Performance : how does ScyllaDB compare with HBase ?

[josh.fa@laposte.net]

Just to know if you have some benchmarks about ScyllaDB vs HBase on the read/write performance side ?

If you have no benchmarks, do you think conceptually that ScyllaDB will outperforms HBase on most workloads ?

Advantages I see about ScyllaDB :

- no JVM / no JVM garbadge collector

- written in C++, and low level highly optimized

- self-configuration for performance

- not depending on HDFS that add latencies

Thanks

[Avi Kivity]

Here's a benchmark by IBM running Janus Graph:

https://www.scylladb.com/tech-talk/performance-evaluation-scylla-database-backend-janusgraph-scylla-summit-2017/

The points below are correct, especially not relying on HDFS which is not designed for database workloads.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ScyllaDB users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scylladb-user...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to scyllad...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/scylladb-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scylladb-users/236e8b25-cad7-471d-a456-eb5b9a0ca58d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[josh.fa@laposte.net]

Thank you for this very exciting independant benchmark.