help us.  I do not want to have a conversation comparing Old association, new association. Earlier as well i was paying 18k now as well the same. If you increase to 21k and bring back to 18k that is not making a difference for me.

Can we please have a constructive and meaningful discussion, we are here to help association but also i request you all to help in finding ways to reduce maintenance.

Thank you 

---

From: SDA Palm Springs Association <sda.palmsprin...@gmail.com>

Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2026 8:07:39 PM

To: Chandra, Abhinav B. <abhinav....@accenture.com>
Cc: Anil Ch <chinth...@gmail.com>; Nandeesh Gunaki <gunaki....@gmail.com>; PRAVEEN T <prave...@gmail.com>; Wing Owners DL <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-wing...@googlegroups.com>; Sda Wing48 <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Sda Wing49 <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; 'neha khanna' via SDA Wing Owners <sda-wing-...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: Maintenance Charge Clarification

 

We can take accountability only about our tenure maintenance, which on declining trend. So definitely there has been some action taken which is reflecting.

For the uptick, you missed to ask at right time so now you can address to previous association rather than making a sweeping statement on current association and dismissing their efforts.

SDAPS AOA

[Nandeesh Gunaki]

Dear Nitin, 

Thanks for sharing your perspective. I agree that discussions should be constructive, transparent, and based on verified information.  At the same time, I’d like to highlight that our questions come from a genuine intent, 

1. We had earlier requested details on water hardness, but did not get daily reports

2. Regarding the ₹12 lakh discrepancy raised by the current association, we requested supporting details, access and a discussion with the accountant. These requests were not accommodated, and we were informed that it would be investigated internally. No report. 

3.  4-5 weeks Later, through informal discussions with known colleagues in association, some clarity emerged and the treasurer acknowledged an error. However till now, no updated MoM shared. 

 

Additionally, the current association has collected around ₹7.3 (21k, Oct 1st week)  maintenance by elevating charges (approx. ₹9 lakh (₹0.5) impact).  

We are simply seeking clarity on:

1. How the additional ₹9 lakh has been utilized

2. Why this is not clearly reflected in the MIS

3. The amount paid or transferred towards income tax

These are genuine questions aimed at improving transparency and maintaining proper records, which ultimately benefits the entire community.

For example: Guest house implementation, initially amount was said min 2.5 lakhs(in poll document), when we start questioning,  it became max 2.5 lakhs(while responding to question), finally it guesthouse ready under 1 lakh.  This highlights why scrutiny and questioning is necessary.  

We should encourage asking genuine questions, is my view.

Regards 

Nandeesh Gunaki 

[Nitin Sachan]

Hi Nandish,

Thanks for sharing your points. I can address a few of the queries, and I believe the remaining ones are best clarified by the Association with complete context and records.

Dear Association,
Can we please schedule a meeting this coming weekend to discuss all these queries in detail? It would be more effective to review the data together and close the concerns in a transparent, face-to-face discussion.

This approach will help ensure clarity for everyone and avoid any further confusion.

Regards,
Nitin K. Sachan
8971303123

[SDA Palm Springs Association]

Praveen, in your own words and according to convenience the data shown before election is as below in table (based on your pamphlet only) which is different from what you are quoting now stating as MyGate data. 

Both numbers can't be true, so can you confirm which one is correct data?

Tenure	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4
2023–2024				7
2024–2025	6	8	7	6
2025–2026	6.2	7

Reference is election pamphlet. 

Your current quoted numbers.

Tenure	Q3	Q4	Q1	Q2	Average Maintenance Charge/ tenure
2023–2024	3.8	5.3*	4.5	4.8	4.6
2024–2025	4.9	6.0	5.8	6.2	5.7

2025–2026

7.3*

5.8

–

–

6.6

Thanks,

SDAPSAOA

[Vipinraj KK]

Who is sending all these emails while the association is supposedly on sabbatical? Kindly include your name in the signature so we know who the diligent individual is, even during this “vacation.”  

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SDA Owner Wing 52" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sda-owner-wing...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-52/CANPcH_tbv%2BoSO4fFo90%2B5uZVGFsZOAz_ey9GoqFQi7EUL4jUCQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[Nandeesh Gunaki]

Hi Treasurer,

Thank you for acknowledging the details and confirming the numbers.

This reflects the same expense trend that has been consistently presented over the past 1.5 years through multiple discussions—both online and offline. The data and observations shared earlier remain unchanged, and *we appreciate that there is now alignment on these facts.*

With this clarity, we expect that future communications will remain consistent, fact-based, and validated with the accountant, ensuring transparency and accountability going forward.

Thank you once again for the confirmation. It is truely appreciated.

Regards 

Nandeesh 

[SDA Palm Springs Association]

Nandeesh, we humbly accept your appreciation. Thank you.

@PRAVEEN T the question still remains open, which numbers you stand with (the ones published in pamphlets or the ones you shared over mail)?

@sda ro (Nithin), it is brought to our notice that the Audit report that was tabled in AGM was a signed draft copy. Original unsigned copy is at the association room, there seems to be some hesitation in signing that. Can you ensure that you get the original signed copy submitted to the registrar at earliest as this is a showstopper for us to conduct the current audit. We need to obtain an NOC from the last auditor.

Thanks,

Prasath

[PRAVEEN T]

Prasath,

Please take the example of Q2 2025. The maintenance charge as per the books of accounts works out to more than ₹7/sq. ft., whereas only ₹4.8/sq. ft. was collected as per the MIS during your previous term. This clearly indicates a gap between actuals and what was communicated in MIS.

You may also recall the instance during your tenure when the BESCOM bill was not included in the MIS expense calculation, which resulted in lower maintenance charges being presented at that time.

Given this context, it is difficult to understand why only questions are being raised now without addressing the following:

• How has the ₹9 lakh collected in Q3 2025–26 been utilized?
• Why is this amount not reflected in the MIS expense statement?
• Why are we unable to sustain operations at an average of ₹4.6/sq. ft., as indicated during your previous term?
• Was the capital/corpus fund utilized to maintain lower average maintenance charges?

Request you to provide clear, specific, and point-wise responses to each of the above queries.

---

From: SDA Palm Springs Association <sda.palmsprin...@gmail.com>
Sent: 09 April 2026 14:18
To: Nandeesh Gunaki <gunaki....@gmail.com>; sda ro <sda.ph...@gmail.com>
Cc: PRAVEEN T <prave...@gmail.com>; Anil Ch <chinth...@gmail.com>; Nitin Sachan <nitinsa...@gmail.com>; Sda Wing48 <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Wing 52 Group <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Wing 54 Group <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-wing-...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Group <sda-wing...@googlegroups.com>; Sda Wing49 <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>; Wing Owners DL <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Maintenance Charge Clarification

 

[Prasath K]

If due process was not followed and this is wrong please go ahead and file a compliant. Has anyone stopped you from doing that.

For other stuffs people are running to police station to complain against association and this is a very serious issue and no one is bothered. Strange.

Prasath

On Sat, 11 Apr 2026 at 10:29 AM, ramnath.prasana via Sobha Dream Acres Owners - Wing-50 <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Prasath,

Not trying to support Praveen here.

He atleast contested election and published something.

Whereas you and few past association members avoided contesting election and always get into association via backdoor (without election).

Instead of simply answering with fact and proof you divert attention.

Regards

Ram

On 11 Apr 2026, at 8:38 AM, PRAVEEN T <prave...@gmail.com> wrote:



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SDA Owner Wing 52" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sda-owner-wing...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-52/SE1P216MB194051116ED4B732AF29727EF4262%40SE1P216MB1940.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sobha Dream Acres Owners - Wing-50" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sda-owner-wing...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-50/A2CA6420-76FF-4CB7-A4DC-C7C5C34F4CA5%40icloud.com.

[Partha Pritam Patra]

Ramnath,

You are correct. 

Praveen contested 1st time saying residents 7Lac CCTV bill, reduced maintenance etc...

Even after contested for VP but illegally occupied both Treasurer and VP role.

Atlist current association opening the positions in public forum and asking for nomination. Someone has to join the position. If you're team is hiding and not taking any responsibility.

What can association do?

~~
Thanks & Regards,
Partha Pritam Patra
Cell: +91-8123007772

On Sat, 11 Apr, 2026, 10:29 am ramnath.prasana via Sobha Dream Acres Owners - Wing-50, <sda-owne...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Prasath,

Not trying to support Praveen here.

He atleast contested election and published something.

Whereas you and few past association members avoided contesting election and always get into association via backdoor (without election).

Instead of simply answering with fact and proof you divert attention.

Regards

Ram

On 11 Apr 2026, at 8:38 AM, PRAVEEN T <prave...@gmail.com> wrote:



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SDA Owner Wing 52" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sda-owner-wing...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-52/SE1P216MB194051116ED4B732AF29727EF4262%40SE1P216MB1940.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sobha Dream Acres Owners - Wing-50" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sda-owner-wing...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-50/A2CA6420-76FF-4CB7-A4DC-C7C5C34F4CA5%40icloud.com.

[Partha Pritam Patra]

Ramnath,

You can't say, match is only Valid only when you Own else match is canceled.

I can understand your frustration. You got selected as a treasurer but decided to/forced to resign without any performance. Appreciated your decision. 

Still in India election doesn't happen the way or the logic you are giving. 

1. If any elected member resign for any post.

2. The vacancy notification get published and position opened.

3. Then selection happens based on Nominations.

4. The logic you are giving is only happens if there is any malicious intent.

Facts remains the same. 

1. Praveen lost the open election badly this time.

2. Still he tried to enter the association when the Treasurer position opened. 

3. Again he lost the Voting for treasurer within MC members. 

4. MC members selected Prasath as treasurer. 

Where is the missing link ? What you think is wrong here ?

Can you please clarify on behalf of Praveen, 

1. what made him so desperate attempt to join the association back as a treasurer?

2. Was there any deal pending?

3. What he has not achieved in the previous association as a unofficial Treasurer and want to achieve this year ?

Whether you Agree or disagree, Facts remains same.

~~
Thanks & Regards,
Partha Pritam Patra
Cell: +91-8123007772

On Sat, 11 Apr, 2026, 1:12 pm , <ramnath...@icloud.com> wrote:

Parth,

Its unfortunate as a resident you are not looking for clarity of missing 9lakh and trying to support few people based on some reason.

However, Below are facts communicated by RO/association 

1) Praveen contested elections in 2025 for post of treasurer 

2) He secured 2 place by winning ~100 votes

3) Newly elected treasurer resigned in few weeks

4) Praveen again nominated for the post (while its only logical to choose person who secured 2nd most votes)??

5) However current association chose Prasath as new treasurer (Reasons known only to Subbu and team)

If you have any proof to show otherwise, im happy to stand corrected.

Regards

Ram

On 11 Apr 2026, at 10:37 AM, Partha Pritam Patra <parthapri...@gmail.com> wrote:



To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-52/CA%2BHD-gDd_avTZSov0C7ZAqHn9vDnr6r1LBYr_nfN7mLycyCG%3DA%40mail.gmail.com.

[SDA Palm Springs Association]

@sda ro (Nithin), since you were RO and you had a clear idea about the process. Can you please explain to a larger audience here if there was any process deviation post treasurer resigned. 

Does DoD or any rule states that if an elected member resigns then the next highest voter is to be elected by default?

@ramnath...@icloud.com , when you resigned Sundar was the second highest voter. We all know who was the acting treasurer till the end. 😀

Thanks,

Prasath

On Sat, Apr 11, 2026 at 1:12 PM <ramnath...@icloud.com> wrote:

Parth,

Its unfortunate as a resident you are not looking for clarity of missing 9lakh and trying to support few people based on some reason.

However, Below are facts communicated by RO/association 

1) Praveen contested elections in 2025 for post of treasurer 

2) He secured 2 place by winning ~100 votes

3) Newly elected treasurer resigned in few weeks

4) Praveen again nominated for the post (while its only logical to choose person who secured 2nd most votes)??

5) However current association chose Prasath as new treasurer (Reasons known only to Subbu and team)

If you have any proof to show otherwise, im happy to stand corrected.

Regards

Ram

On 11 Apr 2026, at 10:37 AM, Partha Pritam Patra <parthapri...@gmail.com> wrote:



To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-52/CA%2BHD-gDd_avTZSov0C7ZAqHn9vDnr6r1LBYr_nfN7mLycyCG%3DA%40mail.gmail.com.

[Prasath K]

You concern for money was missing when you depleted corpus without informing residents and resigned. But it’s top priority now 😳.

On Sun, 12 Apr 2026 at 1:38 PM, <ramnath...@icloud.com> wrote:

Prasath,

Ofcourse you are privileged person!!

Thanks for clarifying some and making few statements ", but few remain unanswered.

Like you mentioned below if an individual abuses power, association has nothing to do with it. 

Then why does ASSOCIATION need a lawyer @2.5lakhs? 

Im repeatedly raising it because my money is also used and 2.5lakhs is not small amount to ignore.

Association email says police had "summoned association", but personal mail says police "chased away". So im sure someone is taking note of all these 🙂

Every email is like a gold now, so pls keep it coming!!🙏

Regards

Ram

On 11 Apr 2026, at 2:58 PM, Prasath K <prasath...@gmail.com> wrote:



Ramnath, the reason I switched to personal mail id is because this is my personal opinion. Else I had the privilege to respond using the Treasurer's mail id.

To your point, I responded since you dragged me in repeatedly. 

1) If association abuse(monkey, donkey etc), threaten residents and that too through official emails

Does resident have right to file a case?

Response: If any individual has sent mail from personal id then its a personal act, not an association act. Can you show evidence of association mail being used here.

If a metaphor can hurt so much then, look at attached image what the individual had said during the election campaign. ( others are a bunch of Garbage, look at the obscene pic, left open for interpretation). No one complained, as it was election time and campaign will happen. 

When you were treasurer, there was a blatant lie stating we misappropriated 74Lac, this had hit our credibility, we took it in a healthy way and discussed it with you guys, we didn't took it outside society by choice.

2) If there was no proof or evidence, did police show partiality towards you?

Response: Came to know police have chased away the complainant, they called association to inform and requested us to handle the matter within society. No action was initiated as there was no valid reason.

3) How much is paid/to be paid to lawyer and if this money is not paid from your personal money.

If its not ur personal money, Can all residents also utilise lawyer services??

Response: Agreement is in Mygate and notification was sent, have a look. If a resident or any of our staff gets into trouble assisting or working for society the lawyer is bound to help, not for personal use or grudge. 

Prasath

On Sat, Apr 11, 2026 at 12:20 PM <ramnath...@icloud.com> wrote:

Prasath as Treasurer,

Since you are determined to discuss only personal issues and not finance below are open questions pending 

1) If association abuse(monkey, donkey etc), threaten residents and that too through official emails

Does resident have right to file a case?

Please clarify if above incident happened or not?

2) If there was no proof or evidence, did police show partiality towards you?

3) How much is paid/to be paid to lawyer and if this money is not paid from your personal money.

If its not ur personal money, Can all residents also utilise lawyer services??

Looking forward to your swift response.

Regards

Ram

On 11 Apr 2026, at 10:37 AM, Prasath K <prasath...@gmail.com> wrote:



If due process was not followed and this is wrong please go ahead and file a compliant. Has anyone stopped you from doing that.

For other stuffs people are running to police station to complain against association and this is a very serious issue and no one is bothered. Strange.

Prasath

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sda-owner-wing-52/CAArdvEXCeJTjgO225m_RKNs8kA8Bumm966ESy3wyErtoQ%2B5ZTA%40mail.gmail.com.

<IMG_3794.PNG>

<IMG_3791.PNG>

[ramnath.prasana@icloud.com]

Prasath as Treasurer,

As a treasurer you have access to all documents.

Kindly share proof of "you depleted corpus fund", with all residents in this email.

This is defamation and i request your response within 48 hours!!!

Regards,

Ramanathan 

52016

On 12 Apr 2026, at 2:06 PM, Prasath K <prasath...@gmail.com> wrote:



[Prasath K]

As a resident itself I have access to MyGate documents. Below snap is from the audit report submitted which shows the difference clearly. 

Also, it was discussed multiple times in AGM without any response provided. 

Similar way can you prove the below at least now.

Prasath