Economic Sub committee-
The meeting today will be difficult for
me to make due to other commitments . However I have read the document
and have a few comments. First I am forwarding some documents that I
sent previously on
May 13 regarding accounting for sustainability. Since there is no model
per se for "sustainability accounting" I think we need to start by
looking at what other sectors are doing - which is primarily in the
area of reporting potential risks, understanding and reporting key
impacts and being able to evaluate decisions with an appropriate time
frame and life cycle approach. Sustainability accounting happens first
by opening up a more expansive definition of progress and success, and
by requiring the operator to understand their impacts in the broader
context of sustainability. I would like to see our definitions address
these ideas. Specifically by adding some of these ideas to Risk
Management and changing Input/Outputs to Life Cycle Accounting, and
incorporating some of these broader concepts including "Connected
Reporting."
This is
very
conceptual but if we want to require ACTUAL
accounting entries by the operator then I refer you to the "Kooistra
method" (named for the VP of Finance at Frontier Natural Products Co-op)
which is an idea that the operator would actually make a
non-cash entry into the P&L (similar to entries for depreciation)
which builds up a
reserve account on the balance sheet to pay for future potential
liabilities due to externalities. You could reduce the entry required if
certain practices
were followed. However, this is kind of complicated and you would have
to use
a gross measure of externalities based on something like the article by
Tegtmeier and Duffy forwarded by Eric.
The more reasonable alternative
may be to
develop an expanded reporting system in which the operator needs to
explain their impacts, and put in context the risks and benefits created
for the larger system by their practices. Quantifying where possible. I
think this expanded use of reporting and accounting is what part of
what we are
trying to get at with "economic sustainability" and would be a good
step.
You can see from the attached that Forum for the Future is
working on financial guidance and Accounting for Sustainability is too.
Here are some excerpts from Accounting for Sustainability about
Connected Performance Reports:
What
is connected reporting?Connected reporting aims to
provide a new approach to corporate reporting and to address the growing
dissatisfaction, amongst both preparers and users, with the
incompleteness, length and complexity of many organizations’ Annual
Report and Accounts.
A connected report should be focused on the
needs of long-term investors and executive management. Reported
information should identify and explain the connection between the
organization’s strategic objectives, the industry, market and social
context within which the business operates, the associated risks and
opportunities it faces, the key resources and relationships on which it
depends, and the governance, reward and remuneration structures in
place. Further, it should explain the connection between delivery of the
business’s strategy and its financial and non-financial performance.
The result is a more concise, rounded and balanced picture of an
organization’s overall performance, which reflects the organization’s
strategy and the way it is managed.
Three Key Steps1. Connecting business strategy and
sustainability The identification of material sustainability issues and
description of how each of these impact on the organization’s strategic
objectives.
2. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and actions
taken The evaluation of action taken to address each material
sustainability issue and the identification of KPIs to measure
performance.
3. The Connected Performance Report A balanced
assessment of progress against agreed targets and towards intended
outcomes.
Furthermore there is a lot of good guidance on the
Canadian web-site linked to by the Michigan state link sent by Taylor:
Agriculture in harmony with nature: Strategy for
Environmentally
Sustainable Agriculture and Agri-food Development. We might not
be able to develop a complete system to calculate tradeoffs between
profitability and sustainability impact but we can lay the ground work
for becoming knowledgeable, transparent reporting, and continuous improvement.
Also
please note the following six principles from Canadian web-site
including the principle of Intergenerational Equity and the goal of
clarifying the links between a market agricultural system and excellent
environmental standards:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada's
Environmental Commitment
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada works with the agriculture and
agri-food industries and other Canadians to conserve the resource base
on which food production depends and to protect the environmental
integrity of the agricultural landscape for present and future
generations while maintaining the highest environmental standards in the
operation of our own department.
The following six principles guided the design of Strategy
for Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture and Agri-food Development in
Canada.
Partnerships:
We will actively cooperate with our sectoral, government, and
other partners in our work to promote sustainable agriculture and
agri-food production.
Integration:
We will encourage building environmental thinking into the way
decisions are made and business is conducted in Canada - on the farm, in
the food processing plant or food distribution center, and in the
government office.
Ecosystem approach:
We will promote an ecosystem approach to better place
agriculture
and agri-food activities in the context of the broader environment.
Environmental and resource stewardship:
We will promote anticipate-and prevent
rather than react-and-cure
approaches to the stewardship and protection of the resource base and
the environment.
Intergenerational equity:
We will strive for a fair distribution of the costs and
benefits
between generations and encourage environmentally responsible practices
today to minimize the environmental liabilities our children might some
day have to assume.
Competitiveness:
We will build on and support a market system that promotes the
best environmental practices, clarifying the linkages between
environmental sustain-ability and economic productivity and
competitiveness.
I hope to get on the call - if not I
hope this gives you an idea of my feedback.
Jesse
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "jesse singerman" <
jesse.s...@mchsi.com>
To: "economic subcommittee" <
scs001econo...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 5:57:00 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Intergenerational equity
Hi all - Attached are some uses of the idea of inter-generational equity as used in:
Report by the Commission on the Measurement
of Economic Performance and Social Progress. 2008. ed. Professor Joseph E.
Stiglitz, Chair, Columbia University, Professor
Amartya Sen, Chair Adviser, Harvard University, Professor Jean-Paul Fitoussi, Coordinator of
the Commission, IEP
URL in the document. I'll send it to Amanda for the library.
I've also attached a guide to Connected Reporting from The Prince's Accounting for Sustainability Project, and a document from Forum for Future about how sustainability creates business value. I'm not suggesting these are directly applicable to us, only that they represent a way of thinking and an approach we could adapt to our work.
Hope you find this useful.
Jesse